World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
93
Citations
34719
World Ranking
980
National Ranking
76

N. Jon Shah publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where N. Jon Shah sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 598 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

N. Jon Shah D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where N. Jon Shah sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

N. Jon Shah is affiliated with Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience, particularly within radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Their research encompasses several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neurology, and spectroscopy.

Their work primarily addresses topics such as advanced MRI techniques and applications, functional brain connectivity studies, and medical imaging techniques. They have also focused on glioma diagnosis and treatment, advanced neuroimaging techniques, neural dynamics, and brain function, as well as advanced NMR techniques and applications.

Among their recent publications are:

  • PET/MRI Radiomics in Patients With Brain Metastases, 2020, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Microglial activation and blood-brain barrier permeability in cerebral small vessel disease, 2021, Brain
  • Radiomics in neuro-oncology: Basics, workflow, and applications, 2020, Methods
  • FET PET Radiomics for Differentiating Pseudoprogression from Early Tumor Progression in Glioma Patients Post-Chemoradiation, 2020, Cancers
  • Imaging the Pathophysiology of Essential Tremor-A Systematic Review, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology

Their frequent collaborators include Karl-Josef Langen, Philipp Lohmann, Norbert Galldiks, Gereon R. Fink, and Martin Köcher, illustrating a strong network in their research community.

Their research has been published in numerous venues, with notable contributions to:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge

    Spyridon Bakas;Mauricio Reyes;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer

  • Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective.

    Kai Vogeley;Patrick Bussfeld;Albert Newen;S. Herrmann

  • Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps

    K. Amunts;O. Kedo;M. Kindler;P. Pieperhoff

  • BigBrain: An Ultrahigh-Resolution 3D Human Brain Model

    Katrin Amunts;Claude Lepage;Louis Borgeat;Hartmut Mohlberg

  • Polymodal Motion Processing in Posterior Parietal and Premotor Cortex: A Human fMRI Study Strongly Implies Equivalencies between Humans and Monkeys

    Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer;Anja Schlack;Anja Schlack;N.Jon Shah;Oliver Zafiris

  • Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy.

    Martin Schulte-Rüther;Hans J. Markowitsch;N. Jon Shah;Gereon R. Fink

  • Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: an fMRI study.

    Tony W Buchanan;Kai Lutz;Shahram Mirzazade;Karsten Specht

  • Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction.

    Leonhard Schilbach;Afra M. Wohlschlaeger;Nicole C. Kraemer;Albert Newen

  • Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry

    Leonhard Schilbach;Marcus Wilms;Simon B. Eickhoff;Sandro Romanzetti

  • Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI

    G. R. Fink;J. C. Marshall;N. J. Shah;P. H. Weiss

  • Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists.

    L Jäncke;N.J Shah;M Peters

  • Analysis of neural mechanisms underlying verbal fluency in cytoarchitectonically defined stereotaxic space--the roles of Brodmann areas 44 and 45.

    Katrin Amunts;Peter H. Weiss;Peter H. Weiss;Hartmut Mohlberg;Peter Pieperhoff

  • Subcortical Correlates of Craving in Recently Abstinent Alcoholic Patients

    Frank Schneider;Ute Habel;Michael Wagner;Petra Franke

  • The neural correlates of person familiarity. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study with clinical implications.

    Nadim J. Shah;John C. Marshall;Oliver Zafiris;Anna Schwab

  • Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli.

    L Jäncke;R Loose;K Lutz;K Specht

  • Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: Effects of practice and expertise

    Stefan Vogt;Giovanni Buccino;Afra M. Wohlschläger;Nicola Canessa

  • Advances in neuro-oncology imaging

    Karl-Josef Langen;Karl-Josef Langen;Norbert Galldiks;Norbert Galldiks;Elke Hattingen;Nadim Jon Shah;Nadim Jon Shah;Nadim Jon Shah

  • Neural Representations of Self versus Other: Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking and Agency in a Virtual Ball-tossing Game

    Nicole David;Bettina H. Bewernick;Michael X. Cohen;Albert Newen

  • Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects.

    Lutz Jäncke;Shahram Mirzazade;Nadim Joni Shah

  • Gender differences in the cognitive control of emotion: An fMRI study

    Kathrin Koch;Katharina Pauly;Thilo Kellermann;Nina Y. Seiferth

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl-Josef Langen
Karl-Josef Langen Forschungszentrum Jülich
Tony Stöcker
Tony Stöcker German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Ute Habel
Ute Habel RWTH Aachen University
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
Thilo Kellermann
Thilo Kellermann RWTH Aachen University
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Axel Krug
Axel Krug Philipp University of Marburg
Lutz Tellmann
Lutz Tellmann Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing N. Jon Shah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles