World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4362 4033 200 197 203 13618

Thomas Jacobsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Jacobsen between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Jacobsen published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 30 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 10 publications
1985 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Jacobsen: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 5
2000 5
2001 6
2002 5
2003 14
2004 15
2005 3
2006 7
2007 12
2008 5
2009 11
2010 13
2011 10
2012 7
2013 7
2014 9
2015 8
2016 8
2017 13
2018 5
2019 6
2020 11
2021 14
2022 13
2023 11
2024 20
2025 10
Total 261
Download as CSV

Thomas Jacobsen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Jacobsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 203
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Jacobsen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Jacobsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Jacobsen is affiliated with Helmut Schmidt University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and neuroscience, with notable contributions in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Color Perception and Design
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Among their recent papers are:

  • "The Effectiveness of Combat Tactical Breathing as Compared with Prolonged Exhalation," 2020, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
  • "Aesthetic emotions are a key factor in aesthetic evaluation: Reply to Skov and Nadal (2020).", 2020, Psychological Review
  • "Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task", 2022, Psychophysiology
  • "Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life", 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Classification of material substances: Introducing a standards-based approach", 2020, Materials & Design

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Acta Psychologica
  • Scientific Reports
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Thomas Jacobsen's common collaborators include:

  • Mike Wendt
  • Rosalie Weigand
  • Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez
  • Selina M. Weiler
  • Miriam Tomat

Their work spans the integration of multiple sensory modalities, the analysis of aesthetic experiences, and behavioral psychology studies rooted in neural mechanisms. The scientist's research often intersects cognitive and sensory psychology, with a strong emphasis on how perception influences aesthetic evaluation and body image understanding. The combination of these elements positions their scholarship within both theoretical and applied neuroscience contexts.

Best Publications

  • Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty.

    Thomas Jacobsen;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;L. Höfel;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence.

    Risto Näätänen;Thomas Jacobsen;István Winkler

  • Timed picture naming in seven languages

    Elizabeth Bates;Simona D'Amico;Simona D'Amico;Thomas Jacobsen;Anna Székely

  • A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies

    Anna Szekely;Thomas Jacobsen;Simona D'Amico;Simona D'Amico;Antonella Devescovi

  • Bridging the Arts and Sciences: A Framework for the Psychology of Aesthetics

    Thomas Jacobsen

  • The Distancing–Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception

    Winfried Menninghaus;Valentin Wagner;Julian Hanich;Eugen Wassiliwizky

  • Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics.

    Thomas Jacobsen;L. E. A. Höfel

  • Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?

    Thomas Jacobsen;Erich Schröger

  • Towards a Psychological Construct of Being Moved

    Winfried Menninghaus;Valentin Wagner;Julian Hanich;Eugen Wassiliwizky

  • A functional MRI study of happy and sad emotions in music with and without lyrics

    Elvira Brattico;Elvira Brattico;Vinoo Alluri;Brigitte Bogert;Brigitte Bogert;Thomas Jacobsen

  • What are aesthetic emotions

    Winfried Menninghaus;Valentin Wagner;Eugen Wassiliwizky;Ines Schindler

  • Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments.

    Thomas Jacobsen;Lea Höfel

  • Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation.

    Pamela Bäss;Thomas Jacobsen;Erich Schröger

  • Timed action and object naming

    Anna Szekely;Simonetta D'Amico;Simonetta D'Amico;Antonella Devescovi;Kara D Federmeier

  • Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes?

    Lea Höfel;Thomas Jacobsen

  • Toward a Neural Chronometry for the Aesthetic Experience of Music

    Elvira Brattico;Elvira Brattico;Bogert Brigitte Bogert;Thomas Jacobsen

  • Measuring duration mismatch negativity.

    Thomas Jacobsen;Erich Schröger

  • Why We Like to Watch Sad Films: The Pleasure of Being Moved in Aesthetic Experiences

    Julian Hanich;Valentin Wagner;Mira Shah;Thomas Jacobsen

  • Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation.

    Thomas Jacobsen

  • The emotional power of poetry: neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles.

    Eugen Wassiliwizky;Eugen Wassiliwizky;Stefan Koelsch;Stefan Koelsch;Valentin Wagner;Thomas Jacobsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Elvira Brattico
Elvira Brattico Aarhus University
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Ricarda Ines Schubotz
Ricarda Ines Schubotz University of Münster
Stefan Koelsch
Stefan Koelsch University of Bergen
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
D. Yves von Cramon
D. Yves von Cramon Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Andreas Widmann
Andreas Widmann Leipzig University
Elizabeth Bates
Elizabeth Bates University of California, San Diego
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree can set the stage for a rewarding career in mental health, counseling, or research. One of the main concerns for prospective students is affordability, especially when considering both tuition fees and potential return on investment. Luckily, many institutions across the U.S. offer accessible options for students looking to earn a quality psychology degree online or on-campus.

If you're searching for affordable psychology programs in Texas, you'll find a range of respected universities with flexible online and in-person pathways. Similarly, options for affordable psychology degrees in University Park offer students both value and academic rigor. Students in Utah can explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in Utah, which cater to those interested in balancing budget and quality education.

Additionally, Vermont stands out for students seeking the most affordable psychology degree programs in Vermont. Many of these programs also support online learning, making them ideal for those who need scheduling flexibility. Pursuing an affordable psychology degree can open doors to various career pathways, including clinical psychology, counseling, human resources, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Jacobsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles