World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julienne Stroeve

Julienne Stroeve

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
82
Citations
34267
World Ranking
864
National Ranking
34

Julienne Stroeve publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julienne Stroeve sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 297 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Julienne Stroeve D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julienne Stroeve sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Julienne Stroeve is affiliated with the University of Manitoba in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Atmospheric Science.

Their research encompasses several main topics including:

  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate variability and models
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Arctic and Russian Policy Studies

Frequent collaborators in their work include Michel Tsamados, Robbie Mallett, Jack Landy, Rasmus Tonboe, and Rosemary Willatt.

Key recent papers authored by others in the related field that align with themes in Stroeve's domain include:

  • Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6 (2020), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Snow and sea ice (2022), published in Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • New climate models reveal faster and larger increases in Arctic precipitation than previously projected (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • A Lagrangian Snow-Evolution System for Sea-Ice Applications (SnowModel-LG): Part I-Model Description (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Sea Ice Roughness Overlooked as a Key Source of Uncertainty in CryoSat-2 Ice Freeboard Retrievals (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans

Publication venues that frequently feature research connected to Stroeve's work include:

  • The Cryosphere
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Annals of Glaciology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans

The majority of Stroeve's publications lie within Atmospheric Science, with significant contributions also made in Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, and Sociology and Political Science.

Best Publications

  • Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast

    Julienne Stroeve;Marika M. Holland;Walt Meier;Ted Scambos

  • The Arctic’s rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis

    Julienne C. Stroeve;Mark C. Serreze;Marika M. Holland;Jennifer E. Kay;Jennifer E. Kay

  • Perspectives on the Arctic's Shrinking Sea-Ice Cover

    Mark C. Serreze;Marika M. Holland;Julienne Stroeve

  • The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification

    M. C. Serreze;A. P. Barrett;J. C. Stroeve;D. N. Kindig

  • Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations

    Julienne C. Stroeve;Vladimir Kattsov;Andrew Barrett;Mark Serreze

  • Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons

    Julienne Stroeve;Julienne Stroeve;Dirk Notz

  • A younger, thinner Arctic ice cover: Increased potential for rapid, extensive sea-ice loss

    J. A. Maslanik;C. Fowler;J. Stroeve;S. Drobot

  • Changes in Arctic Melt Season and Implications for Sea Ice Loss

    J. C. Stroeve;J. C. Stroeve;T. Markus;L. Boisvert;J. Miller

  • Distribution and trends in Arctic sea ice age through spring 2011

    James Maslanik;Julienne Stroeve;Charles Fowler;William Emery

  • Recent changes in Arctic sea ice melt onset, freezeup, and melt season length

    Thorsten Markus;Julienne C. Stroeve;Jeffrey Miller

  • Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather

    J. Cohen;X. Zhang;J. Francis;T. Jung;T. Jung

  • Arctic Sea Ice Extent Plummets in 2007

    Julienne Stroeve;Mark Serreze;Sheldon Drobot;Shari Gearheard

  • Temperature and vegetation seasonality diminishment over northern lands

    L. Xu;R.B. Myneni;F.S. Chapin Iii;T.V. Callaghan

  • Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly follows anthropogenic CO2 emission

    Dirk Notz;Julienne Stroeve

  • Seasonal and Regional Manifestation of Arctic Sea Ice Loss

    Ingrid H. Onarheim;Tor Eldevik;Lars H. Smedsrud;Julienne C. Stroeve

  • Tracking the Arctic's shrinking ice cover: Another extreme September minimum in 2004

    J. C. Stroeve;M. C. Serreze;F. Fetterer;T. Arbetter

  • Greenland ice sheet albedo feedback: thermodynamics and atmospheric drivers

    J. E. Box;X. Fettweis;J. C. Stroeve;Marco Tedesco

  • The polar regions in a 2°C warmer world

    Eric Post;Richard B. Alley;Torben R. Christensen;Marc Macias-Fauria

  • Arctic sea ice trends, variability and implications for seasonal ice forecasting.

    Mark C. Serreze;Julienne Stroeve

  • A record minimum arctic sea ice extent and area in 2002

    M. C. Serreze;J. A. Maslanik;T. A. Scambos;F. Fetterer

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark C. Serreze
Mark C. Serreze University of Colorado Boulder
Michel Tsamados
Michel Tsamados University College London
James A. Maslanik
James A. Maslanik University of Colorado Boulder
Walter N. Meier
Walter N. Meier University of Colorado Boulder
Marika M. Holland
Marika M. Holland National Center for Atmospheric Research
Marco Tedesco
Marco Tedesco Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Thorsten Markus
Thorsten Markus Goddard Space Flight Center
Stéphanie Jenouvrier
Stéphanie Jenouvrier Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Jason E. Box
Jason E. Box Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Konrad Steffen
Konrad Steffen Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career paths, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For professionals interested in public administration roles related to environmental policy, exploring a 1 year mpa online can provide valuable leadership skills and a quick route to advancing your career.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial in environmental work, making an online bachelors in sociology a worthy consideration. This degree enhances your ability to assess human impact on ecosystems and design effective community-based solutions.

For those targeting academic or high-level policy positions, advanced degrees are essential. Numerous doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible options to earn credentials without the traditional dissertation hurdle, making professional growth more accessible.

Moreover, the best best eds to edd programs provide seamless pathways for educators and researchers seeking to deepen their expertise in environmental education and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Julienne Stroeve

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles