World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas E. Cheatham

Thomas E. Cheatham

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
54308
World Ranking
6064
National Ranking
1842

Thomas E. Cheatham publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Cheatham sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 163 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Thomas E. Cheatham D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Cheatham sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas E. Cheatham is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology. They have contributed to a diverse set of topics including DNA and nucleic acid chemistry, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, scientific computing and data management, research data management practices, as well as protein structure and dynamics, and advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques.

The scientist's work also intersects with areas related to information systems and management, covering subjects such as big data and business intelligence alongside ecological studies to a lesser extent.

Thomas E. Cheatham has published extensively, with recent notable papers including:

  • AmberTools, 2023, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Ethidium bromide interactions with DNA: an exploration of a classic DNA-ligand complex with unbiased molecular dynamics simulations, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA2023 Edition, 2023, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • Peptoid Residues Make Diverse, Hyperstable Collagen Triple-Helices, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Sequence-dependent structural properties of B-DNA: what have we learned in 40 years?, 2021, Biophysical Reviews

Frequent coauthors in their collaborative research include Rodrigo Galindo-Murillo, Dana Brunson, Patrick Schmitz, David A. Case, and Lauren Winkler. These collaborations have contributed to the diverse and interdisciplinary nature of their research output.

Thomas E. Cheatham has published in several scientific venues, prominently in:

  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society

Their research covers important topics such as:

  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence

Best Publications

  • The Amber biomolecular simulation programs

    David A. Case;Thomas E. Cheatham;Tom Darden;Holger Gohlke

  • PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data

    Daniel R. Roe;Thomas E. Cheatham

  • Calculating Structures and Free Energies of Complex Molecules: Combining Molecular Mechanics and Continuum Models

    Peter A. Kollman;Irina Massova;Carolina Reyes;Bernd Kuhn

  • Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations

    In Suk Joung;Thomas E. Cheatham

  • AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules

    David A. Pearlman;David A. Case;James W. Caldwell;Wilson S. Ross

  • Refinement of the AMBER Force Field for Nucleic Acids: Improving the Description of α/γ Conformers

    Alberto Pérez;Iván Marchán;Daniel Svozil;Daniel Svozil;Jiri Sponer;Jiri Sponer

  • Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices

    Jayashree Srinivasan;Thomas E. Cheatham;Piotr Cieplak;Peter A. Kollman

  • Refinement of the Cornell et al. Nucleic Acids Force Field Based on Reference Quantum Chemical Calculations of Glycosidic Torsion Profiles

    Marie Zgarbová;Michal Otyepka;Michal Otyepka;Jiří Šponer;Jiří Šponer;Arnošt Mládek

  • A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat.

    Thomas E. Cheatham;Piotr Cieplak;Peter A. Kollman

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Solvated Biomolecular Systems: The Particle Mesh Ewald Method Leads to Stable Trajectories of DNA, RNA, and Proteins

    T. E. Cheatham;J. L. Miller;T. Fox;T. A. Darden

  • Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms.

    Jianyin Shao;Stephen W. Tanner;Nephi Thompson;Thomas E. Cheatham

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Dynamic and Energetic Properties of Alkali and Halide Ions Using Water-Model-Specific Ion Parameters

    In Suk Joung;Thomas E. Cheatham

  • Refinement of the Sugar–Phosphate Backbone Torsion Beta for AMBER Force Fields Improves the Description of Z- and B-DNA

    Marie Zgarbová;Jiří Šponer;Jiří Šponer;Michal Otyepka;Thomas E. Cheatham

  • Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA

    Rodrigo Galindo-Murillo;James C. Robertson;Marie Zgarbová;Jiří Šponer;Jiří Šponer

  • The flying ice cube: Velocity rescaling in molecular dynamics leads to violation of energy equipartition

    Stephen C. Harvey;Robert K.-Z. Tan;Thomas E. Cheatham

  • Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids.

    Thomas E. Cheatham;Peter A. Kollman

  • Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids: successes, limitations, and promise.

    Thomas E. Cheatham;Matthew A. Young

  • Performance of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for RNA Simulations: Stability of UUCG and GNRA Hairpins

    Pavel Banáš;Daniel Hollas;Marie Zgarbová;Petr Jurečka

  • Molecular dynamics simulations highlight the structural differences among DNA: DNA, RNA:RNA, and DNA:RNA hybrid duplexes

    Thomas E. Cheatham;Peter A. Kollman

  • A systematic molecular dynamics study of nearest-neighbor effects on base pair and base pair step conformations and fluctuations in B-DNA

    Richard Lavery;Krystyna Zakrzewska;David Beveridge;Thomas C. Bishop

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiří Šponer
Jiří Šponer Masaryk University
Peter A. Kollman
Peter A. Kollman University of California, San Francisco
David A. Case
David A. Case Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Michal Otyepka
Michal Otyepka Palacký University, Olomouc
Petr Jurečka
Petr Jurečka Palacký University, Olomouc
Jaroslav Koča
Jaroslav Koča Central European Institute of Technology
Modesto Orozco
Modesto Orozco University of Barcelona
Geoffrey C. Fox
Geoffrey C. Fox University of Virginia
David L. Beveridge
David L. Beveridge Wesleyan University
Bernard R. Brooks
Bernard R. Brooks National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career options, including forensic science and legal support roles. For those interested in applying chemistry in law enforcement, a forensic science degree salary can be quite attractive, reflecting the specialized skills required in analyzing evidence. Pursuing an online degree in related fields can offer flexibility and accessibility for working professionals.

Understanding the investment required is crucial before enrolling. Exploring how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help students budget and plan effectively. Many institutions offer affordable options without compromising quality education, especially through online programs.

For beginners or those seeking a foundational entry point, the best online criminal justice associate degree programs provide practical training and credentials for entry-level positions. These programs serve as a stepping stone towards advanced careers or further education.

Additionally, careers such as paralegals benefit from specialized education. Learning about the different types of paralegals and their salaries can guide students in selecting the right paralegal degree and focus area. Combining chemical knowledge with legal expertise can make graduates uniquely qualified for niche roles.

Overall, integrating chemistry with criminal justice or legal studies offers diverse online degree options and career pathways that align with evolving job markets.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas E. Cheatham

Trending Scientists