World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
12294
World Ranking
3821
National Ranking
1457

Thorsten Markus publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thorsten Markus sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Thorsten Markus D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thorsten Markus sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thorsten Markus is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research is primarily focused on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong emphasis on Atmospheric Science. The scope of their work also covers subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist has contributed to several main research topics including:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Climate variability and models

Their recent papers span key areas related to ice dynamics and climate processes. Notable publications include:

  • "Pervasive ice sheet mass loss reflects competing ocean and atmosphere processes," 2020, published in Science
  • "Winter Arctic Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat-2 Freeboards," 2020, published in Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • "Intercomparison of Precipitation Estimates over the Southern Ocean from Atmospheric Reanalyses," 2020, published in Journal of Climate
  • "2020 ICESat-2 Hackweek Tutorials," 2020, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Among frequent co-authors collaborating with Thorsten Markus are T. Neumann, Alek Petty, Johan Nilsson, Fernando Paolo, and Ben Smith.

Their work has appeared in several respected publication venues, including:

  • Science
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Journal of Climate
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation

    Thorsten Markus;Tom Neumann;Anthony Martino;Waleed Abdalati

  • Changes in Arctic Melt Season and Implications for Sea Ice Loss

    J. C. Stroeve;J. C. Stroeve;T. Markus;L. Boisvert;J. Miller

  • Recent changes in Arctic sea ice melt onset, freezeup, and melt season length

    Thorsten Markus;Julienne C. Stroeve;Jeffrey Miller

  • Pervasive ice sheet mass loss reflects competing ocean and atmosphere processes.

    Ben Smith;Helen A. Fricker;Alex S. Gardner;Brooke Medley

  • The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite – 2 mission: A global geolocated photon product derived from the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System

    Thomas A Neumann;Anthony J Martino;Thorsten Markus;Sungkoo Bae

  • The ICESat-2 Laser Altimetry Mission

    Waleed Abdalati;H Jay Zwally;Robert Bindschadler;Bea Csatho

  • An enhancement of the NASA Team sea ice algorithm

    T. Markus;D.J. Cavalieri

  • Sea ice concentration, ice temperature, and snow depth using AMSR-E data

    J.C. Comiso;D.J. Cavalieri;T. Markus

  • Satellite Observations of Antarctic Sea Ice Thickness and Volume

    Nathan Kurtz;Nathan Kurtz;Thorsten Markus

  • Snow Depth Distribution Over Sea Ice in the Southern Ocean from Satellite Passive Microwave Data

    Thorsten Markus;Donald J. Cavalieri

  • Ecological impact of a large Antarctic iceberg

    Kevin R. Arrigo;Gert L. van Dijken;David G. Ainley;Mark A. Fahnestock

  • Seasonal evolution and interannual variability of the local solar energy absorbed by the Arctic sea ice–ocean system

    Donald K. Perovich;Son V. Nghiem;Thorsten Markus;Axel Schweiger

  • A method to estimate subpixel-scale coastal polynyas with satellite passive microwave data

    Thorsten Markus;Barbara A. Burns

  • Sea ice conditions and melt season duration variability within the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: 1979–2008

    Stephen E. L. Howell;Claude R. Duguay;Thorsten Markus

  • Solar partitioning in a changing Arctic sea-ice cover

    D. K. Perovich;K. F. Jones;B. Light;H. Eicken

  • Algorithm for Detection of Ground and Canopy Cover in Micropulse Photon-Counting Lidar Altimeter Data in Preparation for the ICESat-2 Mission

    Ute Christina Herzfeld;Brian W. McDonald;Bruce F. Wallin;Thomas A. Neumann

  • Influence of Arctic sea ice extent on polar cloud fraction and vertical structure and implications for regional climate

    Stephen P. Palm;Sara T. Strey;James Spinhirne;Thorsten Markus

  • Antarctic Sea Ice Thickness and Snow-to-Ice Conversion from Atmospheric Reanalysis and Passive Microwave Snow Depth

    Ted Maksym;Thorsten Markus

  • Estimation of Thin Ice Thickness and Detection of Fast Ice from SSM/I Data in the Antarctic Ocean

    Takeshi Tamura;Kay I. Ohshima;Thorsten Markus;Donald J. Cavalieri

  • Winter Arctic Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat‐2 Freeboards

    Alek A. Petty;Alek A. Petty;Nathan T. Kurtz;Ron Kwok;Thorsten Markus

  • Coastal polynyas in the southern Weddell Sea: Variability of the surface energy budget

    Ian A. Renfrew;John C. King;Thorsten Markus

  • Intercomparison of Precipitation Estimates over the Arctic Ocean and Its Peripheral Seas from Reanalyses

    Linette N. Boisvert;Melinda A. Webster;Alek A. Petty;Thorsten Markus

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald J. Cavalieri
Donald J. Cavalieri Goddard Space Flight Center
Thomas A. Neumann
Thomas A. Neumann Goddard Space Flight Center
Julienne Stroeve
Julienne Stroeve University of Manitoba
Ron Kwok
Ron Kwok University of Washington
Donald K. Perovich
Donald K. Perovich Dartmouth College
James A. Maslanik
James A. Maslanik University of Colorado Boulder
Matthew Sturm
Matthew Sturm University of Alaska Fairbanks
Robert A. Massom
Robert A. Massom Australian Antarctic Division
William B. Krabill
William B. Krabill Goddard Space Flight Center
Anthony P. Worby
Anthony P. Worby Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable career flexibility. Many students begin with an accredited affordable online general studies degree, which offers a broad educational foundation before specializing.

Students looking for specialized fields may consider the best online geology degree. This path aligns closely with environmental science careers by focusing on earth sciences and natural resources.

For advanced professional growth, some pursue fully funded doctorate programs like fully funded dsw programs, which, though centered in social work, share interdisciplinary links with environment-related policy and community advocacy.

Additionally, those seeking a more accessible entry point might explore the easiest bachelor degree options, which can help balance career advancement with personal commitments. Each pathway offers varied benefits suited to different learning styles and career goals in the environmental sciences field.

Best Scientists Citing Thorsten Markus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles