World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
7820
World Ranking
5322
National Ranking
404

Ian M. Brooks publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Brooks sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Ian M. Brooks D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian M. Brooks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian M. Brooks is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans a wide range of topics related to atmospheric and cryospheric sciences, with a particular focus on polar regions.

Their research output includes publications in several notable scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, arXiv (Cornell University), and Elementa Science of the Anthropocene.

Key research topics covered in Brooks' work are:

  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Climate variability and models
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Brooks has authored or coauthored papers on a variety of subjects including the mechanisms behind aerosol production in polar environments and greenhouse gas fluxes. Notable recent papers are:

  • "Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere," 2022, published in Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Frequent new particle formation over the high Arctic pack ice by enhanced iodine emissions," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice," 2020, published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Shipborne eddy covariance observations of methane fluxes constrain Arctic sea emissions," 2020, published in Science Advances
  • "Highly Active Ice-Nucleating Particles at the Summer North Pole," 2022, published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Their research often involves collaboration, with frequent coauthors including John Prytherch, Michael Tjernström, Ian A. Renfrew, Paul Zieger, and Ryan R. Neely.

Best Publications

  • A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles

    Theodore W. Wilson;Luis A. Ladino;Peter A. Alpert;Mark N. Breckels

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition—Atmosphere

    Unknown

  • Finding Boundary Layer Top: Application of a Wavelet Covariance Transform to Lidar Backscatter Profiles

    Ian M. Brooks

  • An Arctic CCN-limited cloud-aerosol regime

    T. Mauritsen;Joseph Sedlar;Michael Tjernström;Caroline Leck

  • A Method for Estimating the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from a Vertically Pointing Doppler Lidar, and Independent Evaluation from Balloon-Borne In Situ Measurements

    Ewan J. O'Connor;Ewan J. O'Connor;Anthony J. Illingworth;Ian M. Brooks;Christopher D. Westbrook

  • Frequent new particle formation over the high Arctic pack ice by enhanced iodine emissions.

    Andrea Baccarini;Linn Karlsson;Josef Dommen;Patrick Duplessis

  • A transitioning Arctic surface energy budget: the impacts of solar zenith angle, surface albedo and cloud radiative forcing

    Joseph Sedlar;Michael Tjernström;Thorsten Mauritsen;Matthew D. Shupe

  • The Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): Overview and experimental design

    Michael Tjernström;Caroline Leck;C. E. Birch;J. W. Bottenheim

  • Cloud and boundary layer interactions over the Arctic sea ice in late summer

    M. D. Shupe;P. O. G. Persson;I. M. Brooks;Michael Tjernström

  • Can new particle formation occur in the clean marine boundary layer

    Liisa Pirjola;Colin D. O'Dowd;Ian M. Brooks;Markku Kulmala

  • Warm-air advection, air mass transformation and fog causes rapid ice melt

    Michael Tjernström;Matthew D. Shupe;Matthew D. Shupe;Ian M. Brooks;P. Ola G. Persson;P. Ola G. Persson

  • The effect on thunderstorm charging of the rate of rime accretion by graupel

    I.M. Brooks;C.P.R. Saunders;R.P. Mitzeva;S.L. Peck

  • Meteorological conditions in the central Arctic summer during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS)

    Michael Tjernström;C. E. Birch;I. M. Brooks;M. D. Shupe

  • First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice

    Markus M. Frey;Sarah J. Norris;Ian M. Brooks;Philip S. Anderson

  • Observations of Strong Surface Radar Ducts over the Persian Gulf

    Ian M. Brooks;Andreas K. Goroch;David P. Rogers

  • Highlights of Coastal Waves 1996

    David P. Rogers;Clive E. Dorman;Kathleen A. Edwards;Ian M. Brooks

  • Wind Speed and Sea State Dependencies of Air‐Sea Gas Transfer: Results From the High Wind Speed Gas Exchange Study (HiWinGS)

    B. W. Blomquist;S. E. Brumer;C. W. Fairall;B. J. Huebert

  • The Turbulent Structure of the Arctic Summer Boundary Layer During The Arctic Summer Cloud-Ocean Study

    Ian M. Brooks;Michael Tjernström;P. Ola G. Persson;P. Ola G. Persson;Matthew D. Shupe;Matthew D. Shupe

  • A bird’s-eye view: Development of an operational ARM unmanned aerial capability for atmospheric research in Arctic Alaska

    Gijs de Boer;Mark Ivey;Beat Schmid;Dale Lawrence

  • Arctic Summer Airmass Transformation, Surface Inversions, and the Surface Energy Budget

    Michael Tjernström;Matthew D. Shupe;Matthew D. Shupe;Ian M. Brooks;Peggy Achtert;Peggy Achtert

  • The effects of high liquid water content on thunderstorm charging

    C. P. R. Saunders;I. M. Brooks

  • Status and Future of Numerical Atmospheric Aerosol Prediction with a Focus on Data Requirements

    Angela Benedetti;Jeffrey S. Reid;Peter Knippertz;John H. Marsham

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Tjernström
Michael Tjernström Stockholm University
Matthew D. Shupe
Matthew D. Shupe University of Colorado Boulder
Joseph Sedlar
Joseph Sedlar National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Byron Blomquist
Byron Blomquist University of Colorado Boulder
Caroline Leck
Caroline Leck Stockholm University
Michael H. Smith
Michael H. Smith University of Georgia
Thorsten Mauritsen
Thorsten Mauritsen Stockholm University
Daniel E. Wolfe
Daniel E. Wolfe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
P. Ola G. Persson
P. Ola G. Persson University of Colorado Boulder
Christopher W. Fairall
Christopher W. Fairall National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options offer flexible and affordable pathways. Professionals seeking advanced education might consider programs like an edd no dissertation option, which allows for doctoral-level achievement without the traditional dissertation burden. This is ideal for practitioners focused on applying research directly in their fields.

Transitioning from a master's to a doctorate is simplified through online eds to edd programs, providing a streamlined path for educators and environmental specialists aiming to elevate their qualifications. Meanwhile, for a career intersection with human services, the cheapest dsw program offers an accessible route to doctoral social work degrees, complementing environmental justice and community health interests.

Additionally, those wanting a broad-based education adaptable to multiple fields can explore an affordable online general studies degree. These programs provide versatile knowledge that supports diverse career pathways within and beyond environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Ian M. Brooks

Trending Scientists