World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4807 4453 2656 2404 150 11134
Neuroscience 53 5075 4663 2273 2053 150 11139

Fumiko Hoeft publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fumiko Hoeft between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fumiko Hoeft published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 25 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
2006 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fumiko Hoeft: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 4
2007 8
2008 9
2009 13
2010 7
2011 9
2012 8
2013 9
2014 15
2015 3
2016 13
2017 7
2018 7
2019 7
2020 8
2021 18
2022 14
2023 11
2024 11
2025 14
Total 195
Download as CSV

Fumiko Hoeft publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fumiko Hoeft sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fumiko Hoeft D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fumiko Hoeft sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fumiko Hoeft is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States and is active in research primarily within the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Clinical Psychology.

The areas of research explored by Hoeft prominently include Reading and Literacy Development, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills.

Frequent publication venues for Hoeft's research include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors with whom Hoeft has collaborated include:

  • Roeland Hancock
  • Florence Bouhali
  • Stephanie L. Haft
  • Jocelyn Caballero
  • Kenneth R. Pugh

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Hoeft are:

  • "Contribution of sustained attention abilities to real-world academic skills in children," 2023, Scientific Reports
  • "A Systematic Review of the Consequences of Stigma and Stereotype Threat for Individuals With Specific Learning Disabilities," 2022, Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • "Enhanced visceromotor emotional reactivity in dyslexia and its relation to salience network connectivity," 2020, Cortex
  • "Language combinations of multilinguals are reflected in their first-language knowledge and processing," 2023, Scientific Reports
  • "Development of an Abbreviated Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ-Brief) Using a Machine Learning Approach," 2021, Journal of Learning Disabilities

Hoeft has contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a title published by Cambridge University Press: "The Cambridge Handbook of Dyslexia and Dyscalculia," released in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Failure of Anterior Cingulate Activation and Connectivity With the Amygdala During Implicit Regulation of Emotional Processing in Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Amit Etkin;Katherine E. Prater;Fumiko Hoeft;Vinod Menon

  • Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia

    Fumiko Hoeft;Bruce D. McCandliss;Jessica M. Black;Alexander Gantman

  • Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability.

    Fumiko Hoeft;Ann Meyler;Arvel Hernandez;Connie Juel

  • Methods and Software for fMRI Analysis of Clinical Subjects

    P.K. Mazaika;F. Hoeft;G.H. Glover;A.L. Reiss

  • Resting-State Functional Connectivity of Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Depressed Adolescents

    Colm G. Connolly;Jing Wu;Tiffany C. Ho;Fumiko Hoeft

  • GAT: A Graph-Theoretical Analysis Toolbox for Analyzing Between-Group Differences in Large-Scale Structural and Functional Brain Networks

    S. M. Hadi Hosseini;Fumiko Hoeft;Fumiko Hoeft;Shelli R. Kesler

  • Gender differences in the mesocorticolimbic system during computer game-play

    Fumiko Hoeft;Christa L. Watson;Shelli R. Kesler;Keith E. Bettinger

  • More Is Not Always Better: Increased Fractional Anisotropy of Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus Associated with Poor Visuospatial Abilities in Williams Syndrome

    Fumiko Hoeft;Naama Barnea-Goraly;Brian W. Haas;Golijeh Golarai

  • Neural Basis of Dyslexia: A Comparison between Dyslexic and Nondyslexic Children Equated for Reading Ability

    Fumiko Hoeft;Arvel Hernandez;Glenn McMillon;Heather Taylor-Hill

  • Universal brain signature of proficient reading: Evidence from four contrasting languages

    Jay G. Rueckl;Jay G. Rueckl;Pedro M. Paz-Alonso;Peter J. Molfese;Peter J. Molfese;Wen Jui Kuo

  • The Brain Basis of the Phonological Deficit in Dyslexia Is Independent of IQ

    Hiroko Tanaka;Hiroko Tanaka;Jessica M. Black;Jessica M. Black;Charles Hulme;Leanne M. Stanley;Leanne M. Stanley

  • Functional Brain Basis of Hypnotizability

    Fumiko Hoeft;John D. E. Gabrieli;Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli;Brian W. Haas

  • Neuroanatomy of Fragile X Syndrome Is Associated with Aberrant Behavior and the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP)

    Doron Gothelf;Joyce A. Furfaro;Fumiko Hoeft;Mark A. Eckert

  • Neurobiological Underpinnings of Math and Reading Learning Disabilities

    Sarit Ashkenazi;Jessica M. Black;Daniel A. Abrams;Fumiko Hoeft

  • Prediction of children's reading skills using behavioral, functional, and structural neuroimaging measures.

    Fumiko Hoeft;Takefumi Ueno;Allan L. Reiss;Ann Meyler

  • Recognizing Psychiatric Comorbidity With Reading Disorders.

    Robert L. Hendren;Stephanie L. Haft;Jessica M. Black;Nancy Cushen White

  • Neural Noise Hypothesis of Developmental Dyslexia

    Roeland Hancock;Kenneth R. Pugh;Fumiko Hoeft

  • Socio-Emotional and Cognitive Resilience in Children with Reading Disabilities.

    Stephanie L Haft;Chelsea A Myers;Fumiko Hoeft

  • Genetic influences on sociability: heightened amygdala reactivity and event-related responses to positive social stimuli in Williams syndrome.

    Brian W. Haas;Debra Mills;Anna Yam;Fumiko Hoeft

  • Functional neuroanatomical evidence for the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia

    Elizabeth S. Norton;Jessica M. Black;Leanne M. Stanley;Hiroko Tanaka

  • Brain Activation during Sentence Comprehension among Good and Poor Readers

    Ann Meyler;Timothy A. Keller;Vladimir L. Cherkassky;Donghoon Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University
Brian W. Haas
Brian W. Haas University of Georgia
Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
Nicole Landi
Nicole Landi University of Connecticut
Ursula Bellugi
Ursula Bellugi Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli Northeastern University
Robert K. Fulbright
Robert K. Fulbright Yale University
Masaru Mimura
Masaru Mimura Keio University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and career routes, particularly in Social Work. Many students with a background in Psychology pursue Social Work programs to gain specialized skills in counseling, advocacy, and community engagement. Online education has made these opportunities more accessible and flexible than ever before.

If you are interested in pursuing Social Work after your Psychology studies, it’s essential to choose a program offering the best return on investment. For instance, the most valuable online social work degree programs in Kansas and the best value online social work programs in Maryland provide affordable, accredited options that are highly respected by employers.

For those located centrally, the best value online social work degrees in the Midwest can offer flexible learning paths with strong practical components. Similarly, students on the West Coast may explore the best value online social work programs in Nevada for regionally relevant opportunities.

Carefully researching online degree programs ensures you’re investing in an education that supports your long-term career goals in psychology and related helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Fumiko Hoeft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles