World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
8759
World Ranking
4308
National Ranking
1611

Ilana B. Pollack publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilana B. Pollack sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 187 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ilana B. Pollack D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilana B. Pollack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilana B. Pollack is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research focuses broadly on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with particular expertise in atmospheric science and global and planetary change. The scientist's subfields of study include atmospheric science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, safety research, and environmental engineering.

The main topics addressed in their work include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, air quality monitoring and forecasting, and career development and diversity.

Ilana B. Pollack has published several papers in various scientific journals. Notable papers include:

  • Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality (2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
  • HONO Emissions from Western U.S. Wildfires Provide Dominant Radical Source in Fresh Wildfire Smoke (2020, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • Daytime Oxidized Reactive Nitrogen Partitioning in Western U.S. Wildfire Smoke Plumes (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • Emissions of Reactive Nitrogen From Western U.S. Wildfires During Summer 2018 (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • Evaluating the Impact of Chemical Complexity and Horizontal Resolution on Tropospheric Ozone Over the Conterminous US With a Global Variable Resolution Chemistry Model (2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ilana B. Pollack include Emily V. Fischer, Amy P. Sullivan, Jeff Peischl, Jeffrey L. Collett, and F. Flocke.

Publication venues where Ilana B. Pollack has contributed regularly are:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (13 publications)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (6 publications)
  • Environmental Science & Technology (5 publications)
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (3 publications)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States

    Katherine R. Travis;Daniel J. Jacob;Jenny A. Fisher;Patrick S. Kim

  • A large and ubiquitous source of atmospheric formic acid

    D. B. Millet;M. Baasandorj;D. K. Farmer;J. A. Thornton

  • Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United States in spring

    Meiyun Lin;Meiyun Lin;Arlene M. Fiore;Arlene M. Fiore;Larry W. Horowitz;Owen R. Cooper;Owen R. Cooper

  • Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications

    Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;L. Gregory Huey;Robert J. Yokelson;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Nitrogen oxides and PAN in plumes from boreal fires during ARCTAS-B and their impact on ozone: an integrated analysis of aircraft and satellite observations

    M. J. Alvarado;J. A. Logan;J. Mao;E. Apel

  • The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign

    Mary C. Barth;Christopher A. Cantrell;William H. Brune;Steven A. Rutledge

  • Formaldehyde Production from Isoprene Oxidation Across NOx Regimes

    G. M. Wolfe;G. M. Wolfe;J. Kaiser;T. F. Hanisco;F. N. Keutsch

  • Organic aerosol formation downwind from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;A. M. Middlebrook;C. Warneke;C. Warneke;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov

  • Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements from 1960 to 2010

    Ilana B. Pollack;Ilana B. Pollack;Thomas B. Ryerson;Michael Trainer;J. A. Neuman;J. A. Neuman

  • Evaluation of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes for detection of atmospheric NO2 by photolysis - chemiluminescence

    Ilana B. Pollack;Brian M. Lerner;Thomas B. Ryerson

  • Top-down estimate of surface flux in the Los Angeles Basin using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: assessing anthropogenic emissions of CO, NO x and CO 2 and their impacts

    J. Brioude;J. Brioude;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov;S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim

  • Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students

    Paul R Hernandez;Brittany Bloodhart;Rebecca T Barnes;Amanda S Adams

  • Anthropogenic enhancements to production of highly oxygenated molecules from autoxidation

    Havala O. T. Pye;Havala O. T. Pye;Emma L. D’Ambro;Ben H. Lee;Siegfried Schobesberger;Siegfried Schobesberger

  • Atmospheric emissions from the Deepwater Horizon spill constrain air‐water partitioning, hydrocarbon fate, and leak rate

    T. B. Ryerson;K. C. Aikin;K. C. Aikin;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;E. L. Atlas

  • Airborne and ground-based observations of a weekend effect in ozone, precursors, and oxidation products in the California South Coast Air Basin

    I. B. Pollack;I. B. Pollack;T. B. Ryerson;M. Trainer;D. D. Parrish

  • Diode laser-based cavity ring-down instrument for NO 3 , N 2 O 5 , NO, NO 2 and O 3 from aircraft

    N. L. Wagner;N. L. Wagner;W. P. Dubé;W. P. Dubé;R. A. Washenfelder;R. A. Washenfelder;C. J. Young;C. J. Young

  • Airborne measurements of organosulfates over the continental U.S.

    Jin Liao;Jin Liao;Karl D. Froyd;Karl D. Froyd;Daniel M. Murphy;Frank N. Keutsch;Frank N. Keutsch

  • Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality

    Benjamin A. Nault;Benjamin A. Nault;Duseong S. Jo;Duseong S. Jo;Brian C. McDonald;Brian C. McDonald;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Pedro Campuzano-Jost

  • Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx-impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign

    E. C. Apel;R. S. Hornbrook;A. J. Hills;N. J. Blake

  • The glyoxal budget and its contribution to organic aerosol for Los Angeles, California, during CalNex 2010

    R. A. Washenfelder;R. A. Washenfelder;C. J. Young;C. J. Young;S. S. Brown;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine

  • Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol.

    Xiaoxi Liu;Y. Zhang;L. G. Huey;R. J. Yokelson

  • Nighttime Chemical Transformation in Biomass Burning Plumes: A Box Model Analysis Initialized with Aircraft Observations.

    Zachary C J Decker;Zachary C J Decker;Zachary C J Decker;Kyle J Zarzana;Kyle J Zarzana;Matthew Coggon;Matthew Coggon;Kyung-Eun Min;Kyung-Eun Min

  • HONO Emissions from Western U.S. Wildfires Provide Dominant Radical Source in Fresh Wildfire Smoke

    Qiaoyun Peng;Brett B. Palm;Kira E. Melander;Ben H. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Martin Graus
Martin Graus University of Innsbruck
Emily V. Fischer
Emily V. Fischer Colorado State University
John B. Nowak
John B. Nowak Langley Research Center
Steven S. Brown
Steven S. Brown National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Glenn M. Wolfe
Glenn M. Wolfe University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Jin Liao
Jin Liao Goddard Space Flight Center
Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students seek flexible programs with manageable workloads, which is why some look into the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get to balance studies with other commitments.

Degrees like geology and geosciences are closely aligned with environmental studies. Students can pursue a geology degree online, offering a strong foundation in earth sciences without relocating. These programs often prepare graduates for roles in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Another promising pathway is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which is critical for environmental data analysis and mapping. The industry values specialized skills found in the best gis graduate programs. GIS expertise enhances career prospects in urban planning, conservation, and disaster management.

For professionals aiming to impact environmental policy and administration, a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is beneficial. The best online mpa programs offer accelerated options to develop leadership skills tailored to public sector and environmental governance roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ilana B. Pollack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles