World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6400 5956 3471 3151 115 9097

Tiffany C. Ho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tiffany C. Ho between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tiffany C. Ho published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 32 of the 186 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 18 publications
2006 2025

186 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tiffany C. Ho: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 2
2010 0
2011 2
2012 5
2013 2
2014 4
2015 4
2016 8
2017 10
2018 9
2019 16
2020 14
2021 35
2022 23
2023 19
2024 14
2025 18
Total 186
Download as CSV

Tiffany C. Ho publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiffany C. Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tiffany C. Ho D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiffany C. Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tiffany C. Ho is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research intersects multiple disciplines, primarily within Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience.

Their work engages deeply with Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and also extends into Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Behavioral Neuroscience. Key topics explored include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Mental Health Research Topics, Tryptophan and brain disorders, and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies.

Tiffany C. Ho has contributed to a range of publications with a focus on neuroimaging and mental health. Notable recent papers include:

  • Subcortical shape alterations in major depressive disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Longitudinal Change in Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Symptoms from before to during the COVID -19 Pandemic, 2022, Journal of Research on Adolescence

Collaborations with frequent co-authors include the following individuals:

  • Ian H. Gotlib
  • Giana I. Teresi
  • Colm G. Connolly
  • Tony T. Yang
  • Paul M. Thompson

Tiffany C. Ho's research outputs have appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder : findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    Tiffany C. Ho;Boris Gutman;Elena Pozzi;Hans J. Grabe

  • Resting-State Functional Connectivity of Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Depressed Adolescents

    Colm G. Connolly;Jing Wu;Tiffany C. Ho;Fumiko Hoeft

  • White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Laura S. van Velzen;Sinead Kelly;Sinead Kelly;Dmitry Isaev;Andre Aleman

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex.

    Tiffany C. Ho;Scott Brown;John T. Serences

  • Emotion-Dependent Functional Connectivity of the Default Mode Network in Adolescent Depression

    Tiffany C. Ho;Colm G. Connolly;Eva Henje Blom;Eva Henje Blom;Kaja Z. LeWinn

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Neural Correlates of Trial-to-Trial Fluctuations in Response Caution

    L. van Maanen;S.D. Brown;T. Eichele;E.-J. Wagenmakers

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • Resting-state functional connectivity of the amygdala and longitudinal changes in depression severity in adolescent depression

    Colm G. Connolly;Tiffany C. Ho;Tiffany C. Ho;Eva Henje Blom;Eva Henje Blom;Kaja Z. LeWinn

  • Functional connectivity of negative emotional processing in adolescent depression.

    Tiffany C. Ho;Guang Yang;Jing Wu;Pete Cassey

  • Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions.

    John T. Serences;Sameer Saproo;Miranda Scolari;Tiffany Ho

  • Visual outcomes for high myopic patients with or without myopic maculopathy: a 10 year follow up study

    Y. F. Shih;T. C. Ho;C. K. Hsiao;L. L. K. Lin

  • White matter correlates of adolescent depression: structural evidence for frontolimbic disconnectivity.

    Kaja Z. LeWinn;Colm G. Connolly;Jing Wu;Miroslav Drahos

  • Network basis of suicidal ideation in depressed adolescents.

    Sarah J. Ordaz;Meghan S. Goyer;Tiffany C. Ho;Manpreet K. Singh

  • The Optimality of Sensory Processing during the Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff

    T. Ho;S. Brown;L. van Maanen;B.U. Forstmann

  • Altered Cerebral Perfusion in Executive, Affective, and Motor Networks During Adolescent Depression

    Tiffany C. Ho;Jing Wu;David D. Shin;Thomas T. Liu

  • Evidence for a sensitive period in the effects of early life stress on hippocampal volume.

    Kathryn L. Humphreys;Lucy S. King;Matthew D. Sacchet;M. Catalina Camacho

  • Large-Scale Hypoconnectivity Between Resting-State Functional Networks in Unmedicated Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder.

    Matthew D. Sacchet;Matthew D. Sacchet;Tiffany C. Ho;Colm G. Connolly;Olga Tymofiyeva

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University
Matthew D. Sacchet
Matthew D. Sacchet Harvard University
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Alan N. Simmons
Alan N. Simmons University of California, San Diego
Thomas Frodl
Thomas Frodl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Neda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad University of Southern California
Udo Dannlowski
Udo Dannlowski University of Münster
Lianne Schmaal
Lianne Schmaal University of Melbourne
Axel Krug
Axel Krug Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your psychology education in the USA can open doors to a diverse range of careers in counseling, education, research, and clinical practice. Today’s students have flexible options, including both on-campus and online programs.

For those interested in academic research or clinical leadership, the best phd programs for psychology offer rigorous preparation for high-level roles in universities, hospitals, and private practice. If your passion lies in the intersection of psychology and law, pursuing a doctorate in forensic psychology online can lead to specialized careers within criminal justice or legal consulting.

Aspiring school psychologists should consider programs recognized for excellence, such as nasp accredited school psychology programs, which are designed to meet national certification standards. If you are seeking a faster path to advancement, you might explore a 1-year masters in psychology online. This option is ideal for career changers or those wanting to quickly gain advanced skills.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees provide flexibility without sacrificing academic quality, setting you up for meaningful and rewarding opportunities in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Tiffany C. Ho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles