World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 54 4932 4535 2212 1999 122 10089
Social Sciences and Humanities 54 2183 1987 1050 944 122 10063

Nadine Gaab publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nadine Gaab between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nadine Gaab published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 19 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 4 publications
2001 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nadine Gaab: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 5
2007 3
2008 1
2009 4
2010 6
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 6
2015 5
2016 9
2017 2
2018 7
2019 7
2020 14
2021 20
2022 16
2023 12
2024 15
2025 4
Total 159
Download as CSV

Nadine Gaab publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Gaab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 122 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 122
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Nadine Gaab D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Gaab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131 54
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Nadine Gaab is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology, neuroscience, and medicine. Key subfields include developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, statistics, probability, and education.

Their work addresses several core topics such as reading and literacy development, language development and disorders, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, birth, development, health, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Below are some of the recent papers associated with their research involvement:

  • Reintroducing Dyslexia: Early Identification and Implications for Pediatric Practice (2020), published in PEDIATRICS
  • Sex Differences in Functional Connectivity of the Salience, Default Mode, and Central Executive Networks in Youth with ASD (2020), published in Cerebral Cortex
  • Translational Science: A Road Map for the Science of Reading (2020), published in Reading Research Quarterly
  • White Matter in Infancy Is Prospectively Associated with Language Outcomes in Kindergarten (2021), published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • A Global Multicohort Study to Map Subcortical Brain Development and Cognition in Infancy and Early Childhood (2023), published in Nature Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Ted K. Turesky
  • Xi Yu
  • Charles A. Nelson
  • Jennifer Zuk
  • Jade Dunstan

Their publications appear often in specific venues, reflecting a focused dissemination of their work. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 11 publications
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience with 5 publications
  • Cerebral Cortex with 3 publications
  • Biological Psychiatry with 2 publications
  • Developmental Science with 2 publications

The research topics covered reveal an interdisciplinary approach emphasizing developmental processes related to reading, language, brain, and cognitive functions, as well as clinical applications in pediatrics and developmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and language development

    Paula Tallal;Nadine Gaab

  • Cerebellar Volume of Musicians

    Siobhan Hutchinson;Leslie Hui-Lin Lee;Nadine Gaab;Gottfried Schlaug

  • Sleep-dependent motor memory plasticity in the human brain

    M.P. Walker;R. Stickgold;D. Alsop;N. Gaab

  • Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Executive Functioning in Musicians and Non-Musicians

    Jennifer Zuk;Christopher Benjamin;Arnold Kenyon;Nadine Gaab

  • Connectivity precedes function in the development of the visual word form area

    Zeynep M Saygin;David E Osher;Elizabeth S Norton;Deanna A Youssoufian

  • Functional anatomy of pitch memory--an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling.

    Nadine Gaab;Christian Gaser;Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke

  • Neural correlates of rapid auditory processing are disrupted in children with developmental dyslexia and ameliorated with training: an fMRI study.

    N Gaab;J D E Gabrieli;G K Deutsch;P Tallal

  • Structural brain alterations associated with dyslexia predate reading onset

    Nora Maria Raschle;Maria Chang;Nadine Gaab

  • Evaluating the validity of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration for developmental cognitive neuroscience studies in children 4 to 11 years of age

    Satrajit S Ghosh;Sita Kakunoori;Jean C. Augustinack;Alfonso Nieto-Castanon

  • Functional characteristics of developmental dyslexia in left-hemispheric posterior brain regions predate reading onset.

    Nora Maria Raschle;Jennifer Zuk;Nadine Gaab

  • Tracking the Roots of Reading Ability: White Matter Volume and Integrity Correlate with Phonological Awareness in Prereading and Early-Reading Kindergarten Children

    Zeynep M. Saygin;Elizabeth S. Norton;David E. Osher;Sara D. Beach

  • Pediatric neuroimaging in early childhood and infancy: Challenges and practical guidelines

    Nora Raschle;Nora Raschle;Jennifer Margaret Zuk;Silvia Ortiz-Mantilla;Danielle D. Sliva

  • Short-term functional plasticity in the human auditory cortex: an fMRI study.

    L Jäncke;N Gaab;T Wüstenberg;H Scheich

  • Brain Basis of Phonological Awareness for Spoken Language in Children and Its Disruption in Dyslexia

    Ioulia Kovelman;Elizabeth S. Norton;Elizabeth S. Norton;Joanna A. Christodoulou;Nadine Gaab

  • Tackling the 'dyslexia paradox': reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia.

    Ola Ozernov-Palchik;Ola Ozernov-Palchik;Nadine Gaab;Nadine Gaab

  • Development of Tract-Specific White Matter Pathways During Early Reading Development in At-Risk Children and Typical Controls

    Yingying Wang;Yingying Wang;Yingying Wang;Meaghan V. Mauer;Talia Raney;Barbara Peysakhovich

  • Dissociable networks for the expectancy and perception of emotional stimuli in the human brain

    Felix Bermpohl;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Amir Amedi;Lotfi B. Merabet

  • Improvement-related functional plasticity following pitch memory training

    Nadine Gaab;Christian Gaser;Gottfried Schlaug

  • The effect of musicianship on pitch memory in performance matched groups.

    Nadine Gaab;Gottfried Schlaug

  • Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

    Nadine Gaab;John D.E. Gabrieli;Gary H. Glover

  • Connectivity precedes function in the development of the visual word form area

    Nancy Kanwisher;David Osher;Elizabeth Norton;Deanna Youssoufian

Frequent Co-Authors

Gottfried Schlaug
Gottfried Schlaug University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital
P. Ellen Grant
P. Ellen Grant Boston Children's Hospital
Bruce Fischl
Bruce Fischl Harvard University
Sara Jane Webb
Sara Jane Webb Seattle Children's Hospital
Paula Tallal
Paula Tallal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Raphael Bernier
Raphael Bernier University of Washington
Daniel H. Geschwind
Daniel H. Geschwind University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide range of online degrees with flexible career pathways. For those eager to advance quickly, you can earn your degree in less time by choosing 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees. These programs allow motivated students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

Graduate-level options include earning a masters degree online, with many universities offering intensive, flexible programs that can be completed in as little as one year. For aspiring social workers, it's possible to make your dream more affordable by focusing on the cheapest online msw programs, which offer quality education without the high price tag.

Students interested in behavioral analysis and therapy careers should consider bcba certification programs online. These programs are designed to provide comprehensive training and credentials at a lower cost, helping you meet industry standards and prepare for licensure.

Whether you want to accelerate your studies or keep costs in check, these flexible online pathways make it easier than ever to succeed in the Social Sciences and Humanities field.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Gaab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles