World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Annemie Van der Linden

Annemie Van der Linden

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
10046
World Ranking
4228
National Ranking
50

Annemie Van der Linden publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemie Van der Linden sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 260 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Annemie Van der Linden D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemie Van der Linden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Annemie Van der Linden is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and has an extensive publication record primarily within the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, developmental biology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The scientist's work has been disseminated through various publication venues, with the most frequent being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), followed by Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Research Square, Neurobiology of Disease, and Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

Van der Linden has contributed substantially to the following main research topics:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Marine animal studies overview

Notable recent papers from Van der Linden include:

  • "Chemogenetic silencing of neurons in the mouse anterior cingulate area modulates neuronal activity and functional connectivity" (2020), published in NeuroImage
  • "Development of a ligand for in vivo imaging of mutant huntingtin in Huntington's disease" (2022), published in Science Translational Medicine
  • "Resting-State Co-activation Patterns as Promising Candidates for Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease in Aged Mice" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • "Resting-state fMRI reveals longitudinal alterations in brain network connectivity in the zQ175DN mouse model of Huntington's disease" (2023), published in Neurobiology of Disease
  • "Altered basal forebrain function during whole-brain network activity at pre- and early-plaque stages of Alzheimer's disease in TgF344-AD rats" (2022), published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Marleen Verhoye, Johan Van Audekerke, Georgios A. Keliris, Tamara Vasilkovska, and Dorian Pustina, highlighting a pattern of repeated joint research within their scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Proof of concept: enthesitis and new bone formation in spondyloarthritis are driven by mechanical strain and stromal cells

    Peggy Jacques;Stijn Lambrecht;Eveline Verheugen;Elin Pauwels

  • L1 Knockout Mice Show Dilated Ventricles, Vermis Hypoplasia and Impaired Exploration Patterns

    Erik Fransen;Rudi D'Hooge;Guy Van Camp;Marleen Verhoye

  • More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion Kurtosis imaging.

    Jelle Veraart;Dirk H. J. Poot;Dirk H. J. Poot;Wim Van Hecke;Wim Van Hecke;Ines Blockx

  • Functional connectivity fMRI of the rodent brain: comparison of functional connectivity networks in rat and mouse.

    Elisabeth Jonckers;Johan van Audekerke;Geoffrey de Visscher;Annemie Van Der Linden

  • Common functional networks in the mouse brain revealed by multi-centre resting-state fMRI analysis

    Joanes Grandjean;Carola Canella;Cynthia Anckaerts;Gülebru Ayrancı

  • Targeted mutation of Cyln2 in the Williams syndrome critical region links CLIP-115 haploinsufficiency to neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mice

    Casper C. Hoogenraad;Bas Koekkoek;Anna Akhmanova;Harm Krugers

  • Elastin fragmentation in atherosclerotic mice leads to intraplaque neovascularization, plaque rupture, myocardial infarction, stroke, and sudden death

    Carole Van der Donckt;Jozef L. Van Herck;Dorien M. Schrijvers;Greetje Vanhoutte

  • Evaluation of microwave heating digestion and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with continuum source background correction for the determination of iron, copper and cadmium in brine shrimp

    Ronny Blust;Annemie van der Linden;Erik Verheyen;Walter Decleir

  • Reporter gene-expressing bone marrow-derived stromal cells are immune-tolerated following implantation in the central nervous system of syngeneic immunocompetent mice

    Irene Bergwerf;Nathalie De Vocht;Bart Tambuyzer;Jacob Verschueren

  • Different anesthesia regimes modulate the functional connectivity outcome in mice.

    Elisabeth Jonckers;Rafael Delgado y Palacios;Disha Shah;Caroline Guglielmetti

  • The power of using functional fMRI on small rodents to study brain pharmacology and disease

    Elisabeth Jonckers;Disha Shah;Julie Hamaide;Marleen Verhoye

  • Construction and Evaluation of Multitracer Small-Animal PET Probabilistic Atlases for Voxel-Based Functional Mapping of the Rat Brain

    Cindy Casteels;Peter Vermaelen;Johan Nuyts;Annemie Van Der Linden

  • Diffusion kurtosis imaging allows the early detection and longitudinal follow-up of amyloid-β-induced pathology

    Jelle Praet;Nikolay V. Manyakov;Leacky Muchene;Zhenhua Mai;Zhenhua Mai

  • Applications of manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) to image brain plasticity in song birds

    Annemie Van der Linden;Vincent Van Meir;Ilse Tindemans;Marleen Verhoye

  • Mathematical framework for simulating diffusion tensor MR neural fiber bundles.

    A. Leemans;J. Sijbers;M. Verhoye;A. Van der Linden

  • Current status of functional MRI on small animals: application to physiology, pathophysiology, and cognition

    Annemie Van der Linden;Nadja Van Camp;Pedro Ramos-Cabrer;Mathias Hoehn

  • Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy reveal differential hippocampal changes in anhedonic and resilient subtypes of the chronic mild stress rat model.

    Rafael Delgado y Palacios;Adriaan Campo;Kim Henningsen;Marleen Verhoye

  • Comparisons of Different Methods to Train a Young Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia Guttata) to Learn a Song

    Sébastien Derégnaucourt;Colline Poirier;Anne Van der Kant;Annemie Van der Linden

  • Own-Song Recognition in the Songbird Auditory Pathway: Selectivity and Lateralization

    Colline Poirier;Tiny Boumans;Marleen Verhoye;Jacques Balthazart

  • (1)H NMR based metabolomics of CSF and blood serum: a metabolic profile for a transgenic rat model of Huntington disease.

    Kim A. Verwaest;Trung N. Vu;Kris Laukens;Laura E. Clemens;Laura E. Clemens

  • Restoration of MR-induced artifacts in simultaneously recorded MR/EEG data.

    J. Sijbers;I. Michiels;M. Verhoye;J. Van Audekerke

Frequent Co-Authors

Marleen Verhoye
Marleen Verhoye University of Antwerp
Jan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers University of Antwerp
Jacques Balthazart
Jacques Balthazart University of Liège
Zwi N. Berneman
Zwi N. Berneman University of Antwerp
Niel Hens
Niel Hens Hasselt University
Herman Goossens
Herman Goossens University of Antwerp
Rudi D'Hooge
Rudi D'Hooge KU Leuven
Charlotte Cornil
Charlotte Cornil University of Liège
Peter Paul De Deyn
Peter Paul De Deyn University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Annemie Van der Linden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles