World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
86
Citations
33212
World Ranking
1122
National Ranking
695

Neuroscience

D-Index
85
Citations
33005
World Ranking
1317
National Ranking
668

Paula Tallal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula Tallal sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paula Tallal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula Tallal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paula Tallal is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Psychology, Neuroscience, and Social Sciences, with a particular emphasis on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Education.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the paper titled Providing Instruction Based on Students' Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning, published in 2020 in the journal Frontiers in Psychology. This paper has drawn citations reflecting engagement with the research community.

Frequent topics in Paula Tallal's work cover areas such as:

  • Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Innovative Teaching Methods

Collaboration has been an aspect of their academic output, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Beth A. Rogowsky
  • Barbara M. Calhoun
  • Diane Lillo-Martin

Their research is often published in venues like Frontiers in Psychology, presenting findings relevant to both academic peers and practical applications in education and neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children ☆

    Paula Tallal;Paula Tallal

  • LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION IN LANGUAGE-LEARNING IMPAIRED CHILDREN IMPROVED WITH ACOUSTICALLY MODIFIED SPEECH

    P. Tallal;S. L. Miller;G. Bedi;G. Byma

  • Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training

    Michael M. Merzenich;William M. Jenkins;Paul Johnston;Christoph Schreiner

  • Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing

    Paula Tallal;Steve Miller;Roslyn Holly Fitch

  • Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI

    Elise Temple;Gayle K. Deutsch;Russell A. Poldrack;Steven L. Miller

  • Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia.

    Paula Tallal;M. Piercy

  • Selection of children with specific language deficits.

    Rachel E. Stark;Paula Tallal

  • Developmental aphasia: Rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception

    Paula Tallal;Malcolm Piercy

  • Developmental aphasia: impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality.

    Paula Tallal;Malcolm Piercy

  • Improving language and literacy is a matter of time

    Paula Tallal

  • Developmental aphasia: The perception of brief vowels and extended stop consonants

    Paula Tallal;Malcolm Piercy

  • Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment

    April A Benasich;Paula Tallal

  • MATURATION OF HUMAN CEREBRUM OBSERVED IN VIVO DURING ADOLESCENCE

    Terry L. Jernigan;Doris A. Trauner;John R. Hesselink;Paula A. Tallal

  • Disrupted neural responses to phonological and orthographic processing in dyslexic children: an fMRI study.

    Elise Temple;Russell A. Poldrack;Joanna Salidis;Gayle K. Deutsch

  • Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and language development

    Paula Tallal;Nadine Gaab

  • Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers

    Srikantan Nagarajan;Henry Mahncke;Talya Salz;Paula Tallal

  • Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: evidence from a twin study.

    D. V. M. Bishop;Sonia J. Bishop;Peter Bright;Cheryl James

  • Identification of language-impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills

    Paula Tallal;Paula Tallal;Rachel E Stark;E.David Mellits

  • The neurobiology of sensory and language processing in language-impaired children

    Helen J. Neville;Sharon A. Coffey;Phillip J. Holcomb;Paula Tallal

  • Cerebral structure on magnetic resonance imaging in language- and learning-impaired children.

    Terry L. Jernigan;John R. Hesselink;Elizabeth Sowell;Paula A. Tallal

  • Fundamentals of human neuropsychology: by Bryan Kolb and Ian Q. Whishaw, W. H. Freeman, 1980. £8.95 (x + 501 pages) ISBN 0 7167 1279 9 (board)

    Paula Tallal

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael M. Merzenich
Michael M. Merzenich University of California, San Francisco
Linda M. Brzustowicz
Linda M. Brzustowicz Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Nadine Gaab
Nadine Gaab Harvard University
Srikantan S. Nagarajan
Srikantan S. Nagarajan University of California, San Francisco
Glenn D. Rosen
Glenn D. Rosen Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Doris A. Trauner
Doris A. Trauner University of California, San Diego
April A. Benasich
April A. Benasich Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Anne S. Bassett
Anne S. Bassett University of Toronto
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology can open the door to a variety of rewarding careers. One of the most in-demand specializations is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). BCBAs work with individuals to improve behavioral outcomes and are especially vital in schools, hospitals, and community agencies.

To pursue this path, it’s important to understand location-specific requirements. For example, the Nashville bcba requirements highlight state licensure and supervised fieldwork. If you’re considering working in Louisiana, you’ll need to follow the specific process for becoming a bcba in New Orleans.

Similarly, practicing in New York demands compliance with the New York City bcba requirements, while those interested in New Jersey should be aware of bcba certification requirements in Newark.

No matter your location, obtaining a psychology-focused degree online offers flexibility and access to the education needed for these fulfilling career paths, each tailored to state guidelines.

Best Scientists Citing Paula Tallal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles