World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
42
Citations
7390
World Ranking
557
National Ranking
81

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
9147
World Ranking
6329
National Ranking
2286

Abigail R. Koss publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abigail R. Koss sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Abigail R. Koss D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abigail R. Koss sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Abigail R. Koss is affiliated with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily centers on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with significant contributions in atmospheric science, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, global and planetary change, environmental engineering, and spectroscopy.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, air quality monitoring and forecasting, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, vehicle emissions and performance, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, and atmospheric ozone and climate.

Abigail R. Koss has published research across various peer-reviewed venues. Key publication platforms include Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Environmental Science & Technology, Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Frequent collaborators in their research include J. A. de Gouw, C. Warneke, Matthew M. Coggon, Kanako Sekimoto, and Jesse H. Kroll, reflecting ongoing partnerships that have contributed extensively to studies in atmospheric and environmental sciences.

Significant published works by Abigail R. Koss include:

  • Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Oxygenated Aromatic Compounds are Important Precursors of Secondary Organic Aerosol in Biomass-Burning Emissions, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • A biogenic secondary organic aerosol source of cirrus ice nucleating particles, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Biomass-burning-derived particles from a wide variety of fuels - Part 2: Effects of photochemical aging on particle optical and chemical properties, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • The nitrogen budget of laboratory-simulated western US wildfires during the FIREX 2016 Fire Lab study, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Best Publications

  • Effects of anthropogenic emissions on aerosol formation from isoprene and monoterpenes in the southeastern United States

    Lu Xu;Hongyu Guo;Christopher M. Boyd;Mitchel Klein

  • Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Applications in Atmospheric Sciences

    Bin Yuan;Abigail R. Koss;Abigail R. Koss;Abigail R. Koss;Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;Matthew Coggon;Matthew Coggon

  • Evaluation of a New Reagent-Ion Source and Focusing Ion-Molecule Reactor for Use in Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry.

    Jordan Krechmer;Felipe Lopez-Hilfiker;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Manuel Hutterli

  • High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin

    Peter M. Edwards;Steven S. Brown;James M. Roberts;Ravan Ahmadov

  • Non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning: identification, quantification, and emission factors from PTR-ToF during the FIREX 2016 laboratory experiment

    Abigail R. Koss;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Jessica B. Gilman;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Highly functionalized organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution to secondary organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets

    Ben H. Lee;Claudia Mohr;Felipe D. Lopez-Hilfiker;Anna Lutz

  • Monoterpenes are the largest source of summertime organic aerosol in the southeastern United States

    Haofei Zhang;Haofei Zhang;Lindsay D. Yee;Ben H. Lee;Michael P. Curtis

  • Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry.

    Matthew M Coggon;Matthew M Coggon;Georgios I Gkatzelis;Georgios I Gkatzelis;Brian C McDonald;Jessica B Gilman

  • A large and ubiquitous source of atmospheric formic acid

    D. B. Millet;M. Baasandorj;D. K. Farmer;J. A. Thornton

  • Calculation of the sensitivity of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) for organic trace gases using molecular properties

    Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Shao-Meng Li;Bin Yuan;Bin Yuan;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss

  • Characterization of a real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements

    W. W. Hu;P. Campuzano-Jost;B. B. Palm;D. A. Day

  • Atmospheric fates of Criegee intermediates in the ozonolysis of isoprene

    Tran B. Nguyen;Geoffrey S. Tyndall;John D. Crounse;Alexander P. Teng

  • Organic nitrate aerosol formation via NO 3 + biogenic volatile organic compounds in the southeastern United States

    B. R. Ayres;H. M. Allen;H. M. Allen;D. C. Draper;D. C. Draper;S. S. Brown

  • High- and low-temperature pyrolysis profiles describe volatile organic compound emissions from western US wildfire fuels

    Kanako Sekimoto;Abigail R. Koss;Jessica B. Gilman;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Atmospheric amines and ammonia measured with a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS)

    Y. You;V. P. Kanawade;J. A. de Gouw;Alex B. Guenther;Alex B. Guenther

  • Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil- and natural gas-producing region of the western US

    Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov;S. McKeen;S. McKeen;M. Trainer;R Banta

  • Oxygenated Aromatic Compounds are Important Precursors of Secondary Organic Aerosol in Biomass-Burning Emissions.

    Ali Akherati;Yicong He;Matthew M. Coggon;Matthew M. Coggon;Abigail Koss

  • Diurnal Variability and Emission Pattern of Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) from the Application of Personal Care Products in Two North American Cities.

    Matthew M. Coggon;Matthew M. Coggon;Brian C. McDonald;Brian C. McDonald;Alexander Vlasenko;Patrick R. Veres;Patrick R. Veres

  • Emissions of nitrogen‐containing organic compounds from the burning of herbaceous and arboraceous biomass: Fuel composition dependence and the variability of commonly used nitrile tracers

    Matthew M. Coggon;Matthew M. Coggon;Patrick R. Veres;Patrick R. Veres;Bin Yuan;Bin Yuan;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss

  • Qualitative and quantitative analysis of atmospheric organosulfates in Centreville, Alabama

    Anusha P. S. Hettiyadura;Thilina Jayarathne;Karsten Baumann;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Joint Impacts of Acidity and Viscosity on the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene Epoxydiols (IEPOX) in Phase Separated Particles

    Yue Zhang;Yuzhi Chen;Ziying Lei;Nicole E. Olson

  • OH chemistry of non-methane organic gases (NMOGs) emitted from laboratory and ambient biomass burning smoke: evaluating the influence of furans and oxygenated aromatics on ozone and secondary NMOG formation

    Matthew M. Coggon;Matthew M. Coggon;Christopher Y. Lim;Abigail R. Koss;Abigail R. Koss;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bin Yuan
Bin Yuan Jinan University
Brian M. Lerner
Brian M. Lerner Aerodyne Research
J. A. de Gouw
J. A. de Gouw University of Colorado Boulder
Steven S. Brown
Steven S. Brown National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jessica B. Gilman
Jessica B. Gilman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Allen H. Goldstein
Allen H. Goldstein University of California, Berkeley
Patrick R. Veres
Patrick R. Veres National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Martin Graus
Martin Graus University of Innsbruck
Peter Edwards
Peter Edwards University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and deepen expertise. For instance, public administration plays a vital role in shaping environmental policies. Pursuing one year MPA online programs offers a fast-track route to leadership roles in government and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Social factors are critical to environmental issues, making online bachelors degree programs in sociology a valuable complement. Understanding societal behavior and community dynamics can enhance one’s ability to design effective environmental interventions and promote social equity.

For professionals aiming to lead research or academic initiatives, advanced study options like online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements provide flexible pathways. These programs allow students to attain the highest credentials without the traditional dissertation, facilitating career advancement in academia or industry.

Educators and practitioners seeking to upgrade their qualifications may consider EdS to EdD bridge programs, which offer a seamless transition from specialist degrees to doctoral-level expertise. This progression supports leadership roles in educational or environmental training fields.

Exploring these diverse educational pathways helps Environmental Sciences students align their studies with their career goals and the evolving demands of the field.

Best Scientists Citing Abigail R. Koss

Trending Scientists