World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
2972
World Ranking
9480
National Ranking
702

Jon T. Brown publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon T. Brown sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jon T. Brown D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon T. Brown sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon T. Brown is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research focus primarily spans cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, molecular biology, and neurology.

Their scholarly work explores a variety of topics within neuroscience, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

Brown has authored numerous papers with notable recent publications including:

  • EEG microstate complexity for aiding early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Impaired speed encoding and grid cell periodicity in a mouse model of tauopathy, 2020, eLife
  • Relevance of sleep and associated structural changes in GBA1 mouse to human rapid eye movement behavior disorder, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Oral (−)-Epicatechin Inhibits Progressive Tau Pathology in rTg4510 Mice Independent of Direct Actions at GSK3β, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Long-read transcript sequencing identifies differential isoform expression in the entorhinal cortex in a transgenic model of tau pathology, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their research contributions have been published primarily in venues such as Alzheimer's & Dementia, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, eLife, and Frontiers in Neuroscience. Brown's work includes seven publications in Alzheimer's & Dementia and six in bioRxiv.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Jonathan Witton, Thomas Ridler, Millie Sander, Clive Ballard, and Katie Lunnon, reflecting ongoing partnerships in advancing neuroscience studies.

Best Publications

  • LPA1 receptor-deficient mice have phenotypic changes observed in psychiatric disease.

    S.M Harrison;C Reavill;G Brown;J.T Brown

  • Gabapentin is not a GABAB receptor agonist.

    Christophe Lanneau;Andrew Green;Warren D Hirst;Alan Wise

  • EEG microstate complexity for aiding early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

    Luke Tait;Francesco Tamagnini;Francesco Tamagnini;George Stothart;Edoardo Barvas

  • Little or no ability of obestatin to interact with ghrelin or modify motility in the rat gastrointestinal tract

    A K Bassil;Y Häglund;J Brown;Tobias Rudholm

  • Altered intrinsic neuronal excitability and reduced Na+ currents in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Jon T. Brown;Jeannie Chin;Steven C. Leiser;Menelas N. Pangalos

  • Targeting Gut T Cell Ca2+ Release-Activated Ca2+ Channels Inhibits T Cell Cytokine Production and T-Box Transcription Factor T-Bet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Antonio Di Sabatino;Laura Rovedatti;Rejbinder Kaur;Jonathan P. Spencer

  • Characterization of a CNS penetrant, selective M1 muscarinic receptor agonist, 77-LH-28-1

    Christopher J Langmead;Nigel E Austin;Clive L Branch;Jon T Brown

  • Sodium Channel Cleavage Is Associated with Aberrant Neuronal Activity and Cognitive Deficits in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

    Brian F. Corbett;Steven C. Leiser;Huai-Ping Ling;Reka Nagy

  • Old and New Pharmacology: Positive Allosteric Modulation of the α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor by the 5-Hydroxytryptamine2B/C Receptor Antagonist SB-206553 (3,5-Dihydro-5-methyl-N-3-pyridinylbenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]di pyrrole-1(2H)-carboxamide)

    John Dunlop;Tim Lock;Brian Jow;Fabrizio Sitzia

  • TRPM2 is elevated in the tMCAO stroke model, transcriptionally regulated and functionally expressed in C13 microglia

    Elena Fonfria;Cesar Mattei;Kerstin Hill;Jon T Brown

  • Gabapentin fails to alter P/Q‐type Ca2+ channel‐mediated synaptic transmission in the hippocampus in vitro

    Jon T. Brown;Andrew Randall

  • Synaptic activation of GABAB receptors regulates neuronal network activity and entrainment

    Jon T. Brown;Ceri H. Davies;Andrew D. Randall

  • Forced cell cycle exit and modulation of GABAA, CREB, and GSK3β signaling promote functional maturation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons

    Vsevolod Telezhkin;Christian Schnell;Polina Yarova;Sun Yung

  • Activity-dependent depression of the spike after-depolarization generates long-lasting intrinsic plasticity in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons.

    Jon T. Brown;Andrew D. Randall

  • 25th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS-2016

    Tatyana O. Sharpee;Alain Destexhe;Alain Destexhe;Mitsuo Kawato;Vladislav Sekulić;Vladislav Sekulić

  • The functional neurophysiology of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing pathway

    AD Randall;J Witton;CA Booth;A Hynes-Allen

  • Effects of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide on neurones of the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei in vitro.

    H E Reed;D J Cutler;T M Brown;J Brown

  • Intrinsic excitability changes induced by acute treatment of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons with exogenous amyloid β peptide

    Francesco Tamagnini;Sarah Scullion;Jon T. Brown;Jon T. Brown;Andrew D. Randall;Andrew D. Randall

  • Profiles of SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation in an Alzheimer's disease model

    Laura E. McMillan;Jon T. Brown;Jeremy M. Henley;Helena Cimarosti;Helena Cimarosti

  • Altered intrinsic excitability of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in aged PDAPP mice

    Francesco Tamagnini;Janet Novelia;Talitha L. Kerrigan;Jon T. Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew D. Randall
Andrew D. Randall University of Exeter
Menelas N. Pangalos
Menelas N. Pangalos AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Graham L. Collingridge
Graham L. Collingridge Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Anthony N. Burkitt
Anthony N. Burkitt University of Melbourne
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University
Gaute T. Einevoll
Gaute T. Einevoll Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Jeannie Chin
Jeannie Chin Baylor College of Medicine
Stephen J. Moss
Stephen J. Moss Tufts University
Clive W. Coen
Clive W. Coen King's College London
Matt Jones
Matt Jones University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to many diverse career paths—both within and beyond scientific research. If you’re considering flexible study options, many of the easiest degree to get online can complement neuroscience, offering foundational knowledge or specialized skills suitable for a range of industries.

For students focused on quick entry into the workforce or career advancement, earning certifications that pay well can be a smart step. Several online programs also make affordability a priority, including fafsa-approved online certificate programs that help minimize tuition costs and support your educational journey.

Neuroscience majors develop analytical, problem-solving, and research competencies valued in some of the most interesting majors that pay well. Pairing neuroscience study with online certifications—or supplementing with a flexible online degree—can lead to high-earning and fulfilling careers in healthcare, data science, technology, pharmaceuticals, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Jon T. Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles