What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Neuroscience
- Cognition
- Perception
Trent Nicol spends much of his time researching Audiology, Perception, Frequency following response, Stimulus and Speech perception.
His studies deal with areas such as Syllable, Communication and Neurocomputational speech processing as well as Audiology.
His work deals with themes such as Neurophysiology, Cognition, Learning disability and Auditory cortex, which intersect with Perception.
His Frequency following response study combines topics in areas such as Cognitive psychology and Auditory perception.
His Stimulus study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Brainstem.
Trent Nicol focuses mostly in the field of Speech perception, narrowing it down to matters related to Sensory system and, in some cases, Auditory neuropathy, Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and Cochlear nerve.
His most cited work include:
- Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems (465 citations)
- Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. (270 citations)
- Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training (265 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Audiology, Speech perception, Stimulus, Neuroscience and Perception.
The concepts of his Audiology study are interwoven with issues in Communication, Mismatch negativity, Formant and Brainstem.
His Speech perception research integrates issues from Background noise, Phonetics, Auditory perception and Auditory cortex.
He combines subjects such as Developmental psychology, Valence, Arousal and Habituation with his study of Stimulus.
In the field of Neuroscience, his study on Electrophysiology, Medial geniculate body, Frequency following response and Thalamus overlaps with subjects such as Temporal lobe.
In his study, Cognitive psychology is inextricably linked to Dyslexia, which falls within the broad field of Perception.
He most often published in these fields:
- Audiology (57.94%)
- Speech perception (30.84%)
- Stimulus (25.23%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Audiology (57.94%)
- Frequency following response (13.08%)
- Neuroscience (24.30%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Audiology, Frequency following response, Neuroscience, Rhythm and Concussion are his primary areas of study.
His Audiology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Typically developing and Set.
His Set research includes elements of Neurophysiology, Central nervous system and Formant.
His Frequency following response study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Inferior colliculus, Neuroplasticity, Auditory Physiology and Encoding.
His study in the field of Electrophysiology and Brainstem is also linked to topics like Perspective.
His studies in Rhythm integrate themes in fields like Cognitive psychology, Beat and School age child.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. (34 citations)
- Case studies in neuroscience: subcortical origins of the frequency-following response. (16 citations)
- Difficulty hearing in noise: a sequela of concussion in children. (14 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Neuroscience
- Cognition
- Perception
Trent Nicol mainly investigates Neuroscience, Frequency following response, Audiology, Auditory Physiology and Encoding.
His work on Electrophysiology and Neural activity as part of general Neuroscience study is frequently linked to DUAL, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
Trent Nicol is involved in the study of Audiology that focuses on Hearing loss in particular.
His Auditory Physiology research encompasses a variety of disciplines, including Perspective and Fidelity.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
