World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander A. Morley

Alexander A. Morley

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
12334
World Ranking
14937
National Ranking
410

Alexander A. Morley publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander A. Morley sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 183 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Alexander A. Morley D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander A. Morley sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander A. Morley is a researcher affiliated with Flinders University in Australia, with a primary focus on medicine and molecular biology. Their work spans several interconnected disciplines, including biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, pathology, forensic medicine, cancer research, and public health.

Their research addresses key topics such as molecular biology techniques and applications, lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, cancer genomics and diagnostics, acute lymphoblastic leukemia research, CRISPR and genetic engineering, bacteriophages and microbial interactions, and SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing.

Alexander A. Morley has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
  • PLoS ONE
  • Blood
  • Leukemia
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Their recent scientific papers include:

  • Quantifying measurable residual disease correctly, 2023, Leukemia
  • Inhibition of the PCR by genomic DNA, 2023, PLoS ONE
  • Sensitive Measurement of Minimal Residual Disease in Blood by HAT-PCR, 2022, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
  • Patient-Specific Minimal Residual Disease Primers Amplify with Uniformly High Efficiency, 2021, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
  • Patient-Specific MRD Primers Amplify with Uniformly High Efficiency, 2020, Blood

Alexander A. Morley frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Sue Latham, Elizabeth Hughes, Bradley Budgen, Susan Latham, and Paul B. Bartley. These partnerships often result in shared publications, reflecting a collaborative approach to advancing knowledge in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

    Michael Fenech;Alexander A. Morley

  • Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution.

    P J Sykes;S H Neoh;M J Brisco;E Hughes

  • Cytokinesis-block micronucleus method in human lymphocytes: effect of in vivo ageing and low dose X-irradiation.

    Michael Fenech;Alexander A. Morley

  • Outcome prediction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by molecular quantification of residual disease at the end of induction

    M.J. Brisco;J. Condon;E. Hughes;S-H. Neoh

  • Monoclonality in B-Lymphoproliferative Disorders Detected at the DNA Level

    Kevin J. Trainor;Michael J. Brisco;Colin J. Story;Alexander A. Morley

  • Measurement of in vivo mutations in human lymphocytes.

    Alexander A. Morley;Kevin J. Trainor;Ram Seshadri;Richard G. Ryall

  • Solutions to the kinetic problem in the micronucleus assay.

    M Fenech;A Morley

  • The effect of donor age on spontaneous and induced micronuclei.

    Michael Fenech;Alexander A. Morley

  • Mutation frequency in human lymphocytes increases with age

    Kevin J. Trainor;Dianne J. Wigmore;Anna Chrysostomou;John L. Dempsey

  • Digital PCR: A brief history

    Alexander A. Morley

  • In vivo somatic mutations in human lymphocytes frequently result from major gene alterations.

    D. R. Turner;A. A. Morley;Marina Haliandros;R. Kutlaca

  • Exposure of human lymphocytes to ionizing radiation reduces mutagenesis by subsequent ionizing radiation

    B.J.S. Sanderson;A.A. Morley

  • The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation.

    Antony M. Hooker;Madhava Bhat;Tanya K. Day;Joanne M. Lane

  • Relationship Between Minimal Residual Disease and Outcome in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    J Brisco;E Hughes;SH Neoh;PJ Sykes

  • Mutation rate of normal and malignant human lymphocytes.

    Ram Seshadri;Robert J. Kutlaca;Kevin Trainor;Chris Matthews

  • Detection of the molecular abnormality in chronic myeloid leukemia by use of the polymerase chain reaction.

    Alexander Dobrovic;Kevin J. Trainor;Alexander A. Morley

  • Effect of dietary restriction on in vivo somatic mutation in mice.

    J.L. Dempsey;M. Pfeiffer;A.A. Morley

  • Increased mutation frequency following treatment with cancer chemotherapy.

    John L. Dempsey;John L. Dempsey;Ram S. Seshadri;Alexander A. Morley

  • Rapid method for detecting monoclonality in B cell lymphoma in lymph node aspirates using the polymerase chain reaction

    J H Wan;P J Sykes;S R Orell;A A Morley

  • Detection and quantitation of neoplastic cells in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, by use of the polymerase chain reaction

    M. J. Brisco;J. Condon;P. J. Sykes;S. H. Neoh

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech University of South Australia
Timothy P. Hughes
Timothy P. Hughes South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
Wayne D. Tilley
Wayne D. Tilley University of Adelaide
Heddy Zola
Heddy Zola Flinders Medical Centre
Manuel Sobrinho-Simões
Manuel Sobrinho-Simões University of Porto
Kenneth F. Bradstock
Kenneth F. Bradstock Westmead Hospital
Elizabeth Baker
Elizabeth Baker Pathwest Laboratory Medicine
David F. Callen
David F. Callen University of Adelaide
Grant R. Sutherland
Grant R. Sutherland University of Adelaide
Terence P. Speed
Terence P. Speed Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Biology and Biochemistry opens diverse pathways in healthcare and life sciences. Programs now offer flexible and accelerated options, allowing students to quickly enter high-demand fields. For instance, students interested in mental health roles can pursue psych nurse practitioner programs to train for clinical practice and patient support.

Dietetics and nutrition is another rapidly growing area. If you’re interested in preventative health, a 2 year nutrition degree online lets you get started with a short and affordable program tailored to emerging careers in food science and community health.

For those looking to advance into management, an MBA focused on healthcare can fast-track your career. Consider the healthcare mba cost and affordability when comparing online options.

Finally, coding and compliance roles remain critical in healthcare administration. The differences between ccs vs cpc certification can impact your earning potential and job opportunities, making it important to research which certification aligns best with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander A. Morley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles