World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4373 4187 331 322 136 17887

James A. Screen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James A. Screen between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James A. Screen published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2023. 22 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2023. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James A. Screen: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 4
2011 3
2012 5
2013 4
2014 5
2015 8
2016 7
2017 10
2018 11
2019 14
2020 13
2021 10
2022 16
2023 30
2024 24
2025 21
2026 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

James A. Screen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Screen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 136
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

James A. Screen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Screen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

James A. Screen is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research focuses extensively on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional work in Oceanography, Environmental Chemistry, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior, and Systematics.

The scientist's main topics of investigation cover Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, climate variability and models, climate change and permafrost, meteorological phenomena and simulations, cryospheric studies and observations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and oceanographic and atmospheric processes.

Recent publications by James A. Screen include:

  • Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • New climate models reveal faster and larger increases in Arctic precipitation than previously projected, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Insignificant effect of Arctic amplification on the amplitude of midlatitude atmospheric waves, 2020, Science Advances
  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Weakened evidence for mid-latitude impacts of Arctic warming, 2020, Nature Climate Change

The scientist regularly publishes in venues such as Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Climate, Science Advances, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, and Nature Climate Change.

James A. Screen has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Jennifer L. Catto, Russell Blackport, Hao Yu, Stephanie Hay, and Adam A. Scaife. These collaborations reflect a consistent engagement with research partners on related climate and atmospheric science topics.

Best Publications

  • The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification.

    James A. Screen;Ian Simmonds

  • Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather

    Judah Cohen;James A. Screen;Jason C. Furtado;Mathew Barlow

  • Insights from Earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects

    Clara Deser;Flavio Lehner;Keith B. Rodgers;Toby R. Ault

  • The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet‐stream: Can it? Has it? Will it?

    Elizabeth A Barnes;James A Screen

  • Exploring links between Arctic amplification and mid‐latitude weather

    James A. Screen;James A. Screen;Ian Simmonds

  • Arctic amplification decreases temperature variance in northern mid- to high-latitudes

    James A. Screen

  • The Atmospheric Response to Three Decades of Observed Arctic Sea Ice Loss

    James A. Screen;Ian Simmonds;Clara Deser;Robert Tomas

  • Amplified mid-latitude planetary waves favour particular regional weather extremes

    James A. Screen;Ian Simmonds

  • Increasing fall-winter energy loss from the Arctic Ocean and its role in Arctic temperature amplification

    James A. Screen;Ian Simmonds

  • Nonlinear response of mid-latitude weather to the changing Arctic

    James E. Overland;Klaus Dethloff;Jennifer A. Francis;Richard J. Hall

  • Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models

    James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Doug M. Smith;Xiangdong Zhang

  • Local and remote controls on observed Arctic warming

    James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Ian Simmonds

  • Changes in impacts of climate extremes: Human systems and ecosystems

    John Handmer;Yasushi Honda;Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz;Nigel Arnell

  • Minimal influence of reduced Arctic sea ice on coincident cold winters in mid-latitudes

    Russell Blackport;James A. Screen;Karin van der Wiel;Richard Bintanja

  • The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification

    Doug M. Smith;James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Judah Cohen

  • Atmospheric impacts of Arctic sea-ice loss, 1979–2009: separating forced change from atmospheric internal variability

    James A. Screen;James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Ian Simmonds;Robert Tomas

  • New climate models reveal faster and larger increases in Arctic precipitation than previously projected.

    Michelle R. McCrystall;Julienne Stroeve;Mark Serreze;Bruce C. Forbes

  • The atmospheric role in the Arctic water cycle: A review on processes, past and future changes, and their impacts

    Timo Vihma;James Screen;Michael Tjernström;Brandi Newton

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

    Unknown

  • Insignificant effect of Arctic amplification on the amplitude of midlatitude atmospheric waves.

    Russell Blackport;James A. Screen

  • Contribution of sea-ice loss to Arctic amplification is regulated by Pacific Ocean decadal variability

    James A. Screen;Jennifer A. Francis

  • Potential influences on the United Kingdom's floods of winter 2013/14

    Chris Huntingford;Terry Marsh;Adam A. Scaife;Elizabeth J. Kendon

Frequent Co-Authors

Clara Deser
Clara Deser National Center for Atmospheric Research
Ian Simmonds
Ian Simmonds University of Melbourne
Adam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife Met Office
Thomas Jung
Thomas Jung Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Jennifer E. Kay
Jennifer E. Kay University of Colorado Boulder
Richard Bintanja
Richard Bintanja University of Groningen
Doug Smith
Doug Smith Met Office
James E. Overland
James E. Overland Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Jennifer A. Francis
Jennifer A. Francis Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that benefit from complementary skills and knowledge. For instance, a strong understanding of spatial data is crucial in this field, making a gis degree an excellent choice for students interested in mapping and analyzing environmental data.

Environmental professionals often engage with policy development and public administration to drive sustainable change. Those looking to enhance their leadership skills may consider a mpa one year program, which provides practical knowledge in governance and administration within a condensed timeframe.

Social factors play a significant role in environmental issues, making a background in sociology highly relevant. Pursuing a sociology bachelor degree online can equip students with insights into human behavior and community dynamics that affect environmental policies and initiatives.

For those aiming to contribute through education and policy research without the lengthy commitment of a traditional dissertation, several online edd programs no dissertation provide flexible options to advance their academic credentials while focusing on impactful research projects.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Screen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles