World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5670
World Ranking
12534
National Ranking
5087

Ashwin Ram publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashwin Ram sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ashwin Ram D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashwin Ram sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ashwin Ram is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States and specializes in computer science, with a focus on several subfields and research topics. Their work primarily spans computer vision and pattern recognition, human-computer interaction, physiology, computer science applications, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics covered in Ashwin Ram's research include interactive and immersive displays, augmented reality applications, image and video quality assessment, gaze tracking and assistive technology, context-aware activity recognition systems, personal information management and user behavior, and human-automation interaction and safety.

Ashwin Ram has contributed to multiple research publications across various venues. Notably, their recent papers include:

  • "GlassMail: Towards Personalised Wearable Assistant for On-the-Go Email Creation on Smart Glasses" (2024) - Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • "PilotAR: Streamlining Pilot Studies with OHMDs from Concept to Insight" (2024) - Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "VidAdapter" (2023) - Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "Does Dynamically Drawn Text Improve Learning? Investigating the Effect of Text Presentation Styles in Video Learning" (2022) - CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "LSVP" (2021) - Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ashwin Ram include Shengdong Zhao, Nuwan Janaka, Runze Cai, K. Sekar, and S. Suresh.

The venues where Ashwin Ram has frequently published reflect the areas of research interest, featuring:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Best Publications

  • Introspective multistrategy learning: on the construction of learning strategies

    Michael T. Cox;Ashwin Ram

  • Experiments with reinforcement learning in problems with continuous state and action spaces

    Juan C. Santamaría;Richard S. Sutton;Ashwin Ram

  • Conversational AI: The Science Behind the Alexa Prize.

    Ashwin Ram;Rohit Prasad;Chandra Khatri;Anushree Venkatesh

  • Using genetic algorithms to learn reactive control parameters for autonomous robotic navigation

    Ashwin Ram;Ronald Arkin;Gary Boone;Michael Pearce

  • Case-Based Planning and Execution for Real-Time Strategy Games

    Santiago Ontañón;Kinshuk Mishra;Neha Sugandh;Ashwin Ram

  • Transfer learning in real-time strategy games using hybrid CBR/RL

    Manu Sharma;Michael Holmes;Juan Santamaria;Arya Irani

  • A theory of questions and question asking

    Ashwin Ram

  • Efficient Feature Selection in Conceptual Clustering

    Mark Devaney;Ashwin Ram

  • Continuous case-based reasoning

    A. Ram;J. C. Santamariá

  • A Theory of Questions and Question Asking

    Ashwin Ram

  • Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Ashwin Ram;Kurt Eiselt

  • Goal-driven learning

    Ashwin Ram;David B. Leake

  • Indexing, Elaboration and Refinement: Incremental Learning of Explanatory Cases

    Ashwin Ram

  • ON‐LINE CASE‐BASED PLANNING

    Santi Ontañón;Kinshuk Mishra;Neha Sugandh;Ashwin Ram

  • DRAMA MANAGEMENT AND PLAYER MODELING FOR INTERACTIVE FICTION GAMES

    Manu Sharma;Santiago Ontañón;Manish Mehta;Ashwin Ram

  • Introspective reasoning using meta-explanations for multistrategy learning

    Ashwin Ram;Michael T. Cox

  • Exploring question subjectivity prediction in community QA

    Baoli Li;Yandong Liu;Ashwin Ram;Ernest V. Garcia

  • On Evaluating and Comparing Conversational Agents

    Anu Venkatesh;Chandra Khatri;Ashwin Ram;Fenfei Guo

  • Cognitive media types for multimedia information access

    Mimi M. Recker;Ashwin Ram;Terry Shikano;George Li

  • Case-based reactive navigation: a method for on-line selection and adaptation of reactive robotic control parameters

    A. Ram;R.C. Arkin;K. Moorman;R.J. Clark

  • Inference to the Best Plan: a Coherence Theory of Decision

    Ashwin Ram;David Leake

Frequent Co-Authors

Santiago Ontañón
Santiago Ontañón Google (United States)
David B. Leake
David B. Leake Indiana University
John Stasko
John Stasko Georgia Institute of Technology
Ronald C. Arkin
Ronald C. Arkin Georgia Institute of Technology
Mark Guzdial
Mark Guzdial University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter Pirolli
Peter Pirolli Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Richard Catrambone
Richard Catrambone Georgia Institute of Technology
Eugene Agichtein
Eugene Agichtein Emory University
Janet L. Kolodner
Janet L. Kolodner Boston College
Raymond Dingledine
Raymond Dingledine Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring options beyond a traditional Computer Science degree can open up new academic and career pathways. For students seeking flexibility, earning an associate degree online is a convenient way to start building technical skills while balancing work or family commitments.

Affordability plays a major role in choosing a program. Luckily, many students are able to lower their costs by finding the cheapest online degrees that still offer quality education and accreditation.

Academic history doesn’t have to be a barrier either. There are several respected college that accepts low gpa applicants, making higher education more accessible.

As you consider your degree options, it’s important to think about the diverse job markets. For example, by asking what can i do with an environmental science degree, you can discover non-traditional tech roles in environmental modeling, data science, and sustainability.

Online learning offers flexible alternatives to the classic university path, connecting you to a vast range of technology-focused careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ashwin Ram

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles