World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4196 3875 189 186 156 12749

Leonhard Schilbach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leonhard Schilbach between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leonhard Schilbach published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2022. 29 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2022. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 15 publications
2005 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leonhard Schilbach: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 3
2009 1
2010 5
2011 8
2012 12
2013 15
2014 15
2015 10
2016 13
2017 9
2018 9
2019 13
2020 18
2021 11
2022 23
2023 17
2024 14
2025 15
Total 215
Download as CSV

Leonhard Schilbach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonhard Schilbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Leonhard Schilbach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonhard Schilbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leonhard Schilbach is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans primarily the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a notable focus on cognitive neuroscience and clinical psychology as key subfields. The academic work also covers social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Schilbach's main topics of research include autism spectrum disorder studies, functional brain connectivity, and mental health topics. Additional research areas involve neural and behavioral psychology, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and action observation and synchronization.

The scholar has contributed to various publication venues multiple times. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Autism
  • Scientific Reports

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Leonhard Schilbach include:

  • "10,000 social brains: Sex differentiation in human brain anatomy," 2020, Science Advances
  • "Aberrant computational mechanisms of social learning and decision-making in schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder," 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "Interpersonal similarity of autistic traits predicts friendship quality," 2020, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • "Atypical processing of uncertainty in individuals at risk for psychosis," 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Unobtrusive tracking of interpersonal orienting and distance predicts the subjective quality of social interactions," 2020, Royal Society Open Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schilbach are:

  • Daniel Kamp
  • Juha M. Lahnakoski
  • Marie-Luise Brandi
  • Lara Henco
  • Laura Albantakis

Best Publications

  • Toward a second-person neuroscience.

    Leonhard Schilbach;Bert Timmermans;Vasudevi Reddy;Alan Costall

  • Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the ''default system" of the brain

    Leo Schilbach;Simon B. Eickhoff;Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Gereon R. Fink

  • Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction

    Elizabeth Redcay;Leonhard Schilbach

  • Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy.

    Danilo Bzdok;Leonhard Schilbach;Kai Vogeley;Karla Schneider

  • Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction.

    Leonhard Schilbach;Afra M. Wohlschlaeger;Nicole C. Kraemer;Albert Newen

  • Minds made for sharing: Initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry

    Leonhard Schilbach;Marcus Wilms;Simon B. Eickhoff;Sandro Romanzetti

  • Characterization of the temporo-parietal junction by combining data-driven parcellation, complementary connectivity analyses, and functional decoding

    Danilo Bzdok;Robert Langner;Leonhard Schilbach;Oliver Jakobs

  • Towards a second-person neuropsychiatry.

    Leonhard Schilbach

  • From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking: Novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction

    Ulrich J. Pfeiffer;Kai Vogeley;Leonhard Schilbach

  • Introspective Minds: Using ALE Meta-Analyses to Study Commonalities in the Neural Correlates of Emotional Processing, Social & Unconstrained Cognition

    Leonhard Schilbach;Danilo Bzdok;Bert Timmermans;Peter T. Fox

  • Beyond Autism: Introducing the Dialectical Misattunement Hypothesis and a Bayesian Account of Intersubjectivity.

    Dimitris Bolis;Joshua Balsters;Nicole Wenderoth;Cristina Becchio

  • Definition and characterization of an extended social-affective default network

    Maren Amft;Danilo Bzdok;Angela R. Laird;Angela R. Laird;Peter T. Fox;Peter T. Fox

  • Segregation of the human medial prefrontal cortex in social cognition.

    Danilo Bzdok;Robert Langner;Leonhard Schilbach;Denis A. Engemann

  • It’s in your eyes—using gaze-contingent stimuli to create truly interactive paradigms for social cognitive and affective neuroscience

    Marcus Wilms;Leonhard Schilbach;Ulrich Pfeiffer;Gary Bente

  • Eye to eye, face to face and brain to brain: novel approaches to study the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of social interactions

    Leonhard Schilbach

  • Why we interact: On the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction

    Ulrich J. Pfeiffer;Leonhard Schilbach;Bert Timmermans;Bojana Kuzmanovic

  • What's in a smile? Neural correlates of facial embodiment during social interaction.

    Leonhard Schilbach;Simon B. Eickhoff;Andreas Mojzisch;Kai Vogeley

  • A second-person approach to other minds

    Leonhard Schilbach

  • Interpersonal predictive coding, not action perception, is impaired in autism.

    T. von der Lühe;V. Manera;I. Barisic;C. Becchio;C. Becchio

  • Higher order thoughts in action: consciousness as an unconscious re-description process.

    Bert Timmermans;Leonhard Schilbach;Antoine Pasquali;Axel Cleeremans

Frequent Co-Authors

Kai Vogeley
Kai Vogeley University of Cologne
Gary Bente
Gary Bente Michigan State University
Simon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Danilo Bzdok
Danilo Bzdok Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Cristina Becchio
Cristina Becchio Italian Institute of Technology
Marc Tittgemeyer
Marc Tittgemeyer Max Planck Society
Christoph Mathys
Christoph Mathys Aarhus University
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Katrin H. Preller
Katrin H. Preller University of Zurich
Angela R. Laird
Angela R. Laird Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which can be pursued through flexible online study. One of the most meaningful roles is in addiction counseling. Those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Seattle will need to meet specific state requirements, including educational credentials and supervised experience.

Requirements can vary widely by location. For example, aspiring professionals seeking substance abuse counselor requirements in Spokane must adhere to Washington State regulations, which may differ slightly even within the same state. It's important to check local guidelines to ensure you meet licensure criteria.

Career opportunities extend beyond Washington. For those considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis, Missouri presents another set of educational and certification standards focused on clinical skill and ethical practice. Meanwhile, learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in St. Petersburg highlights the pathways and practical steps for entering this field in Florida.

Online psychology degrees can provide a strong foundation for these pathways, making it easier to balance study with other commitments. These degrees often offer specialized coursework in addiction studies, counseling techniques, and mental health, helping graduates qualify for rewarding and impactful careers across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Leonhard Schilbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles