World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
9864
World Ranking
4752
National Ranking
275

Faranak Farzan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Faranak Farzan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Faranak Farzan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Faranak Farzan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Faranak Farzan is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with notable focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their scientific work encompasses a broad spectrum of topics, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Treatment of Major Depression, Mental Health Research Topics, Neural dynamics and brain function, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Farzan has contributed to numerous publications in several journals. Frequent publication venues include Brain Stimulation, Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Scientific Reports, and Psychological Medicine.

  • TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis (2023, Brain Stimulation)
  • Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021, Psychological Medicine)
  • Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Escitalopram Treatment Outcome From Electroencephalography Recordings in Adult Patients With Depression (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: Recommendations from an IFCN committee (2020, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • Neurophysiological effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment resistant depression (2021, Clinical Neurophysiology)

Farzan frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Key coauthors include Sidney H. Kennedy, Raymond W. Lam, Roumen Milev, Benício N. Frey, and Jane A. Foster.

Best Publications

  • Microstates in resting-state EEG: Current status and future directions

    Arjun Khanna;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Christoph M. Michel;Faranak Farzan;Faranak Farzan

  • Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG

    Sara Tremblay;Sara Tremblay;Nigel C. Rogasch;Isabella Premoli;Daniel M. Blumberger

  • Analysing concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalographic data: A review and introduction to the open-source TESA software

    Nigel C. Rogasch;Caley Sullivan;Richard H. Thomson;Nathan S. Rose

  • Removing artefacts from TMS-EEG recordings using independent component analysis: Importance for assessing prefrontal and motor cortex network properties

    Nigel Craig Rogasch;Richard Hilton Siddall Thomson;Faranak Farzan;Bernadette Fitzgibbon

  • Long-interval cortical inhibition from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS-EEG study.

    Zafiris J Daskalakis;Faranak Farzan;Mera S Barr;Jerome J Maller

  • Optimal transcranial magnetic stimulation coil placement for targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using novel magnetic resonance image-guided neuronavigation

    Pablo M. Rusjan;Mera S. Barr;Faranak Farzan;Tamara Arenovich

  • Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography

    Arjun Khanna;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Faranak Farzan

  • TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis

    Unknown

  • Intermittent theta-burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum increases functional connectivity of the default network.

    Mark A. Halko;Faranak Farzan;Mark C. Eldaief;Jeremy D. Schmahmann

  • MicroRNAs 146a/b-5 and 425-3p and 24-3p are markers of antidepressant response and regulate MAPK/Wnt-system genes.

    Juan Pablo Lopez;Laura M. Fiori;Cristiana Cruceanu;Rixing Lin

  • Evidence for gamma inhibition deficits in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia.

    Faranak Farzan;Mera S Barr;Andrea J Levinson;Robert Chen

  • Characterization of Glutamatergic and GABA A -Mediated Neurotransmission in Motor and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Using Paired-Pulse TMS–EEG

    Robin F H Cash;Yoshihiro Noda;Yoshihiro Noda;Reza Zomorrodi;Natasha Radhu;Natasha Radhu

  • Can Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia? Pilot Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mera S Barr;Faranak Farzan;Tarek K Rajji;Aristotle N Voineskos

  • Characterizing and Modulating Brain Circuitry through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Electroencephalography

    Faranak Farzan;Marine Vernet;Mouhsin M. D. Shafi;Alexander Rotenberg

  • Discovering biomarkers for antidepressant response: protocol from the Canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND) and clinical characteristics of the first patient cohort

    Raymond W. Lam;Roumen Milev;Susan Rotzinger;Susan Rotzinger;Ana C. Andreazza;Ana C. Andreazza

  • Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes

    Edgard Morya;Edgard Morya;Kátia Monte-Silva;Marom Bikson;Zeinab Esmaeilpour

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of aging on motor cortex neurophysiology assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Apoorva Bhandari;Natasha Radhu;Faranak Farzan;Benoit H. Mulsant;Benoit H. Mulsant

  • The Role of the Corpus Callosum in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induced Interhemispheric Signal Propagation

    Aristotle N. Voineskos;Faranak Farzan;Mera S. Barr;Nancy J. Lobaugh

  • The EEG correlates of the TMS-induced EMG silent period in humans

    Faranak Farzan;Mera S Barr;Sylco Hoppenbrouwers;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald

  • Potentiation of gamma oscillatory activity through repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

    Mera S Barr;Faranak Farzan;Pablo M Rusjan;Robert Chen

  • Evidence for excessive frontal evoked gamma oscillatory activity in schizophrenia during working memory

    Mera Barr;Faranak Farzan;Lisa Tran;Robert Chen

  • Gamma oscillations in schizophrenia: Mechanisms and clinical significance

    Yinming Sun;Faranak Farzan;Mera S Barr;Kenji Kirihara

Frequent Co-Authors

Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis University of California - San Diego School of Medicine
Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Mera S. Barr
Mera S. Barr University of Toronto
Tarek K. Rajji
Tarek K. Rajji Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Robert Chen
Robert Chen University Health Network
Daniel M. Blumberger
Daniel M. Blumberger Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Sidney H. Kennedy
Sidney H. Kennedy University Health Network
Peter Giacobbe
Peter Giacobbe University of Toronto
Raymond W. Lam
Raymond W. Lam University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Faranak Farzan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles