World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
58
Citations
15892
World Ranking
2445
National Ranking
20

Mohamed Mahmoud publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Mahmoud sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 755 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mohamed Mahmoud D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Mahmoud sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A holistic overview of underground hydrogen storage: Influencing factors, current understanding, and outlook

    Unknown

  • CO2 enhanced gas recovery and sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs: A review

    Ahmed Hamza;Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein;Mohammed J. Al-Marri;Mohamed Mahmoud

  • Oilfield scale formation and chemical removal: A review

    Muhammad Shahzad Kamal;Ibnelwaleed Hussein;Mohamed Mahmoud;Abdullah S. Sultan

  • Comprehensive review of CO2 geological storage: Exploring principles, mechanisms, and prospects

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of a New Environmentally Friendly Chelating Agent for High-Temperature Applications

    Mohamed A. Mahmoud;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din;Corine De Wolf;James LePage

  • A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery: Techniques Evaluation

    Esmail M. A. Mokheimer;M. Hamdy;Zubairu Abubakar;Mohammad Raghib Shakeel

  • Development of a New Correlation of Gas Compressibility Factor (Z-Factor) for High Pressure Gas Reservoirs

    Unknown

  • Determination of the total organic carbon (TOC) based on conventional well logs using artificial neural network

    Ahmed Abdulhamid A. Mahmoud;Ahmed Abdulhamid A. Mahmoud;Salaheldin Elkatatny;Mohamed Mahmoud;Mohamed Mahmoud;Mohamed Abouelresh;Mohamed Abouelresh

  • Real time prediction of drilling fluid rheological properties using Artificial Neural Networks visible mathematical model (white box)

    Salaheldin Elkatatny;Salaheldin Elkatatny;Zeeshan Tariq;Mohamed Mahmoud;Mohamed Mahmoud

  • A systematic review of data science and machine learning applications to the oil and gas industry

    Zeeshan Tariq;Murtada Saleh Aljawad;Amjed Hasan;Mobeen Murtaza

  • A review on the applications of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the oil and gas industry: laboratory and field-scale measurements

    Unknown

  • Asphaltene precipitation and deposition: A critical review

    Unknown

  • X-ray tomography imaging of shale microstructures: A review in the context of multiscale correlative imaging

    Muhammad Arif;Mohamed Mahmoud;Yihuai Zhang;Stefan Iglauer

  • Wettability of shale–brine–H2system and H2-brine interfacial tension for assessment of the sealing capacities of shale formations during underground hydrogen storage

    Unknown

  • Integration of field, laboratory, and modeling aspects of acid fracturing: A comprehensive review

    Unknown

  • Relative contribution of wettability Alteration and interfacial tension reduction in EOR: A critical review

    Xiao Deng;Zeeshan Tariq;Mobeen Murtaza;Shirish Patil

  • Single stage filter cake removal of barite weighted water based drilling fluid

    B.S. Ba geri;Mohamed Mahmoud;Abdulazeez Abdulraheem;S.H. Al-Mutairi

  • A comprehensive review of proppant transport in fractured reservoirs: Experimental, numerical, and field aspects

    Unknown

  • Fluid–rock interactions and its implications on EOR: Critical analysis, experimental techniques and knowledge gaps

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of a New Environmentally Friendly Chelating Agent for High-Temperature Applications

    Mohamed Ahmednasreldin Mahmoud;Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din;Corine De Wolf;James N. LePage

Frequent Co-Authors

Salaheldin Elkatatny
Salaheldin Elkatatny King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Abdulazeez Abdulraheem
Abdulazeez Abdulraheem King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din
Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din Texas A&M University
Shirish Patil
Shirish Patil King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein
Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein Qatar University
Abdullah S. Sultan
Abdullah S. Sultan King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Eric F. May
Eric F. May University of Western Australia
Michael L. Johns
Michael L. Johns University of Western Australia
Santiago Aparicio
Santiago Aparicio University of Burgos
Mustafa S. Nasser
Mustafa S. Nasser Qatar University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mohamed Mahmoud

Recently Published Articles