World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Annica M. L. Ekman

Annica M. L. Ekman

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7424
World Ranking
6744
National Ranking
125

Annica M. L. Ekman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annica M. L. Ekman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Annica M. L. Ekman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annica M. L. Ekman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Annica M. L. Ekman is affiliated with Stockholm University in Sweden and conducts research primarily within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their main academic focus lies in Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional work in Automotive Engineering, Earth-Surface Processes, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's research prominently covers topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, climate variability and models, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, and vehicle emissions and performance.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Aerosols in current and future Arctic climate," 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • "Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "The ice-nucleating activity of Arctic sea surface microlayer samples and marine algal cultures," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ilona Riipinen
  • Radovan Krejčí
  • Roman Bardakov
  • Joel A. Thornton
  • Paul Zieger

The scientist's work is often published in journals such as:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Tellus B
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Climate

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications, including a policy brief titled "Policy brief: Integrating Nordic air quality and climate policies," published in 2023 by Nordic Council of Ministers eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5

    Xiaohong Liu;Richard C. Easter;Steven J. Ghan;Rahul A. Zaveri

  • EC-Earth A Seamless Earth-System Prediction Approach in Action

    Wilco Hazeleger;Camiel Severijns;Tido Semmler;Simona Ştefănescu

  • Aerosols in current and future Arctic climate

    Julia Schmale;Paul Zieger;Annica M. L. Ekman

  • Impact of anthropogenic aerosols on Indian summer monsoon

    Chien Wang;Dongchul Kim;Dongchul Kim;Annica M. L. Ekman;Mary C. Barth

  • Aerosol–climate interactions in the Norwegian Earth System Model – NorESM1-M

    A. Kirkevåg;T. Iversen;T. Iversen;Ø. Seland;C. Hoose;C. Hoose

  • Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation?

    U. Lohmann;L. Rotstayn;T. Storelvmo;A. Jones

  • Amplification of Arctic warming by past air pollution reductions in Europe

    J. C. Acosta Navarro;V. Varma;I. Riipinen;O. Seland

  • Role of air-mass transformations in exchange between the Arctic and mid-latitudes

    Felix Pithan;Gunilla Svensson;Rodrigo Caballero;Dmitry Chechin;Dmitry Chechin

  • Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives

    Johannes Quaas;Antti Arola;Brian Cairns;Matthew Christensen

  • The effect of sea ice loss on sea salt aerosol concentrations and the radiative balance in the Arctic

    H. Struthers;A. M. L. Ekman;P. Glantz;T. Iversen

  • Microphysical explanation of the RH-dependent water affinity of biogenic organic aerosol and its importance for climate

    N. Rastak;A. Pajunoja;J. C. Acosta Navarro;J. Ma

  • Global emissions of terpenoid VOCs from terrestrial vegetation in the last millennium

    J. C. Acosta Navarro;S. Smolander;Hamish Struthers;E. Zorita

  • 22 views of the global albedo—comparison between 20 GCMs and two satellites

    Frida A.-M. Bender;Henning Rodhe;Robert J. Charlson;Annica M. L. Ekman

  • Synergistic HNO3–H2SO4–NH3 upper tropospheric particle formation

    Unknown

  • Explicit simulation of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model : Aerosol transport and processing in the free troposphere

    Annica M. L. Ekman;Chien Wang;Johan Ström;Radovan Krejci

  • Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions

    Laura J. Wilcox;Zhen Liu;Bjørn Hallvard Samset;Ed Hawkins

  • Distribution and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in an interactive size-resolving aerosol-climate model

    Dongchul Kim;Chien Wang;Annica M. L. Ekman;Mary C. Barth

  • Do sophisticated parameterizations of aerosol-cloud interactions in CMIP5 models improve the representation of recent observed temperature trends?

    Annica M. L. Ekman

  • A model intercomparison of CCN-limited tenuous clouds in the high Arctic

    Robin G. Stevens;Katharina Loewe;Christopher Dearden;Christopher Dearden;Antonios Dimitrelos

  • Explicit simulations of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model: a sensitivity study based on an observed convective cloud

    A. M. L. Ekman;Chen Wang;J. Wilson;J. Ström

  • The Arctic summer atmosphere: an evaluation of reanalyses using ASCOS data

    Cevilia Wesslén;Michael Tjernström;D. H. Bromwich;G. de Boer;G. de Boer

  • Cloud response and feedback processes in stratiform mixed-phase clouds perturbed by ship exhaust

    Anna Possner;Anna Possner;Annica M. L. Ekman;Ulrike Lohmann

  • Accelerated increases in global and Asian summer monsoon precipitation from future aerosol reductions

    Laura Wilcox;Zhen Liu;Bjørn Samset;Ed Hawkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilona Riipinen
Ilona Riipinen Stockholm University
Michael Tjernström
Michael Tjernström Stockholm University
Radovan Krejci
Radovan Krejci Stockholm University
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Hans-Christen Hansson
Hans-Christen Hansson Stockholm University
Johan Ström
Johan Ström Stockholm University
Caroline Leck
Caroline Leck Stockholm University
Tristan L'Ecuyer
Tristan L'Ecuyer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alf Kirkevåg
Alf Kirkevåg Norwegian Meteorological Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that address today’s pressing ecological challenges. For example, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental data analysis and mapping. Exploring the best gis programs can equip students with technical skills to analyze spatial data effectively.

Leadership in environmental policy and public sector management is another vital area. Many professionals pursue an online mpa degrees to advance their careers in public administration and implement sustainable practices within government agencies.

Understanding social dynamics and human behavior is equally important when addressing environmental issues. Therefore, obtaining an online bachelors degree programs in sociology can provide insights into community engagement and policy impacts.

For those interested in advancing educational leadership without extensive research requirements, options like online edd no dissertation programs offer flexible pathways to lead environmental education initiatives effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Annica M. L. Ekman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles