World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc Tittgemeyer

Marc Tittgemeyer

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
9002
World Ranking
4972
National Ranking
419

Marc Tittgemeyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Tittgemeyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marc Tittgemeyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Tittgemeyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Tittgemeyer is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems.

The researcher's focus is evidenced by contributions to topics such as:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Marc Tittgemeyer has published numerous articles with recent notable papers including:

  • "Gut-brain communication by distinct sensory neurons differently controls feeding and glucose metabolism," 2021, Cell Metabolism
  • "Network degeneration in Parkinson's disease: multimodal imaging of nigro-striato-cortical dysfunction," 2020, Brain
  • "Habitual daily intake of a sweet and fatty snack modulates reward processing in humans," 2023, Cell Metabolism
  • "The default mode network and cognition in Parkinson's disease: A multimodal resting-state network approach," 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • "The structural connectivity of subthalamic deep brain stimulation correlates with impulsivity in Parkinson's disease," 2020, Brain

Frequent collaborators with whom Marc Tittgemeyer has co-authored publications include:

  • Lars Timmermann
  • Carsten Eggers
  • Alexander Drzezga
  • Thilo van Eimeren
  • Bojana Kuzmanovic

The bulk of their publications have appeared in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Brain
  • npj Parkinson s Disease
  • Cell Metabolism

Best Publications

  • Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Broca's Area

    A Anwander;M Tittgemeyer;DY von Cramon;AD Friederici

  • Allostatic Self-Efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression

    Klaas Enno Stephan;Zina Mary Manjaly;Christoph Daniel Mathys;Lilian A.E. Weber

  • Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas

    Claudia Danielmeier;Tom Eichele;Birte U. Forstmann;Marc Tittgemeyer

  • Current directions in the auricular vagus nerve stimulation I - A physiological perspective

    Eugenijus Kaniusas;Stefan Kampusch;Marc Tittgemeyer;Marc Tittgemeyer;Fivos Panetsos

  • The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: a structural model-based approach.

    Birte U. Forstmann;Marc Tittgemeyer;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Jan Derrfuss

  • Supra-Additive Effects of Combining Fat and Carbohydrate on Food Reward

    Alexandra G. DiFeliceantonio;Géraldine Coppin;Géraldine Coppin;Lionel Rigoux;Lionel Rigoux;Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah

  • Towards a standard analysis for functional near-infrared imaging.

    Matthias L Schroeter;Markus M Bücheler;Karsten Müller;Kâmil Uludağ;Kâmil Uludağ

  • The brain in myotonic dystrophy 1 and 2: Evidence for a predominant white matter disease

    Martina Minnerop;Bernd Weber;Jan-Christoph Schoene-Bake;Sandra Roeske

  • Connectivity Profile Predictive of Effective Deep Brain Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

    Juan Carlos Baldermann;Corina Melzer;Alexandra Zapf;Sina Kohl

  • Predicting errors from reconfiguration patterns in human brain networks

    Matthias Ekman;Jan Derrfuss;Marc Tittgemeyer;Christian J. Fiebach

  • Gut-brain communication by distinct sensory neurons differently controls feeding and glucose metabolism

    Diba Borgmann;Elisa Ciglieri;Nasim Biglari;Claus Brandt

  • Investigating Structural Brain Changes of Dehydration Using Voxel-Based Morphometry

    Daniel Paolo Streitbürger;Harald E. Möller;Marc Tittgemeyer;Margret Hund-Georgiadis

  • Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models

    Klaas Enno Stephan;Marc Tittgemeyer;Thomas R. Knösche;Rosalyn J. Moran

  • Degeneration of corpus callosum and recovery of motor function after stroke: A multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study

    Ling E. Wang;Marc Tittgemeyer;Davide Imperati;Svenja Diekhoff

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.

    Stefanie Hoffmann;Marc Tittgemeyer;D. Yves von Cramon

  • White-matter abnormalities in Tourette syndrome extend beyond motor pathways

    Irene Neuner;Yuliya Kupriyanova;Tony Stöcker;Ruiwang Huang

  • The first evaluation of brain shift during functional neurosurgery by deformation field analysis

    Dirk Winkler;Marc Tittgemeyer;J. Schwarz;Christoph Preul

  • Cerebellar networks with basal ganglia: feasibility for tracking cerebello‐pallidal and subthalamo‐cerebellar projections in the human brain

    Esther Annegret Pelzer;Andreas Hintzen;Mathias Goldau;Detlev Yves von Cramon

  • Food Intake Recruits Orosensory and Post-ingestive Dopaminergic Circuits to Affect Eating Desire in Humans

    Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah;Heiko Backes;Alexandra DiFeliceantonio;Kerstin Albus

  • Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation II - An Engineering Perspective.

    Eugenijus Kaniusas;Stefan Kampusch;Marc Tittgemeyer;Fivos Panetsos

  • Anatomical and functional parcellation of the human lateral premotor cortex

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;Alfred Anwander;Thomas R. Knösche;D. Yves von Cramon

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaas E. Stephan
Klaas E. Stephan University of Zurich
Lars Timmermann
Lars Timmermann Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Friedemann Wenzel
Friedemann Wenzel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Bernd Weber
Bernd Weber University of Bonn
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Trond Ryberg
Trond Ryberg University of Potsdam
Jens C. Brüning
Jens C. Brüning Max Planck Society
Karl Fuchs
Karl Fuchs Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Christian Grefkes
Christian Grefkes University of Cologne
D. Yves von Cramon
D. Yves von Cramon Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Neuroscience degree in the USA opens the door to several complementary and alternative career paths. Many students consider graduate programs in mental health, psychology, or counseling for broader career flexibility. For instance, accelerated msw programs are ideal for those interested in social work and mental health advocacy, offering quicker completion times for motivated learners.

If you prefer a psychology-focused track, a 2-year psychology degree online can be a time-efficient way to deepen your understanding of human behavior and cognitive science. Those looking for affordable education will find options like the cheapest online counseling degree, which enables you to enter the counseling profession without accumulating significant debt.

For advanced learners, there are flexible online masters counseling programs—perfect for those aiming to become licensed counselors or therapists. These diverse online degrees complement a neuroscience background, equipping graduates with practical skills to work in healthcare, research, counseling, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Tittgemeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles