World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8981 8390 193 189 168 4311

Agnieszka Wykowska publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Agnieszka Wykowska between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Agnieszka Wykowska published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2023. 65 of the 280 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2023. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 31 publications
2007 2025

280 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Agnieszka Wykowska: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 3
2012 6
2013 4
2014 7
2015 5
2016 1
2017 8
2018 12
2019 23
2020 25
2021 39
2022 33
2023 40
2024 34
2025 31
Total 280
Download as CSV

Agnieszka Wykowska publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnieszka Wykowska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Agnieszka Wykowska D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnieszka Wykowska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Agnieszka Wykowska is affiliated with the Italian Institute of Technology in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology as significant subfields. Additional areas of expertise include Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Safety Research.

The scientist's main topics of investigation encompass:

  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Agnieszka Wykowska has published extensively, with frequent appearances in the following publication venues:

  • International Journal of Social Robotics
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Scientific Reports
  • Science Robotics
  • Technology Mind and Behavior

Key recent papers include:

  • "Social Robots to Test Flexibility of Human Social Cognition" (2020), International Journal of Social Robotics
  • "Risk Perception and Media in Shaping Protective Behaviors: Insights From the Early Phase of COVID-19 Italian Outbreak" (2020), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The human brain reveals resting state activity patterns that are predictive of biases in attitudes toward robots" (2020), Science Robotics
  • "The personality of anthropomorphism: How the need for cognition and the need for closure define attitudes and anthropomorphic attributions toward robots" (2021), Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Robots as Mirrors of the Human Mind" (2021), Current Directions in Psychological Science

Agnieszka Wykowska has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Davide De Tommaso
  • Serena Marchesi
  • Davide Ghiglino
  • Francesca Ciardo
  • Kyveli Kompatsiari

The scientist has also contributed to academic books, notably a publication titled "Social Robotics" released in 2021 by Springer Science+Business Media.

Best Publications

  • Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social.

    Eva Wiese;Giorgio Metta;Agnieszka Wykowska

  • I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others

    Eva Wiese;Agnieszka Wykowska;Jan Zwickel;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller

  • Do We Adopt the Intentional Stance Toward Humanoid Robots

    Serena Marchesi;Davide Ghiglino;Davide Ghiglino;Francesca Ciardo;Jairo Perez-Osorio

  • Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Agnieszka Wykowska;Thierry Chaminade;Gordon Cheng

  • Beliefs about the Minds of Others Influence How We Process Sensory Information

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Agnieszka Wykowska;Eva Wiese;Eva Wiese;Aaron Prosser;Aaron Prosser;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller

  • How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Anna Schubö;Bernhard Hommel

  • From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction

    Emily S. Cross;Ruud Hortensius;Agnieszka Wykowska

  • Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition

    Pauline Chevalier;Kyveli Kompatsiari;Francesca Ciardo;Agnieszka Wykowska

  • It’s in the Eyes: The Engaging Role of Eye Contact in HRI

    Kyveli Kompatsiari;Kyveli Kompatsiari;Francesca Ciardo;Vadim Tikhanoff;Giorgio Metta;Giorgio Metta

  • The personality of anthropomorphism: How the need for cognition and the need for closure define attitudes and anthropomorphic attributions toward robots

    Unknown

  • iCub: The not-yet-finished story of building a robot child

    Lorenzo Natale;Chiara Bartolozzi;Daniele Pucci;Agnieszka Wykowska

  • Social Robots to Test Flexibility of Human Social Cognition

    Agnieszka Wykowska

  • Attribution of intentional agency towards robots reduces one's own sense of agency.

    Francesca Ciardo;Frederike Beyer;Davide De Tommaso;Agnieszka Wykowska

  • On the role of eye contact in gaze cueing.

    Kyveli Kompatsiari;Kyveli Kompatsiari;Francesca Ciardo;Vadim Tikhanoff;Giorgio Metta;Giorgio Metta

  • On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Anna Schubö

  • Risk Perception and Media in Shaping Protective Behaviors: Insights From the Early Phase of COVID-19 Italian Outbreak.

    Benedetta Vai;Silvia Cazzetta;Davide Ghiglino;Lorenzo Parenti

  • Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Anna Schubö

  • The human brain reveals resting state activity patterns that are predictive of biases in attitudes toward robots

    Francesco Bossi;Francesco Bossi;Cesco Willemse;Jacopo Cavazza;Serena Marchesi

  • Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity : Investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs)

    Anna Schubö;Agnieszka Wykowska;Hermann J. Müller

  • Robots as Mirrors of the Human Mind

    Agnieszka Wykowska

  • Believing androids : fMRI activation in the right temporo-parietal junction is modulated by ascribing intentions to non-human agents

    Ceylan Özdem;Eva Wiese;Agnieszka Wykowska;Hermann J. Müller

  • Humans are Well Tuned to Detecting Agents Among Non-agents: Examining the Sensitivity of Human Perception to Behavioral Characteristics of Intentional Systems

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Agnieszka Wykowska;Jasmin Kajopoulos;Miguel Obando-Leitón;Sushil Singh Chauhan

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann J. Müller
Hermann J. Müller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Anna Schubö
Anna Schubö Philipp University of Marburg
Giorgio Metta
Giorgio Metta Italian Institute of Technology
Gordon Cheng
Gordon Cheng Technical University of Munich
Vittorio Murino
Vittorio Murino University of Verona
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
Stefan Kopp
Stefan Kopp Bielefeld University
Marcel Brass
Marcel Brass Ghent University
Shuzhi Sam Ge
Shuzhi Sam Ge National University of Singapore
Emily S. Cross
Emily S. Cross University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and dynamic career opportunities, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Online psychology programs provide flexibility for working adults, allowing you to study at your own pace and often enabling you to pursue licensure or certification faster.

For those seeking the quickest route to becoming a counselor, it's helpful to look at state-specific requirements and accelerated options. Discover the fastest way to become a counselor in Arkansas and compare it with the shortest path to becoming a counselor in California to see how program structure and licensing requirements may differ.

Many states now offer online and hybrid pathways. For example, students interested in Colorado accelerated counseling programs or Connecticut accelerated counseling programs will find condensed formats designed to help them qualify for their chosen field more efficiently.

Whether you’re aiming for a career in counseling, research, or human services, online degree options make it easier than ever to access the education and credentials you need for success in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Agnieszka Wykowska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles