World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Finland
2026
Award Badge
Psychology
Finland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 877 766 4 3 238 33443
Neuroscience 92 1018 911 5 5 246 33464

Kimmo Alho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kimmo Alho between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kimmo Alho published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1997. 7 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1997. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kimmo Alho: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 2
1985 5
1986 2
1987 8
1988 2
1989 6
1990 5
1991 3
1992 7
1993 11
1994 5
1995 12
1996 9
1997 20
1998 12
1999 10
2000 10
2001 10
2002 5
2003 10
2004 7
2005 4
2006 4
2007 9
2008 3
2009 7
2010 4
2011 1
2012 3
2013 4
2014 3
2015 7
2016 6
2017 7
2018 7
2019 6
2020 5
2021 5
2022 6
2023 11
2024 6
2025 1
Total 272
Download as CSV

Kimmo Alho publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimmo Alho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 238 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 238
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kimmo Alho D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimmo Alho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Finland Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Finland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Finland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Finland Leader Award
  • 2006 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Kimmo Alho is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland and works primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their research focuses on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, with additional interests in Education, Psychiatry and Mental health, as well as Sociology and Political Science.

Their main topics of research include:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Among the frequent co-authors collaborating with Kimmo Alho are:

  • Patrik Wikman (13 co-authored works)
  • Viljami Salmela (9 co-authored works)
  • Katariina Salmela-Aro (7 co-authored works)
  • Matti Laine (6 co-authored works)
  • Artturi Ylinen (6 co-authored works)

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 5 publications
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience with 2 publications
  • Cerebral Cortex with 2 publications
  • European Journal of Neuroscience with 2 publications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 2 publications

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Kimmo Alho include:

  • Effects of Media Multitasking and Video Gaming on Cognitive Functions and Their Neural Bases in Adolescents and Young Adults, 2022, published in European Psychologist
  • Social Media Use and Depressive Symptoms-A Longitudinal Study from Early to Late Adolescence, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Are Schools Alienating Digitally Engaged Students? Longitudinal Relations between Digital Engagement and School Engagement, 2020, Frontline Learning Research
  • Modulation of Brain Activity by Selective Attention to Audiovisual Dialogues, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Working memory training restores aberrant brain activity in adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Kimmo Alho was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2006.

Best Publications

  • The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.

    R. Näätänen;R. Näätänen;P. Paavilainen;T. Rinne;K. Alho

  • Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses

    Risto Näätänen;Anne Lehtokoski;Mietta Lennes;Marie Cheour

  • Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change

    Carles Escera;Kimmo Alho;István Winkler;Risto Näätänen

  • Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials

    M Sams;P Paavilainen;Kimmo Alho;R Naatanen

  • Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes.

    Kimmo Alho

  • Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans

    H. T. Tiitinen;J. Sinkkonen;K. Reinikainen;K. Alho

  • Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials.

    Carles Escera;Kimmo Alho;Erich Schröger;István Winkler Winkler

  • Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain.

    Marie Cheour;Rita Ceponiene;Anne Lehtokoski;Aavo Luuk

  • Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources.

    T. Rinne;K. Alho;R.J. Ilmoniemi;J. Virtanen;J. Virtanen

  • Attention and mismatch negativity

    R Näätänen;P Paavilainen;H Tiitinen;D Jiang

  • Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man.

    Riitta Hari;Matti Hämäläinen;R. Ilmoniemi;E. Kaukoranta

  • Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.

    Kimmo Alho;David L. Woods;Alain Algazi;Risto Näätänen

  • Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?

    Risto Näätänen;Petri Paavilainen;Kimmo Alho;Kalevi Reinikainen

  • Mismatch negativity--a unique measure of sensory processing in audition.

    Risto Näätänen;Kimmo Alho

  • Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities

    Petri Paavilainen;Kimmo Alho;Kalevi Reinikainen;Mikko Sams

  • Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity.

    K. Alho;David L Woods;A. Algazi;R. T. Knight

  • Attentional modulation of human auditory cortex.

    Christopher I Petkov;Xiaojian Kang;Kimmo Alho;Olivier Bertrand

  • Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magnetoencephalographic recordings

    Kimmo Alho;István Winkler;István Winkler;Carles Escera;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen

  • Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus☆

    Kimmo Alho;K Sainio;Nina Kristiina Sajaniemi;K Reinikainen

  • Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Teija Kujala;Yury Shtyrov;Jaana Simola

Frequent Co-Authors

Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
K. Reinikainen
K. Reinikainen University of Helsinki
Mikko Sams
Mikko Sams Aalto University
Teemu Rinne
Teemu Rinne University of Helsinki
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Petri Paavilainen
Petri Paavilainen University of Helsinki
Teija Kujala
Teija Kujala University of Helsinki
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Carles Escera
Carles Escera University of Barcelona
Minna Huotilainen
Minna Huotilainen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of social sciences courses, which can broaden your perspective and boost your career options. Degrees in psychology, counseling, and related fields can lead to rewarding careers in mental health, education, or research.

When deciding between sociology and psychology, students often wonder what pays more psychology or sociology. Earning potential can vary based on location, education level, and specialization. Generally, both fields offer solid career prospects with room for growth, especially for those who pursue advanced degrees or certifications.

Students interested in counseling should explore high-quality programs for a competitive advantage. If you’re looking in Maryland, check out the best counseling degree programs in Baltimore. For those in Massachusetts, the best college counseling programs in Boston are excellent options that can prepare you for licensure and real-world practice.

Online programs make it easier than ever to earn your degree and start your chosen career path in psychology, sociology, or counseling from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Kimmo Alho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles