World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bart Boets

Bart Boets

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7775
World Ranking
8174
National Ranking
117

Bart Boets publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Boets sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bart Boets D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Boets sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bart Boets is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and conducts research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Within these areas, they have contributed extensively to subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Pharmacy, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research focuses on topics such as neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and autism spectrum disorder research. Additional areas of interest in their work include infant health and development, face recognition and perception, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and the neuroscience of respiration and sleep.

Bart Boets has co-authored numerous publications with frequent collaborators such as Jean Steyaert, Stephanie Van der Donck, Kaat Alaerts, Matthijs Moerkerke, and Nicky Daniëls.

The scientist has published papers in various academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Molecular Autism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Autism Research

Notable recent papers include:

  • Behavioral effects of multiple-dose oxytocin treatment in autism: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up (2020, Molecular Autism)
  • Autism spectrum disorder and pupillometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Endogenous Oxytocin Levels in Autism-A Meta-Analysis (2021, Brain Sciences)
  • Effects of multiple-dose intranasal oxytocin administration on social responsiveness in children with autism: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (2023, Molecular Autism)
  • Rapid neural categorization of angry and fearful faces is specifically impaired in boys with autism spectrum disorder (2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry)

Best Publications

  • Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism.

    Sander Van de Cruys;Kris Evers;Ruth Van der Hallen;Lien Van Eylen

  • Working Memory and Individual Differences in Mathematics Achievement: A Longitudinal Study from First Grade to Second Grade.

    Bert De Smedt;Rianne Janssen;Kelly Bouwens;Lieven Verschaffel

  • Intact but less Accessible Phonetic Representations in Adults with Dyslexia

    Bart Boets;Hans P. Op de Beeck;Maaike Vandermosten;Sophie K. Scott

  • A qualitative and quantitative review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in reading and dyslexia

    Maaike Vandermosten;Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Pol Ghesquière

  • A tractography study in dyslexia: neuroanatomic correlates of orthographic, phonological and speech processing

    Maaike Vandermosten;Bart Boets;Hanne Poelmans;Stefan Sunaert

  • Auditory processing, speech perception and phonological ability in pre-school children at high-risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study of the auditory temporal processing theory

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Pol Ghesquière

  • Preschool impairments in auditory processing and speech perception uniquely predict future reading problems

    Bart Boets;Maaike Vandermosten;Hanne Poelmans;Heleen Luts

  • Modelling Relations between Sensory Processing, Speech Perception, Orthographic and Phonological Ability, and Literacy Achievement.

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Bert De Smedt

  • Cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorder: Explaining the inconsistencies?

    Lien Van Eylen;Bart Boets;Jean Steyaert;Kris Evers

  • Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: evidence from developmental dyslexia.

    Bert De Smedt;Bart Boets

  • A review of behavioural and electrophysiological studies on auditory processing and speech perception in autism spectrum disorders

    Birgitt Haesen;Bart Boets;Johan Wagemans

  • Towards a further characterization of phonological and literacy problems in Dutch-speaking children with dyslexia

    Bart Boets;Bert de Smedt;Leen Cleuren;Ellen Vandewalle

  • Altered functional connectivity of the language network in ASD: Role of classical language areas and cerebellum

    Marjolein Verly;Judith Verhoeven;Inge Zink;Dante Mantini

  • Adults with dyslexia are impaired in categorizing speech and nonspeech sounds on the basis of temporal cues

    Maaike Vandermosten;Bart Boets;Heleen Luts;Hanne Poelmans

  • Executive functioning in autism spectrum disorders: influence of task and sample characteristics and relation to symptom severity

    Lien Van Eylen;Bart Boets;Jean Steyaert;Johan Wagemans

  • Auditory Temporal Information Processing in Preschool Children at Family Risk for Dyslexia: Relations with Phonological Abilities and Developing Literacy Skills.

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Pol Ghesquière

  • Impairments in speech and nonspeech sound categorization in children with dyslexia are driven by temporal processing difficulties.

    Maaike Vandermosten;Bart Boets;Heleen Luts;Hanne Poelmans

  • Coherent Motion Sensitivity and Reading Development in the Transition From Prereading to Reading Stage

    Bart Boets;Maaike Vandermosten;Piers Cornelissen;Jan Wouters

  • Speech perception in preschoolers at family risk for dyslexia: relations with low-level auditory processing and phonological ability.

    Bart Boets;Pol Ghesquière;Astrid van Wieringen;Jan Wouters

  • Is There a Common Neuroanatomical Substrate of Language Deficit between Autism Spectrum Disorder and Specific Language Impairment

    Judith S. Verhoeven;Nathalie Rommel;Elena Prodi;Alexander Leemans

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Steyaert
Jean Steyaert KU Leuven
Jan Wouters
Jan Wouters KU Leuven
Ilse Noens
Ilse Noens KU Leuven
Hans Op de Beeck
Hans Op de Beeck Allen Institute for Brain Science
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Bert De Smedt
Bert De Smedt KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens a range of online degree and career options. Many students consider becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a field with specific educational and licensure requirements depending on your location. Before starting, it’s important to understand mft requirements in Columbus, which highlight the need for a graduate degree, supervised experience, and successful completion of national exams.

Different cities and states have unique criteria. For instance, you can review Corpus Christi mft education requirements as well as Dallas mft education requirements to compare course content, clinical hour prerequisites, and application processes. In Denver, details about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Denver help you understand Colorado’s licensing steps.

Taking your psychology studies online enables flexibility and access to diverse program specializations. Researching requirements by location ensures you’re prepared for your preferred pathway, no matter where you plan to start your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Bart Boets

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles