World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Annemie Van der Linden

Annemie Van der Linden

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 58 4228 3878 50 46 260 10046

Annemie Van der Linden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annemie Van der Linden between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annemie Van der Linden published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2012. 9 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2012. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications
1985 2025

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annemie Van der Linden: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 6
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 13
2006 7
2007 3
2008 9
2009 8
2010 10
2011 19
2012 21
2013 19
2014 13
2015 12
2016 13
2017 12
2018 14
2019 19
2020 8
2021 11
2022 15
2023 7
2024 7
2025 2
Total 275
Download as CSV

Annemie Van der Linden publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemie Van der Linden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 260 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176 260
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Annemie Van der Linden D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemie Van der Linden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334 58
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Annemie Van der Linden is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and has an extensive publication record primarily within the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, developmental biology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The scientist's work has been disseminated through various publication venues, with the most frequent being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), followed by Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Research Square, Neurobiology of Disease, and Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

Van der Linden has contributed substantially to the following main research topics:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Marine animal studies overview

Notable recent papers from Van der Linden include:

  • "Chemogenetic silencing of neurons in the mouse anterior cingulate area modulates neuronal activity and functional connectivity" (2020), published in NeuroImage
  • "Development of a ligand for in vivo imaging of mutant huntingtin in Huntington's disease" (2022), published in Science Translational Medicine
  • "Resting-State Co-activation Patterns as Promising Candidates for Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease in Aged Mice" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • "Resting-state fMRI reveals longitudinal alterations in brain network connectivity in the zQ175DN mouse model of Huntington's disease" (2023), published in Neurobiology of Disease
  • "Altered basal forebrain function during whole-brain network activity at pre- and early-plaque stages of Alzheimer's disease in TgF344-AD rats" (2022), published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Marleen Verhoye, Johan Van Audekerke, Georgios A. Keliris, Tamara Vasilkovska, and Dorian Pustina, highlighting a pattern of repeated joint research within their scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Proof of concept: enthesitis and new bone formation in spondyloarthritis are driven by mechanical strain and stromal cells

    Peggy Jacques;Stijn Lambrecht;Eveline Verheugen;Elin Pauwels

  • L1 Knockout Mice Show Dilated Ventricles, Vermis Hypoplasia and Impaired Exploration Patterns

    Erik Fransen;Rudi D'Hooge;Guy Van Camp;Marleen Verhoye

  • More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion Kurtosis imaging.

    Jelle Veraart;Dirk H. J. Poot;Dirk H. J. Poot;Wim Van Hecke;Wim Van Hecke;Ines Blockx

  • Functional connectivity fMRI of the rodent brain: comparison of functional connectivity networks in rat and mouse.

    Elisabeth Jonckers;Johan van Audekerke;Geoffrey de Visscher;Annemie Van Der Linden

  • Common functional networks in the mouse brain revealed by multi-centre resting-state fMRI analysis

    Joanes Grandjean;Carola Canella;Cynthia Anckaerts;Gülebru Ayrancı

  • Targeted mutation of Cyln2 in the Williams syndrome critical region links CLIP-115 haploinsufficiency to neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mice

    Casper C. Hoogenraad;Bas Koekkoek;Anna Akhmanova;Harm Krugers

  • Elastin fragmentation in atherosclerotic mice leads to intraplaque neovascularization, plaque rupture, myocardial infarction, stroke, and sudden death

    Carole Van der Donckt;Jozef L. Van Herck;Dorien M. Schrijvers;Greetje Vanhoutte

  • Evaluation of microwave heating digestion and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with continuum source background correction for the determination of iron, copper and cadmium in brine shrimp

    Ronny Blust;Annemie van der Linden;Erik Verheyen;Walter Decleir

  • Reporter gene-expressing bone marrow-derived stromal cells are immune-tolerated following implantation in the central nervous system of syngeneic immunocompetent mice

    Irene Bergwerf;Nathalie De Vocht;Bart Tambuyzer;Jacob Verschueren

  • Different anesthesia regimes modulate the functional connectivity outcome in mice.

    Elisabeth Jonckers;Rafael Delgado y Palacios;Disha Shah;Caroline Guglielmetti

  • The power of using functional fMRI on small rodents to study brain pharmacology and disease

    Elisabeth Jonckers;Disha Shah;Julie Hamaide;Marleen Verhoye

  • Construction and Evaluation of Multitracer Small-Animal PET Probabilistic Atlases for Voxel-Based Functional Mapping of the Rat Brain

    Cindy Casteels;Peter Vermaelen;Johan Nuyts;Annemie Van Der Linden

  • Diffusion kurtosis imaging allows the early detection and longitudinal follow-up of amyloid-β-induced pathology

    Jelle Praet;Nikolay V. Manyakov;Leacky Muchene;Zhenhua Mai;Zhenhua Mai

  • Applications of manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) to image brain plasticity in song birds

    Annemie Van der Linden;Vincent Van Meir;Ilse Tindemans;Marleen Verhoye

  • Mathematical framework for simulating diffusion tensor MR neural fiber bundles.

    A. Leemans;J. Sijbers;M. Verhoye;A. Van der Linden

  • Current status of functional MRI on small animals: application to physiology, pathophysiology, and cognition

    Annemie Van der Linden;Nadja Van Camp;Pedro Ramos-Cabrer;Mathias Hoehn

  • Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy reveal differential hippocampal changes in anhedonic and resilient subtypes of the chronic mild stress rat model.

    Rafael Delgado y Palacios;Adriaan Campo;Kim Henningsen;Marleen Verhoye

  • Comparisons of Different Methods to Train a Young Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia Guttata) to Learn a Song

    Sébastien Derégnaucourt;Colline Poirier;Anne Van der Kant;Annemie Van der Linden

  • Own-Song Recognition in the Songbird Auditory Pathway: Selectivity and Lateralization

    Colline Poirier;Tiny Boumans;Marleen Verhoye;Jacques Balthazart

  • (1)H NMR based metabolomics of CSF and blood serum: a metabolic profile for a transgenic rat model of Huntington disease.

    Kim A. Verwaest;Trung N. Vu;Kris Laukens;Laura E. Clemens;Laura E. Clemens

  • Restoration of MR-induced artifacts in simultaneously recorded MR/EEG data.

    J. Sijbers;I. Michiels;M. Verhoye;J. Van Audekerke

Frequent Co-Authors

Marleen Verhoye
Marleen Verhoye University of Antwerp
Jan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers University of Antwerp
Jacques Balthazart
Jacques Balthazart University of Liège
Zwi N. Berneman
Zwi N. Berneman University of Antwerp
Niel Hens
Niel Hens Hasselt University
Herman Goossens
Herman Goossens University of Antwerp
Rudi D'Hooge
Rudi D'Hooge KU Leuven
Charlotte Cornil
Charlotte Cornil University of Liège
Peter Paul De Deyn
Peter Paul De Deyn University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Annemie Van der Linden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles