World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
77
Citations
19397
World Ranking
1142
National Ranking
496

Matthew D. Shupe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew D. Shupe sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 286 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Matthew D. Shupe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew D. Shupe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew D. Shupe is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions in Environmental Science. Within these fields, their work extensively covers subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, Environmental Engineering, and Oceanography.

The main topics explored in Shupe's research include:

  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Climate variability and models

Shupe has frequently published in several scientific venues, demonstrating a consistent publication record. These venues include:

  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Geophysical Research Letters

The researcher has coauthored many works with frequent collaborators such as Christopher J. Cox, Michael Gallagher, Gijs de Boer, Manfred Wendisch, and Julia Schmale.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Shupe, the following are notable:

  • "Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere", 2022, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Arctic Report Card 2020: The MOSAiC Expedition: A Year Drifting with the Arctic Sea Ice", 2020, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NOAA Central Library

These publications contribute to the understanding of Arctic conditions and atmospheric processes, particularly through involvement in the MOSAiC expedition.

Best Publications

  • Cloud Radiative Forcing of the Arctic Surface: The Influence of Cloud Properties, Surface Albedo, and Solar Zenith Angle

    Matthew D. Shupe;Janet M. Intrieri

  • Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean

    Taneil Uttal;Judith A. Curry;Miles G. McPhee;Donald K. Perovich

  • Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds

    Hugh Morrison;Gijs de Boer;Gijs de Boer;Graham Feingold;Jerry Harrington

  • An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA

    J. M. Intrieri;C. W. Fairall;M. D. Shupe;P. O. G. Persson

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition—Atmosphere

    Unknown

  • Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties Derived from Surface-Based Sensors at SHEBA

    Matthew D. Shupe;Sergey Y. Matrosov;Taneil Uttal

  • An annual cycle of Arctic cloud characteristics observed by radar and lidar at SHEBA

    J. M. Intrieri;M. D. Shupe;T. Uttal;B. J. McCarty

  • The Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment.

    J. Verlinde;J. Y. Harrington;G. M. McFarquhar;V. T. Yannuzzi

  • July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds

    R. Bennartz;M. D. Shupe;D. D. Turner;V. P. Walden

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition

    Unknown

  • Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud

    Stephen A. Klein;Renata B. McCoy;Hugh Morrison;Andrew S. Ackerman

  • The Arctic Cloud Puzzle: Using ACLOUD/PASCAL Multiplatform Observations to Unravel the Role of Clouds and Aerosol Particles in Arctic Amplification

    Manfred Wendisch;Andreas Macke;André Ehrlich;Christof Lüpkes

  • Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part II: Thermodynamic Phase Characteristics

    Matthew D. Shupe

  • Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part I: Occurrence and Macrophysical Properties

    Matthew D. Shupe;Von P. Walden;Edwin Eloranta;Taneil Uttal

  • Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds

    Greg M. McFarquhar;Steven Ghan;Johannes Verlinde;Alexei Korolev

  • Toward understanding of differences in current cloud retrievals of ARM ground-based measurements

    Chuanfeng Zhao;Shaocheng Xie;Stephen A. Klein;Alain Protat

  • An Arctic CCN-limited cloud-aerosol regime

    T. Mauritsen;Joseph Sedlar;Michael Tjernström;Caroline Leck

  • Evidence of liquid dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface remote sensors

    G. de Boer;H. Morrison;M. D. Shupe;R. Hildner

  • A Focus On Mixed-Phase Clouds

    Matthew D. Shupe;John S. Daniel;Gijs de Boer;Edwin W. Eloranta

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition

    Unknown

  • Vertical Motions in Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Clouds

    Matthew D. Shupe;Pavlos Kollias;P. Ola G. Persson;Greg Michael McFarquhar

  • Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties Derived from Surface-Based Sensors

    M. D. Shupe;T. Uttal

  • An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA : The surface heat budget of arctic ocen (SHEBA)

    J. M. Intrieri;C. W. Fairall;M. D. Shupe;P. O. G. Persson

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Tjernström
Michael Tjernström Stockholm University
David D. Turner
David D. Turner National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ian M. Brooks
Ian M. Brooks University of Leeds
Joseph Sedlar
Joseph Sedlar National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Taneil Uttal
Taneil Uttal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Sergey Y. Matrosov
Sergey Y. Matrosov University of Colorado Boulder
P. Ola G. Persson
P. Ola G. Persson University of Colorado Boulder
Hugh Morrison
Hugh Morrison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Thorsten Mauritsen
Thorsten Mauritsen Stockholm University
Ralf Bennartz
Ralf Bennartz Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options and tailor education to specific interests. Many students seek programs that balance quality with affordability, making an affordable online general studies degree an attractive starting point. These programs often provide a flexible foundation while maintaining costs.

If convenience and manageable coursework load are priorities, considering one of the easiest bachelor's degree options can help students progress steadily without compromising academic goals. While Environmental Sciences can be challenging, degrees that integrate related disciplines may offer more accessible pathways.

Specialized fields such as geoscience align closely with environmental studies. Pursuing an online geoscience degree opens doors to careers in earth sciences, resource management, and climate research, combining theory with practical applications.

Another promising area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), essential for environmental data analysis and decision-making. Top-ranked programs available through the best GIS programs in the US provide technical skills highly sought after in environmental consulting, urban planning, and conservation fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew D. Shupe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles