World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Finland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 81 1397 1246 12 10 262 22842

Mari Tervaniemi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mari Tervaniemi between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mari Tervaniemi published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2018. 14 of the 301 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2018. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
1992 2025

301 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mari Tervaniemi: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 4
1996 4
1997 10
1998 8
1999 10
2000 7
2001 12
2002 2
2003 14
2004 9
2005 8
2006 12
2007 13
2008 5
2009 17
2010 8
2011 12
2012 13
2013 13
2014 6
2015 10
2016 13
2017 7
2018 18
2019 9
2020 5
2021 8
2022 16
2023 9
2024 4
2025 10
Total 301
Download as CSV

Mari Tervaniemi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Tervaniemi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 262 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 262
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mari Tervaniemi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Tervaniemi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 81
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award

Overview

Mari Tervaniemi is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their research spans multiple disciplines within neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and music's role in brain function and rehabilitation.

The main fields of study covered by their research include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these fields, the subfields of focus are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Music
  • Molecular Biology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

The key topics addressed in their work consist of:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Music Therapy and Health
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Vocal music enhances memory and language recovery after stroke: pooled results from two RCTs" (2020), published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "Inter-brain synchronization occurs without physical co-presence during cooperative online gaming" (2022), published in Neuropsychologia
  • "Transient DUX4 expression in human embryonic stem cells induces blastomere-like expression program that is marked by SLC34A2" (2022), published in Stem Cell Reports
  • "The neuroscience of music - towards ecological validity" (2023), published in Trends in Neurosciences
  • "Improved Auditory Function Caused by Music Versus Foreign Language Training at School Age: Is There a Difference?" (2021), published in Cerebral Cortex

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mari Tervaniemi include:

  • Vesa Putkinen
  • Tommi Makkonen
  • Peixin Nie
  • Cuicui Wang
  • Sha Tao

Their work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • Neuropsychologia
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal

Best Publications

  • Music listening enhances cognitive recovery and mood after middle cerebral artery stroke

    Teppo Särkämö;Mari Tervaniemi;Sari Laitinen;Anita Forsblom

  • ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex

    Risto Näätänen;Mari Tervaniemi;Elyse Sussman;Petri Paavilainen

  • Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Benefits of Regular Musical Activities in Early Dementia: Randomized Controlled Study

    Teppo Särkämö;Mari Tervaniemi;Sari Laitinen;Ava Numminen

  • The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations.

    Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Erich Schröger

  • Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions

    Mari Tervaniemi;Kenneth Hugdahl

  • Individual music therapy for depression: randomised controlled trial

    Jaakko Erkkilä;Marko Punkanen;Jörg Fachner;Esa Ala-Ruona

  • Superior Pre-Attentive Auditory Processing in Musicians

    Stefan Koelsch;Erich Schröger;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation

    Aleksi J Sihvonen;Aleksi J Sihvonen;Teppo Särkämö;Vera Leo;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain

    Risto Näätänen;Erich Schröger;Sirel Karakas;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

    Mari Tervaniemi;Mari Tervaniemi;Viola Just;Stefan Koelsch;Andreas Widmann

  • Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children

    T. Kujala;K. Karma;R. Ceponiene;S. Belitz

  • Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission.

    Hirooki Yabe;Mari Tervaniemi;Kalevi Reinikainen;Risto Näätänen

  • Superior Formation of Cortical Memory Traces for Melodic Patterns in Musicians

    Mari Tervaniemi;Mika Rytkönen;Erich Schröger;Risto J. Ilmoniemi

  • A functional MRI study of happy and sad emotions in music with and without lyrics

    Elvira Brattico;Elvira Brattico;Vinoo Alluri;Brigitte Bogert;Brigitte Bogert;Thomas Jacobsen

  • Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain.

    Jukka Saarinen;Petri Paavilainen;Erich Schöger;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Lateralized automatic auditory processing of phonetic versus musical information: a PET study.

    M. Tervaniemi;S. V. Medvedev;K. Alho;K. Alho;S. V. Pakhomov

  • Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects.

    Eino Partanen;Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Mari Tervaniemi;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen

  • Neural representations of abstract stimulus features in the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity.

    Mari Tervaniemi;Sini Maury;Risto Näätänen

  • The amusic brain: in tune, out of key, and unaware.

    Isabelle Peretz;Elvira Brattico;Miika Järvenpää;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain

    Hirooki Yabe;Mari Tervaniemi;Janne Sinkkonen;Janne Sinkkonen;Minna Huotilainen

Frequent Co-Authors

Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Minna Huotilainen
Minna Huotilainen University of Helsinki
Elvira Brattico
Elvira Brattico Aarhus University
Kimmo Alho
Kimmo Alho University of Helsinki
Teija Kujala
Teija Kujala University of Helsinki
Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Peter Vuust
Peter Vuust Royal Academy of Music
Petri Paavilainen
Petri Paavilainen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to various career pathways, including roles in social work. Each state in the USA has specific educational requirements for social workers, often starting with a bachelor's degree but sometimes requiring a master's level qualification. Before choosing your pathway, it’s essential to understand local regulations and licensure standards.

For instance, Texas minimum degree requirement for social workers demonstrates a need for at least a bachelor’s degree in social work (BSW) from an accredited program. Similarly, social worker education requirements in Utah make it clear that different levels of licensure exist, such as SSW and CSW, each with its own educational mandate.

Requirements can also vary significantly, as shown in the Vermont minimum degree requirement for social workers, where certain licenses necessitate advanced degrees. The Virginia education requirements for social workers further highlight a similar progression from bachelor’s to master’s credentials.

Understanding these variations helps students choose the right online degree and prepare for successful, meaningful careers in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mari Tervaniemi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles