World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 45 3823 3523 101 90 132 10238

Leonard Reinecke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leonard Reinecke between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leonard Reinecke published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 21 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leonard Reinecke: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 6
2009 3
2010 6
2011 11
2012 7
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 22
2017 13
2018 13
2019 4
2020 4
2021 15
2022 6
2023 5
2024 13
2025 8
Total 160
Download as CSV

Leonard Reinecke publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard Reinecke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 132 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 132
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Leonard Reinecke D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard Reinecke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260 45
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Leonard Reinecke is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on the intersection of technology, media, and mental health, with extensive contributions in social sciences and psychology.

The scientist's main fields of study include social sciences, psychology, and arts and humanities. Within these disciplines, their subfields of research cover sociology and political science, literature and literary theory, applied psychology, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

Reinecke's recent publications demonstrate a focus on media influence and behavioral health, especially relating to mental well-being and digital technology. Notable papers include:

  • Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review (2020), published in Communication Research
  • Media for Coping During COVID-19 Social Distancing: Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: Combining smartphone logging with experience sampling (2020), published in Media Psychology
  • Feeling Authentic on Social Media: Subjective Authenticity Across Instagram Stories and Posts (2022), published in Social Media + Society
  • Self-regulation as a key boundary condition in the relationship between social media use and well-being (2021), published in Current Opinion in Psychology

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Media Psychology
  • Mobile Media & Communication
  • Communication Research
  • Human Communication Research
  • Technology Mind and Behavior

Leonard Reinecke collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Adrian Meier
  • Benjamin K. Johnson
  • Allison Eden
  • Alicia Gilbert
  • Rebekka Kreling

The topics that characterize Reinecke's research encompass:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Best Publications

  • The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale – psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample

    Eva M. Klein;Elmar Brähler;Michael Dreier;Leonard Reinecke

  • The social side of gaming: How playing online computer games creates online and offline social support

    Sabine Trepte;Leonard Reinecke;Keno Juechems

  • Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication

    Leonard Reinecke;Sabine Trepte

  • Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review:

    Adrian Meier;Leonard Reinecke

  • Games and recovery: The use of video and computer games to recuperate from stress and strain.

    Leonard Reinecke

  • Facebocrastination? Predictors of using Facebook for procrastination and its effects on students well-being

    Adrian Meier;Leonard Reinecke;Christine E. Meltzer

  • Digital Stress over the Life Span: The Effects of Communication Load and Internet Multitasking on Perceived Stress and Psychological Health Impairments in a German Probability Sample

    Leonard Reinecke;Stefan Aufenanger;Manfred E. Beutel;Michael Dreier

  • Avatar Creation and Video Game Enjoyment: Effects of Life-Satisfaction, Game Competitiveness, and Identification With the Avatar

    Sabine Trepte;Leonard Reinecke

  • Media Enjoyment as Need Satisfaction: The Contribution of Hedonic and Nonhedonic Needs

    Ronald Tamborini;Matthew Grizzard;Nicholas David Bowman;Leonard Reinecke

  • Procrastination, Distress and Life Satisfaction across the Age Range - A German Representative Community Study.

    Manfred E. Beutel;Eva M. Klein;Stefan Aufenanger;Elmar Brähler

  • The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study

    Sabine Trepte;Leonard Reinecke

  • The interplay of intrinsic need satisfaction and Facebook specific motives in explaining addictive behavior on Facebook

    Philipp K. Masur;Leonard Reinecke;Marc Ziegele;Oliver Quiring

  • Influence of Social Support Received in Online and Offline Contexts on Satisfaction With Social Support and Satisfaction With Life: A Longitudinal Study

    Sabine Trepte;Tobias Dienlin;Leonard Reinecke

  • Entertainment 2.0? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Need Satisfaction for the Enjoyment of Facebook Use

    Leonard Reinecke;Peter Vorderer;Katharina Knop

  • The routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects

    Leonard Reinecke;Mary Beth Oliver

  • The Guilty Couch Potato: The Role of Ego Depletion in Reducing Recovery Through Media Use

    Leonard Reinecke;Tilo Hartmann;Allison Eden

  • Media Entertainment and Well-Being—Linking Hedonic and Eudaimonic Entertainment Experience to Media-Induced Recovery and Vitality

    Diana Rieger;Leonard Reinecke;Lena Frischlich;Gary Bente

  • Characterizing Mood Management as Need Satisfaction: The Effects of Intrinsic Needs on Selective Exposure and Mood Repair

    Leonard Reinecke;Ron Tamborini;Matthew Grizzard;Robert Lewis

  • A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Privacy Calculus:

    Sabine Trepte;Leonard Reinecke;Nicole B. Ellison;Oliver Quiring

  • Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web

    Sabine Trepte;Leonard Reinecke

  • Entertaining Media Use and the Satisfaction of Recovery Needs: Recovery Outcomes Associated With the Use of Interactive and Noninteractive Entertaining Media

    Leonard Reinecke;Jennifer Klatt;Nicole C. Krämer

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Vorderer
Peter Vorderer University of Mannheim
Klaus Wölfling
Klaus Wölfling Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Ron Tamborini
Ron Tamborini Michigan State University
Gary Bente
Gary Bente Michigan State University
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum
Nicole C. Krämer
Nicole C. Krämer University of Duisburg-Essen
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Elmar Brähler
Elmar Brähler Leipzig University
Moniek Buijzen
Moniek Buijzen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mary Beth Oliver
Mary Beth Oliver Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a wide array of flexible online education and career opportunities in the USA. Many students are now considering online master programs, which offer a faster route to advanced qualifications while fitting around a busy schedule.

Those seeking to accelerate their studies can opt for online accelerated bachelor degree programs, saving both time and money without sacrificing quality. These programs are ideal for learners eager to enter the workforce sooner.

For individuals passionate about social services, there are accessible options like the cheapest online msw programs, which provide a cost-effective pathway into social work careers. Similarly, if your goal is to work in behavioral analysis, pursuing bcba programs online can lead to rewarding opportunities in mental health and education.

By taking advantage of these versatile online degrees, students can tailor their education to their interests and professional goals, enhancing both employability and lifelong learning in the evolving fields of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard Reinecke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles