World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ana S. L. Rodrigues

Ana S. L. Rodrigues

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
63
Citations
29932
World Ranking
1911
National Ranking
74

Ana S. L. Rodrigues publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana S. L. Rodrigues sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 108 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ana S. L. Rodrigues D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana S. L. Rodrigues sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ana S. L. Rodrigues is affiliated with the University of Montpellier in France. Their research predominantly centers on environmental science, with a focus on ecology, ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, and economics and econometrics. This multifaceted scope reflects a comprehensive approach to studying natural systems and conservation strategies.

Their publication record includes significant contributions to several prominent journals. Frequent venues for their research include Nature Communications, with six publications; bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), where four papers have been presented; Nature, with three published works; Conservation Letters with two papers; and Biological Conservation, also with two contributions.

The core topics addressed by their research span a wide range of ecological and environmental concerns. These include species distribution and climate change, wildlife ecology and conservation, ecology and vegetation dynamics, economic and environmental valuation, marine animal studies, isotope analysis in ecology, and animal ecology and behavior studies. These topics highlight a versatile engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of ecology and conservation science.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century" (2020) published in Nature
  • "How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented?" (2020) published in Conservation Letters
  • "The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness" (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • "A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets" (2021) published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Effectiveness of protected areas in conserving tropical forest birds" (2020) published in Nature Communications

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers in their field, notably frequently coauthoring with Victor Cazalis, Michael Hoffmann, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Andrea Manica, and James Watson. These collaborations have contributed to cross-disciplinary insights and the advancement of knowledge within environmental science and conservation.

Best Publications

  • Status and Trends of Amphibian Declines and Extinctions Worldwide

    Simon N. Stuart;Janice S. Chanson;Neil A. Cox;Bruce E. Young

  • Global biodiversity conservation priorities.

    T. M. Brooks;T. M. Brooks;T. M. Brooks;R. A. Mittermeier;G. A. B. da Fonseca;G. A. B. da Fonseca;J. Gerlach

  • Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity

    Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Sandy J. Andelman;Mohamed I. Bakarr;Luigi Boitani

  • The status of the world's land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge

    Jan Schipper;Jan Schipper;Janice S. Chanson;Janice S. Chanson;Federica Chiozza;Neil A. Cox;Neil A. Cox

  • The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates

    Michael Hoffmann;Craig Hilton-Taylor;Ariadne Angulo;Monika Böhm

  • The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation

    Ana S.L. Rodrigues;John D. Pilgrim;John F. Lamoreux;Michael Hoffmann

  • Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

    Sean L. Maxwell;Victor Cazalis;Nigel Dudley;Michael G. Hoffmann

  • Global Gap Analysis: Priority Regions for Expanding the Global Protected-Area Network

    Ana S. L. Rodrigues;H. Resit Akçakaya;Sandy J. Andelman;Mohamed I. Bakarr

  • Protected Areas and Effective Biodiversity Conservation

    Soizic Le Saout;Michael Hoffmann;Michael Hoffmann;Yichuan Shi;Yichuan Shi;Adrian Hughes

  • Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions

    Taylor H. Ricketts;Eric Dinerstein;Tim Boucher;Thomas M. Brooks

  • Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates

    Ana S.L. Rodrigues;Thomas M. Brooks

  • Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives.

    Nicolas Mouquet;Vincent Devictor;Christine N. Meynard;Francois Munoz

  • Global congruence of carbon storage and biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems

    Bernardo B.N. Strassburg;Annabel Kelly;Andrew Balmford;Richard G. Davies

  • Coverage Provided by the Global Protected-Area System: Is It Enough?

    Thomas M. Brooks;Mohamed I. Bakarr;Tim Boucher;Gustavo A. B. Da Fonseca

  • Boom-and-Bust Development Patterns Across the Amazon Deforestation Frontier

    Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Robert M. Ewers;Luke Parry;Carlos Souza

  • Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas

    Ana S.L Rodrigues;Kevin J Gaston

  • Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage

    Robert M. Ewers;Robert M. Ewers;Robert M. Ewers;Ana S.L. Rodrigues

  • Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species

    H. Resit Akçakaya;H. Resit Akçakaya;Elizabeth L. Bennett;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Molly K. Grace

  • Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale?

    Aletta Bonn;Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Kevin J. Gaston

  • Bringing Ecosystem Services into the Real World: An Operational Framework for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Losing Wild Nature

    Andrew Balmford;Brendan Fisher;Brendan Fisher;Rhys E. Green;Rhys E. Green;Robin Naidoo

  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented

    Friederike C. Bolam;Louise Mair;Marco Angelico;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks

  • The changing fates of the world's mammals

    Michael Hoffmann;Jerrold L. Belant;Janice S. Chanson;Neil A. Cox;Neil A. Cox

  • Response to Comment on "Status and Trends of Amphibian Declines and Extinctions Worldwide"

    Simon N. Stuart;Janice S. Chanson;Neil A. Cox;Bruce E. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Michael R. Hoffmann
Michael R. Hoffmann California Institute of Technology
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Simon N. Stuart
Simon N. Stuart Synchronicity Earth
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Stuart H. M. Butchart BirdLife international, UK
Andrea Manica
Andrea Manica University of Cambridge
Bernardo B. N. Strassburg
Bernardo B. N. Strassburg International Institute for Sustainability (IIS)
Piero Visconti
Piero Visconti International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca
Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Carlo Rondinini
Carlo Rondinini Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Ecology and Evolution graduates often explore related fields to broaden their professional options. Many pursue further study in healthcare, education, or research—sometimes via flexible online routes.

For those interested in communication disorders, there are accredited speech pathology programs available online, which meet strict professional standards. Even students without a prior background in speech-language pathology can access speech pathology bridge programs online to help them transition into the field.

If you’re drawn to nursing, several online absn programs for non nurses offer an affordable and accelerated path to a bachelor’s in nursing—even for those with unrelated degrees.

Advancing further, becoming a psychiatric nurse practitioner opens rewarding and well-compensated roles; you can explore earning potential by reviewing pmhnp salary by state. Each pathway enhances your expertise and career versatility in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ana S. L. Rodrigues

Trending Scientists