World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Genevieve McArthur

Genevieve McArthur

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8872 8284 519 508 142 6140

Genevieve McArthur publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Genevieve McArthur between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Genevieve McArthur published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 21 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications
1995 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Genevieve McArthur: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 5
2006 1
2007 2
2008 8
2009 10
2010 11
2011 2
2012 20
2013 11
2014 2
2015 11
2016 6
2017 6
2018 9
2019 4
2020 10
2021 7
2022 4
2023 7
2024 9
2025 12
Total 175
Download as CSV

Genevieve McArthur publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Genevieve McArthur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 142
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Genevieve McArthur D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Genevieve McArthur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Genevieve McArthur is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Psychology, Neuroscience, and Social Sciences. Within these main fields, their work concentrates on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research topics cover a range of themes, including Reading and Literacy Development, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Child Development and Digital Technology, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Youth Substance Use and School Attendance, Text Readability and Simplification, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development.

Genevieve McArthur has published research in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include PeerJ, Reading Research Quarterly, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Annals of Dyslexia, and PLoS ONE.

The following recent papers illustrate the scope of their research contributions:

  • Self-concept in poor readers: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, PeerJ
  • Using Eye-Tracking Measures to Predict Reading Comprehension, 2023, Reading Research Quarterly
  • A validation of Emotiv EPOC Flex saline for EEG and ERP research, 2020, PeerJ
  • 10 years of EPOC: A scoping review of Emotiv's portable EEG device, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • A scoping review on the use of consumer-grade EEG devices for research, 2024, PLoS ONE

Frequent collaborators in their research include Serje Robidoux, Nicholas A. Badcock, Deanna Francis, Nikolas Williams, and Saskia Kohnen.

Best Publications

  • On the "Specifics" of Specific Reading Disability and Specific Language Impairment

    G.M. Mcarthur;John Hogben;V.T. Edwards;S.M. Heath

  • Validation of the Emotiv EPOC® EEG gaming system for measuring research quality auditory ERPs

    Nicholas A. Badcock;Petroula Mousikou;Petroula Mousikou;Yatin Mahajan;Peter de Lissa

  • Auditory perceptual processing in people with reading and oral language impairments: current issues and recommendations.

    G.M. McArthur;D.V.M. Bishop

  • Which People with Specific Language Impairment have Auditory Processing Deficits

    Genevieve M. McArthur;D. V.M. Bishop

  • Individual differences in auditory processing in specific language impairment: a follow-up study using event-related potentials and behavioural thresholds.

    Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Genevieve M. McArthur

  • Speech and non-speech processing in people with specific language impairment: a behavioural and electrophysiological study.

    G.M. McArthur;D.V.M. Bishop

  • The association between poor reading and internalising problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Deanna A. Francis;Nathan Caruana;Jennifer L. Hudson;Genevieve M. McArthur

  • Phonics training for English‐speaking poor readers

    Genevieve McArthur;Philippa M. Eve;Kristy Jones;Erin Banales

  • Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children

    Nicholas A. Badcock;Kathryn A. Preece;Bianca de Wit;Katharine Glenn

  • Immature cortical responses to auditory stimuli in specific language impairment: evidence from ERPs to rapid tone sequences

    Dorothy V.M. Bishop;G. M. McArthur

  • Assessing the basic components of reading: A revision of the Castles and Coltheart test with new norms

    Anne Castles;Max Coltheart;Linda Larsen;Pip Jones

  • Auditory processing deficits in children with reading and language impairments: can they (and should they) be treated?

    G.M. McArthur;D. Ellis;C.M. Atkinson;M. Coltheart

  • Sight Word and Phonics Training in Children With Dyslexia

    Genevieve McArthur;Anne Castles;Saskia Kohnen;Linda Larsen

  • Frequency discrimination deficits in people with specific language impairment: reliability, validity, and linguistic correlates.

    G. M. McArthur;D. V. M. Bishop

  • Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?

    Kathleen A. Sheehan;Genevieve M. McArthur;Dorothy V.M. Bishop

  • Auditory backward recognition masking in children with a specific language impairment and children with a specific reading disability

    G.M. Mcarthur;John Hogben

  • The attentional blink and P300.

    Genevieve McArthur;Timothy Budd;Patricia Michie

  • When ‘slime’ becomes ‘smile’ : developmental letter position dyslexia in English

    Saskia Kohnen;Lyndsey Nickels;Anne Castles;Naama Friedmann;Naama Friedmann

  • Are the literacy difficulties that characterize developmental dyslexia associated with a failure to integrate letters and speech sounds

    Hannah M. Nash;Debbie Gooch;Charles Hulme;Yatin Mahajan

  • Atypical brain responses to sounds in children with specific language and reading impairments

    Genevieve McArthur;Carmen Atkinson;Danielle Ellis

  • Australian comparison data for the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE)

    Eva Marinus;Saskia Kohnen;Genevieve McArthur

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Castles
Anne Castles Macquarie University
Max Coltheart
Max Coltheart Macquarie University
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Dorothy V. M. Bishop
Dorothy V. M. Bishop University of Oxford
Romina Palermo
Romina Palermo University of Western Australia
William Forde Thompson
William Forde Thompson Bond University
Blake W. Johnson
Blake W. Johnson Macquarie University
Stephen Crain
Stephen Crain Macquarie University
Kathryn N. North
Kathryn N. North University of Melbourne
Kate Nation
Kate Nation University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of career pathways, including becoming a licensed therapist. Many students begin with a bachelor’s in psychology before moving on to a master’s or doctoral program, which are often required for clinical roles.

For those interested in counseling, requirements can differ greatly by location. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Irvine or how to become a licensed therapist in Irving both require a mix of graduate study, supervised clinical experience, and passing state exams. Some regions may place greater emphasis on certain internship hours or accreditation.

It’s important to review specific state requirements before enrolling. For instance, you can research licensed therapist requirements in Jacksonville or look into Jersey City licensed therapist education requirements to ensure you’re on the right track. Online degrees in psychology can also provide flexibility, but always make sure your program is properly accredited for your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Genevieve McArthur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles