World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
14193
World Ranking
3974
National Ranking
1808

Trent Nicol publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trent Nicol sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Trent Nicol D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trent Nicol sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Trent Nicol is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems, Epidemiology, and Neurology.

Their work encompasses a range of topics including Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Language Development and Disorders, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, and Vestibular and auditory disorders.

Frequent publication venues for Trent Nicol include Scientific Reports, AIDS, Clinical Neurophysiology, The Hearing Journal, and npj Science of Learning.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Trent Nicol are:

  • Sex differences in auditory processing vary across estrous cycle (2021) published in Scientific Reports
  • Rhythm, reading, and sound processing in the brain in preschool children (2021) published in npj Science of Learning
  • Auditory neurophysiology reveals central nervous system dysfunction in HIV-infected individuals (2020) published in Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Distinct rhythmic abilities align with phonological awareness and rapid naming in school-age children (2020) published in Cognitive Processing
  • Auditory Processing Differences in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder (2020) published in Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Trent Nicol has collaborated frequently with several co-authors. These include:

  • Nina Kraus
  • Jennifer Krizman
  • Silvia Bonacina
  • Travis White-Schwoch
  • Albert Magohe

Best Publications

  • Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

    Erika Skoe;Nina Kraus

  • Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems

    Nina Kraus;Therese J. McGee;Thomas D. Carrell;Steven G. Zecker

  • Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.

    Anu Sharma;Nina Kraus;Therese J. McGee;Trent G Nicol

  • Brainstem responses to speech syllables

    Nicole Russo;Trent Nicol;Gabriella Musacchia;Nina Kraus

  • Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training

    Nina Kraus;Therese McGee;Thomas D. Carrell;Cynthia King

  • Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem

    Nicole M. Russo;Trent G. Nicol;Steven G. Zecker;Erin A. Hayes

  • Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement

    Jenna Cunningham;Trent Nicol;Steven G Zecker;Ann R Bradlow

  • Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing.

    Krista L. Johnson;Trent G. Nicol;Nina Kraus

  • Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function

    Karen Banai;Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol

  • Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems.

    Erin A Hayes;Catherine M Warrier;Trent G Nicol;Steven G Zecker

  • Right-Hemisphere Auditory Cortex Is Dominant for Coding Syllable Patterns in Speech

    Daniel A. Abrams;Trent Nicol;Steven Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Context-Dependent Encoding in the Human Auditory Brainstem Relates to Hearing Speech in Noise: Implications for Developmental Dyslexia

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol

  • Brainstem origins for cortical ‘what’ and ‘where’ pathways in the auditory system

    Nina Kraus;Trent Nicol

  • Music enrichment programs improve the neural encoding of speech in at-risk children

    Nina Kraus;Jessica Slater;Elaine C. Thompson;Jane Hornickel

  • Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception

    Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol;Steven Zecker

  • Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy.

    N. Kraus;A.R. Bradlow;M.A. Cheatham;J. Cunningham

  • Deficient Brainstem Encoding of Pitch in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    N.M. Russo;E. Skoe;B. Trommer;T. Nicol

  • Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems.

    Brad Wible;Trent Nicol;Nina Kraus

  • Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy.

    Karen Banai;Trent Nicol;Steven G Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change.

    Nina Kraus;T. McGee;T. Littman;T. Nicol

Frequent Co-Authors

Nina Kraus
Nina Kraus Northwestern University
Steven G. Zecker
Steven G. Zecker Northwestern University
Erika Skoe
Erika Skoe University of Connecticut
Anu Sharma
Anu Sharma University of Colorado Boulder
Ann R. Bradlow
Ann R. Bradlow Northwestern University
Mikko Sams
Mikko Sams Aalto University
Robert J. Zatorre
Robert J. Zatorre McGill University
Samira Anderson
Samira Anderson University of Maryland, College Park
Bharath Chandrasekaran
Bharath Chandrasekaran University of Pittsburgh
Molly Losh
Molly Losh Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Trent Nicol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles