World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 44 4833 4455 1 1 97 3480

Bassem S. Nabawy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bassem S. Nabawy between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bassem S. Nabawy published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2025. 30 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2025. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 17 publications
2005 2025

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bassem S. Nabawy: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
2014 1
2015 6
2016 7
2017 3
2018 6
2019 8
2020 10
2021 14
2022 14
2023 15
2024 13
2025 17
Total 121
Download as CSV

Bassem S. Nabawy publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bassem S. Nabawy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 97 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376 97
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Bassem S. Nabawy D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bassem S. Nabawy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248 44
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bassem S. Nabawy is affiliated with the National Research Centre in Egypt. Their research activity primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on subfields such as Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Geophysics, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main themes of their work involve Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis, Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Drilling and Well Engineering, and Recycling and Utilization of Industrial and Municipal Waste in Materials Production.

Their recent publications include:

  • Implementation of Rock Typing on Waterflooding Process During Secondary Recovery in Oil Reservoirs: A Case Study, El Morgan Oil Field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt (2021), published in Natural Resources Research
  • Integrated sedimentological and petrophysical characterization for clastic reservoirs: A case study from New Zealand (2021), published in Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • Facies analysis-constrained geophysical 3D-static reservoir modeling of Cenomanian units in the Aghar Oilfield (Western Desert, Egypt): Insights into paleoenvironment and petroleum geology of fluviomarine systems (2021), published in Marine and Petroleum Geology
  • Neural network application to petrophysical and lithofacies analysis based on multi-scale data: An integrated study using conventional well log, core and borehole image data (2021), published in Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • Rock typing and hydraulic flow units as a successful tool for reservoir characterization of Bentiu-Abu Gabra sequence, Muglad basin, southwest Sudan (2020), published in Journal of African Earth Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their research include Ahmed A. Radwan, Saad Mogren, Elkhedr Ibrahim, Ahmed A. Kassem, and Aref Lashin.

The scientist's work is published regularly in these venues:

  • Journal of African Earth Sciences
  • Marine and Petroleum Geology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
  • Natural Resources Research

Best Publications

  • Pore-throat characterization in highly porous and permeable sandstones

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Yves Géraud;Pierre Rochette;Nicolas Bur

  • Integration of Electrofacies and Hydraulic Flow Units to Delineate Reservoir Quality in Uncored Reservoirs: A Case Study, Nubia Sandstone Reservoir, Gulf of Suez, Egypt

    Mohamed S. El Sharawy;Bassem S. Nabawy

  • Formation evaluation using conventional and special core analyses: Belayim Formation as a case study, Gulf of Suez, Egypt

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Moataz Kh. Barakat

  • Reservoir zonation, rock typing and compartmentalization of the Tortonian-Serravallian sequence, Temsah Gas Field, offshore Nile Delta, Egypt

    Bassem S. Nabawy;A.M.K. Basal;Mohammad A. Sarhan;Mona G. Safa

  • Reservoir zonation and discrimination using the routine core analyses data: the Upper Jurassic Sab’atayn sandstones as a case study, Sab’atayn basin, Yemen

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Nabil A. S. A. Al-Azazi

  • Integrated geological and petrophysical characterization of oligocene deep marine unconventional poor to tight sandstone gas reservoir

    Bassam A. Abuamarah;Bassem S. Nabawy;Ahmed M. Shehata;Osama M.K. Kassem

  • Implementation of Rock Typing on Waterflooding Process During Secondary Recovery in Oil Reservoirs: A Case Study, El Morgan Oil Field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt

    Ahmed E. Radwan;Bassem S. Nabawy;Ahmed A. Kassem;Walid S. Hussein

  • Petrophysical and microfacies analysis as a tool for reservoir rock typing and modeling: Rudeis Formation, off-shore October Oil Field, Sinai

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Mohamed A. Rashed;Ahmed S. Mansour;Walaa S.M. Afify

  • Integrated wireline log and seismic attribute analysis for the reservoir evaluation: A case study of the Mount Messenger Formation in Kaimiro Field, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand

    Unknown

  • An integrated workflow for petrophysical characterization, microfacies analysis, and diagenetic attributes of the Lower Jurassic type section in northeastern Africa margin: Implications for subsurface gas prospection

    Unknown

  • Effect of kaolinite as a key factor controlling the petrophysical properties of the Nubia sandstone in central Eastern Desert, Egypt

    Mohamed A. Kassab;Mohamed F. Abu Hashish;Bassem S. Nabawy;Osama M. Elnaggar

  • Facies analysis-constrained geophysical 3D-static reservoir modeling of Cenomanian units in the Aghar Oilfield (Western Desert, Egypt): Insights into paleoenvironment and petroleum geology of fluviomarine systems

    Ahmed A. Radwan;Ahmed A. Radwan;Mohammad A. Abdelwahhab;Bassem S. Nabawy;Kamel H. Mahfouz

  • Integrated sedimentological and petrophysical characterization for clastic reservoirs: A case study from New Zealand

    Ahmed A. Radwan;Bassem S. Nabawy;Ahmed Abdelmaksoud;Ahmed Abdelmaksoud;Aref Lashin;Aref Lashin

  • Neural network application to petrophysical and lithofacies analysis based on multi-scale data: An integrated study using conventional well log, core and borehole image data

    Amer A. Shehata;Osama A. Osman;Bassem S. Nabawy

  • Impacts of pore- and petro-fabrics, mineral composition and diagenetic history on the bulk thermal conductivity of sandstones

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Yves Géraud

  • Reservoir assessment and quality discrimination of Kareem Formation using integrated petrophysical data, Southern Gulf of Suez, Egypt

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Mohamed S. El Sharawy

  • Geological and Petrophysical Characterization of the Lower Senonian Matulla Formation in Southern and Central Gulf of Suez, Egypt

    Mohamed S. El Sharawy;Bassem S. Nabawy

  • Hydrocarbon potential, structural setting and depositional environments of Hammam Faraun Member of the Belayim Formation, Southern Gulf of Suez, Egypt

    Bassem S. Nabawy;Mohamed S. El Sharawy

  • Impacts of the pore- and petro-fabrics on porosity exponent and lithology factor of Archie’s equation for carbonate rocks

    Bassem S. Nabawy

  • Seismic interpretation, reservoir characterization, gas origin and entrapment of the Miocene-Pliocene Mangaa C sandstone, Karewa Gas Field, North Taranaki Basin, New Zealand

    Ahmed A. Radwan;Ahmed A. Radwan;Bassem S. Nabawy;Mohamed Shihata;Mahmoud Leila

  • Estimating porosity and permeability using Digital Image Analysis (DIA) technique for highly porous sandstones

    Bassem S. Nabawy

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Géraud
Yves Géraud University of Lorraine
Pierre Rochette
Pierre Rochette Aix-Marseille University
Christian David
Christian David CY Cergy Paris University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many seniors are finding value in one year degree programs for seniors, which offer specialized skills in a condensed timeframe and are ideal for career shifts or personal enrichment.

Library science is another field linked to Earth Science through environmental information management, archives, and data curation. If you’re wondering is library science a good degree, it often leads to stable roles in academic or government institutions, especially when paired with an understanding of scientific resources.

For those seeking advanced credentials, accredited programs matter. Choosing schools recognized by the professional community ensures quality education. Consider reviewing ala-accredited schools for reputable library and information science programs linked to natural sciences.

Lastly, creative pathways like environmental digital storytelling are gaining popularity. Pursuing an online digital photography degree allows professionals to communicate scientific concepts visually, enhancing public engagement and awareness.

Best Scientists Citing Bassem S. Nabawy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles