World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
78
Citations
27147
World Ranking
1191
National Ranking
632

John Stasko publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Stasko sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 308 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John Stasko D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Stasko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to information visualization, visual analytics and human-computer interaction
  • 2011 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2011 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

John Stasko is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions spanning subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their scholarly output centers around topics including Data Visualization and Analytics, Multimedia Communication and Technology, Data Analysis with R, Software Engineering Research, Speech and Dialogue Systems, Semantic Web and Ontologies, and Video Analysis and Summarization.

Several venues have frequently published the work of John Stasko. These include:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Computer Graphics Forum

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by John Stasko are:

  • NL4DV: A Toolkit for Generating Analytic Specifications for Data Visualization from Natural Language Queries, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Reaching Broader Audiences With Data Visualization, 2020, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  • Touch? Speech? or Touch and Speech? Investigating Multimodal Interaction for Visual Network Exploration and Analysis, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Understanding the Design Space and Authoring Paradigms for Animated Data Graphics, 2020, Computer Graphics Forum
  • Interweaving Multimodal Interaction With Flexible Unit Visualizations for Data Exploration, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

John Stasko has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Arjun Srinivasan
  • Yu Fu
  • Arpit Narechania
  • Bongshin Lee
  • Alexander Bendeck

The scientist has been recognized with awards such as the IEEE Fellow in 2014 for contributions to information visualization, visual analytics, and human-computer interaction. Additionally, they hold the ACM Senior Member and ACM Distinguished Member titles, both conferred in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Visualization of test information to assist fault localization

    James A. Jones;Mary Jean Harrold;John Stasko

  • Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization

    Ji Soo Yi;Youn ah Kang;J.T. Stasko;J.A. Jacko

  • A Meta-Study of Algorithm Visualization Effectiveness

    Christopher D. Hundhausen;Sarah A. Douglas;John T. Stasko

  • Tango: a framework and system for algorithm animation

    J.T. Stasko

  • Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization

    R. Amar;J. Eagan;J. Stasko

  • Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization

    John Stasko;Carsten Görg;Zhicheng Liu

  • Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations

    J. Stasko;E. Zhang

  • Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life

    Z. Pousman;J.T. Stasko;M. Mateas

  • A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design

    Zachary Pousman;John Stasko

  • Software visualization : programming as a multimedia experience

    John Stasko;John Domingue;Marc H Brown;Blaine Price

  • Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization

    G. Robertson;R. Fernandez;D. Fisher;B. Lee

  • An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures

    John Stasko;Richard Catrambone;Mark Guzdial;Kevin Mcdonald

  • The Value of Information Visualization

    Jean-Daniel Fekete;Jarke J. Wijk;John T. Stasko;Chris North

  • The Information Mural: a technique for displaying and navigating large information spaces

    D.F. Jerding;J.T. Stasko

  • Do algorithm animations assist learning?: an empirical study and analysis

    John Stasko;Albert Badre;Clayton Lewis

  • Mental Models, Visual Reasoning and Interaction in Information Visualization: A Top-down Perspective

    Zhicheng Liu;J T Stasko

  • The science of interaction

    William A. Pike;John Stasko;Remco Chang;Theresa A. O'Connell

  • Evaluating animations as student aids in learning computer algorithms

    Michael D. Byrne;Richard Catrambone;John T. Stasko

  • Jigsaw: Supporting Investigative Analysis through Interactive Visualization

    J. Stasko;C. Gorg;Zhicheng Liu;K. Singhal

  • Falcon: on-line monitoring and steering of large-scale parallel programs

    Weiming Gu;G. Eisenhauer;E. Kraemer;K. Schwan

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Catrambone
Richard Catrambone Georgia Institute of Technology
Mark Guzdial
Mark Guzdial University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jaegul Choo
Jaegul Choo Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Haesun Park
Haesun Park Georgia Institute of Technology
Catherine Plaisant
Catherine Plaisant University of Maryland, College Park
Alex Endert
Alex Endert Georgia Institute of Technology
Bongshin Lee
Bongshin Lee Microsoft (United States)
Ashwin Ram
Ashwin Ram Georgia Institute of Technology
Vaidy S. Sunderam
Vaidy S. Sunderam Emory University
Jean-Daniel Fekete
Jean-Daniel Fekete French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of related career opportunities beyond traditional programming and IT roles. Many students consider expanding their expertise with specialized online degrees that can complement or enhance their job prospects.

For those interested in the rapidly growing field of data protection and system security, an online cyber security degree offers flexible learning and a direct path into high-demand security roles.

If you’re looking at combining technical knowledge with leadership skills, a construction management degree could prepare you for managing complex building projects in both public and private sectors.

Those interested in legal technology or law enforcement can pursue a masters in criminology online, which offers grounding in both theory and practical application across various justice-related roles.

Finally, an online accounting degree is ideal for students wanting to enter the financial sector, data analytics, or auditing, and provides essential business skills that pair well with technical backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing John Stasko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles