World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maarten De Vos

Maarten De Vos

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14089
World Ranking
4304
National Ranking
51

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
13539
World Ranking
4051
National Ranking
45

Maarten De Vos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten De Vos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 228 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maarten De Vos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten De Vos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maarten De Vos is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has a research profile primarily focused on Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans various subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered in De Vos's research include:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting

De Vos has contributed publications to several frequent venues, such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Epilepsia

Recent papers authored or co-authored by De Vos include:

  • Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal, 2020, BMJ
  • SleepTransformer: Automatic Sleep Staging With Interpretability and Uncertainty Quantification, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • XSleepNet: Multi-View Sequential Model for Automatic Sleep Staging, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Towards More Accurate Automatic Sleep Staging via Deep Transfer Learning, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • Systematic review and critical appraisal of prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with De Vos include:

  • Christos Chatzichristos
  • Wim Van Paesschen
  • Katrien Jansen
  • Oliver Y. Chén
  • Elisabeth R. M. Heremans

Best Publications

  • How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk?

    Stefan Debener;Falk Minow;Reiner Emkes;Katharina Gandras

  • SeqSleepNet: End-to-End Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Network for Sequence-to-Sequence Automatic Sleep Staging

    Huy Phan;Fernando Andreotti;Navin Cooray;Oliver Y. Chen

  • Source Separation From Single-Channel Recordings by Combining Empirical-Mode Decomposition and Independent Component Analysis

    Bogdan Mijović;M De Vos;I Gligorijević;J Taelman

  • Joint Classification and Prediction CNN Framework for Automatic Sleep Stage Classification

    Huy Phan;Fernando Andreotti;Navin Cooray;Oliver Y. Chen

  • Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear

    Stefan Debener;Reiner Emkes;Maarten De Vos;Martin Bleichner

  • SleepTransformer: Automatic Sleep Staging with Interpretability and Uncertainty Quantification.

    Huy Phan;Kaare B. Mikkelsen;Oliver Y. Chén;Philipp Koch

  • Decoding the attended speech stream with multi-channel EEG: implications for online, daily-life applications

    Bojana Mirkovic;Stefan Debener;Manuela Jaeger;Maarten De Vos

  • XSleepNet: Multi-View Sequential Model for Automatic Sleep Staging.

    Huy Phan;Oliver Y. Chen;Minh C. Tran;Philipp Koch

  • Towards a truly mobile auditory brain–computer interface: Exploring the P300 to take away

    Maarten De Vos;Katharina Gandras;Stefan Debener

  • Neonatal Seizure Detection Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

    Amir Hossein Ansari;Perumpillichira J. Cherian;Perumpillichira J. Cherian;Alexander Caicedo;Gunnar Naulaers

  • Real-time EEG feedback during simultaneous EEG–fMRI identifies the cortical signature of motor imagery

    Catharina Zich;Stefan Debener;Cornelia Kranczioch;Martin G. Bleichner

  • Detecting Bipolar Depression From Geographic Location Data

    N. Palmius;A. Tsanas;K. E. A. Saunders;A. C. Bilderbeck

  • Daily longitudinal self-monitoring of mood variability in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder

    A. Tsanas;K.E.A. Saunders;A.C. Bilderbeck;N. Palmius

  • Canonical decomposition of ictal scalp EEG reliably detects the seizure onset zone

    M. De Vos;A. Vergult;L. De Lathauwer;W. De Clercq

  • Automated neonatal seizure detection mimicking a human observer reading EEG.

    W. Deburchgraeve;P.J. Cherian;M. De Vos;R.M. Swarte

  • Target Speaker Detection with Concealed EEG Around the Ear.

    Bojana Mirkovic;Martin G. Bleichner;Maarten De Vos;Stefan Debener

  • Comparing feature-based classifiers and convolutional neural networks to detect arrhythmia from short segments of ECG

    Fernando Andreotti;Oliver Carr;Marco A. F. Pimentel;Adam Mahdi

  • P300 speller BCI with a mobile EEG system: comparison to a traditional amplifier.

    Maarten De Vos;Markus Kroesen;Reiner Emkes;Stefan Debener

  • Review of sleep-EEG in preterm and term neonates.

    Anneleen Dereymaeker;Kirubin Pillay;Jan Vervisch;Maarten De Vos

  • Towards More Accurate Automatic Sleep Staging via Deep Transfer Learning

    Huy Phan;Oliver Y. Chen;Philipp Koch;Zongqing Lu

  • Cross-Modal Phase Reset Predicts Auditory Task Performance in Humans

    Jeremy D. Thorne;Maarten De Vos;Filipa Campos Viola;Stefan Debener

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Debener
Stefan Debener Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Alfred Mertins
Alfred Mertins University of Lübeck
Lieven Lagae
Lieven Lagae KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Maarten De Vos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles