World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 77 645 610 228 208 803 24663
Earth Science 75 701 620 338 288 732 23448

Kamy Sepehrnoori publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kamy Sepehrnoori between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kamy Sepehrnoori published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 16.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2017. 81 of the 851 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2017. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 53 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 62 publications 2018: 42 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 52 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 38 publications
1974 2025

851 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kamy Sepehrnoori: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 3
1980 3
1981 6
1982 3
1983 4
1984 5
1985 5
1986 5
1987 8
1988 4
1989 7
1990 9
1991 9
1992 13
1993 7
1994 10
1995 12
1996 11
1997 7
1998 6
1999 6
2000 4
2001 4
2002 5
2003 3
2004 9
2005 10
2006 7
2007 14
2008 16
2009 22
2010 13
2011 12
2012 16
2013 27
2014 53
2015 49
2016 41
2017 62
2018 42
2019 42
2020 48
2021 52
2022 34
2023 41
2024 43
2025 38
Total 851
Download as CSV

Kamy Sepehrnoori publications per year - data summary

  • Kamy Sepehrnoori, a Engineering and Technology scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, has 851 publications recorded across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1974 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 62 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1974, with 1 publication.
  • 4 of the 52 years in the span carry no publications at all (1975, 1976, 1977 and 1978).
  • The rate of publication averages 16.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 17.7 per year counting only the 48 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 208 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1974-1991: 72 publications (4.0 per year); 1992-2009: 166 publications (9.2 per year); 2010-2025: 613 publications (38.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kamy Sepehrnoori publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kamy Sepehrnoori sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 798–803 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 803 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4 803
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Kamy Sepehrnoori publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Kamy Sepehrnoori, a Engineering and Technology scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 803 publications - the 99th percentile of the discipline.
  • 99% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Kamy Sepehrnoori, and about 1% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Kamy Sepehrnoori ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Kamy Sepehrnoori D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kamy Sepehrnoori sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53 77
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Kamy Sepehrnoori D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Kamy Sepehrnoori, a Engineering and Technology scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 77 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Kamy Sepehrnoori, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Kamy Sepehrnoori ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Kamy Sepehrnoori is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering with a particular focus on reservoir engineering and related areas. Their research spans several main topics and subfields that reflect a broad expertise in both theoretical and applied aspects of energy and environmental engineering.

The primary fields of study associated with Sepehrnoori include:

  • Engineering

The subfields of particular interest within this domain are:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Geophysics

The main topics that characterize Sepehrnoori's work highlight a focus on energy resource management and environmental impact considerations:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies

Sepehrnoori has published widely in several venues recognized for their focus on petroleum engineering and energy research. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • SPE Journal
  • SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference
  • Energies
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Sepehrnoori include:

  • Hydrogen Storage Assessment in Depleted Oil Reservoir and Saline Aquifer, 2022, Energies
  • Modification of two-scale continuum model and numerical studies for carbonate matrix acidizing, 2020, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Modeling and Analysis of Carbonate Matrix Acidizing Using a New Two-Scale Continuum Model, 2021, SPE Journal
  • Fractional model for simulating the viscoelastic behavior of artificial fracture in shale gas, 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Shale gas production evaluation framework based on data-driven models, 2022, Petroleum Science

Sepehrnoori has collaborated frequently with several researchers, indicating active engagement in multidisciplinary and cross-institutional research projects. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Wei Yu
  • Mojdeh Delshad
  • Jijun Miao
  • Esmail Eltahan
  • Cunqi Jia

Best Publications

  • Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata

    Hamed Darabi;A. Ettehad;Farzam Javadpour;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Development of an Efficient Embedded Discrete Fracture Model for 3D Compositional Reservoir Simulation in Fractured Reservoirs

    Ali Moinfar;Abdoljalil Varavei;Kamy Sepehrnoori;Russell T. Johns

  • Reservoir Simulation of CO 2 Storage in Aquifers

    Ajitabh Kumar;Myeong H. Noh;Robin C. Ozah;Gary A. Pope

  • A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1 Formulation

    Mojdeh Delshad;Gary A Pope;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Reservoir Simulation of CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers

    A. Kumar;M. Noh;G.A. Pope;K. Sepehrnoori

  • CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery in Bakken tight oil reservoirs

    Wei Yu;Hamid Reza Lashgari;Kan Wu;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Simulation of gas desorption and geomechanics effects for unconventional gas reservoirs

    Wei Yu;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Partitioning Tracer Test for Detection, Estimation, and Remediation Performance Assessment of Subsurface Nonaqueous Phase Liquids

    Minquan Jin;Mojdeh Delshad;Varadarajan Dwarakanath;Daene C. McKinney

  • New Trapping Mechanism in Carbon Sequestration

    Ehsan Saadatpoor;Steven L. Bryant;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • A comprehensive review of low salinity/engineered water injections and their applications in sandstone and carbonate rocks

    Emad W. Al-Shalabi;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Discrete-Fracture Modeling of Complex Hydraulic-Fracture Geometries in Reservoir Simulators

    Yifei Xu;Jose Sergio de Araujo Cavalcante Filho;Wei Yu;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Simulation Study of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process in Bakken Tight Oil Reservoirs

    Wei Yu;Hamid Reza Lashgari;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Modeling Gas Adsorption in Marcellus Shale With Langmuir and BET Isotherms

    Wei Yu;Kamy Sepehrnoori;Tadeusz W. Patzek

  • A mechanistic model of wormhole growth in carbonate matrix acidizing and acid fracturing

    K. M. Hung;A. D. Hill;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Development of a Coupled Dual Continuum and Discrete Fracture Model for the Simulation of Unconventional Reservoirs

    Ali Moinfar;Abdoljalil Varavei;Kamy Sepehrnoori;Russell T. Johns

  • Modeling Dynamic Behaviors of Complex Fractures in Conventional Reservoir Simulators

    Yifei Xu;Wei Yu;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • Performance Evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and Continuous CO2 Injection in Tight Oil Reservoirs

    Pavel Zuloaga;Wei Yu;Jijun Miao;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • A critical review on use of polymer microgels for conformance control purposes

    Mazen Abdulbaki;Chun Huh;Kamy Sepehrnoori;Mojdeh Delshad

  • A laboratory and simulation study of preformed particle gels for water conformance control

    Ali Moazemi Goudarzi;Hao Zhang;Abdoljalil Varavei;Pongpak Taksaudom

  • Simulation of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation

    Chris L. Brown;Gary A. Pope;Linda M. Abriola;Kamy Sepehrnoori

  • A Novel Method To Model Low-Salinity-Water Injection in Carbonate Oil Reservoirs

    Emad W. Al-Shalabi;Kamy Sepehrnoori;Mojdeh Delshad;Gary Pope

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary A. Pope
Gary A. Pope The University of Texas at Austin
Wei Yu
Wei Yu The University of Texas at Austin
Mojdeh Delshad
Mojdeh Delshad The University of Texas at Austin
Carlos Torres-Verdín
Carlos Torres-Verdín The University of Texas at Austin
Steven L. Bryant
Steven L. Bryant University of Calgary
Russell T. Johns
Russell T. Johns Pennsylvania State University
Alfred Daniel Hill
Alfred Daniel Hill Texas A&M University
Gensheng Li
Gensheng Li China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Baojun Bai
Baojun Bai Missouri University of Science and Technology
Tadeusz W Patzek
Tadeusz W Patzek King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider a career in Engineering and Technology, it's important to explore related fields and flexible pathways that can enhance your skills or open new doors. Online degrees and certificate programs offer the flexibility to balance studies with work or other commitments, and many can be completed in less time than traditional programs.

If you’re interested in the business side of technology, options like an accelerated finance degree can be a strategic choice, providing advanced financial management knowledge relevant to tech industries. Similarly, earning an 6 month mba program helps develop leadership and strategic thinking skills demanded in tech-driven organizations.

For those looking to complement their technical expertise with legal or organizational skills, consider enrolling in paralegal certificate programs or pursuing one of the best bookkeeping courses online. These options offer specialized knowledge and can make you more versatile in collaborative, interdisciplinary tech settings.

Exploring these online pathways empowers you to build a diverse, future-ready skill set—whether you’re entering the workforce, shifting careers, or progressing within the technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Kamy Sepehrnoori

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles