World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4760
World Ranking
11765
National Ranking
740

Benjamin Bach publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Bach sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 106 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Benjamin Bach D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Bach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin Bach is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the intersection of computer science and medicine, highlighting a focus on both computational methods and clinical applications. The main fields of study include Computer Science and Medicine, with significant contributions to the subfields of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Infectious Diseases, Artificial Intelligence, Neurology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas that illustrate expertise in data-driven analysis and health-related studies. These topics include:

  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Multimedia Communication and Technology

Benjamin Bach has contributed to multiple high-profile publications, including notable recent papers such as:

  • "SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-B.1.1.529 leads to widespread escape from neutralizing antibody responses," 2022, published in Cell
  • "Co-infections, secondary infections, and antimicrobial use in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave from the ISARIC WHO CCP-UK study: a multicentre, prospective cohort study," 2021, published in The Lancet Microbe
  • "Inflammatory profiles across the spectrum of disease reveal a distinct role for GM-CSF in severe COVID-19," 2021, published in Science Immunology
  • "Outcome of Hospitalization for COVID-19 in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease. An International Multicenter Study," 2020, published in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Development and validation of the ISARIC 4C Deterioration model for adults hospitalised with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study," 2021, published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Benjamin Bach include:

  • J. Kenneth Baillie
  • Peter Openshaw
  • Malcolm G. Semple
  • Beatrice Alex
  • Laura Merson

Benjamin Bach often publishes in venues known for computational and medical research. The frequent publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications

Best Publications

  • The Hologram in My Hand: How Effective is Interactive Exploration of 3D Visualizations in Immersive Tangible Augmented Reality?

    Benjamin Bach;Ronell Sicat;Johanna Beyer;Maxime Cordeil

  • Matrix reordering methods for table and network visualization

    Michael Behrisch;Benjamin Bach;Nathalie Henry Riche;Tobias Schreck

  • GraphDiaries: Animated Transitions andTemporal Navigation for Dynamic Networks

    Benjamin Bach;Emmanuel Pietriga;Jean-Daniel Fekete

  • Timelines Revisited: A Design Space and Considerations for Expressive Storytelling

    Matthew Brehmer;Bongshin Lee;Benjamin Bach;Nathalie Henry Riche

  • Weighted graph comparison techniques for brain connectivity analysis

    Basak Alper;Benjamin Bach;Nathalie Henry Riche;Tobias Isenberg

  • Time Curves: Folding Time to Visualize Patterns of Temporal Evolution in Data

    Benjamin Bach;Conglei Shi;Nicolas Heulot;Tara Madhyastha

  • A Review of Temporal Data Visualizations Based on Space-Time Cube Operations

    Benjamin Bach;Pierre Dragicevic;Daniel Archambault;Christophe Hurter

  • Grand Challenges in Immersive Analytics

    Barrett Ens;Benjamin Bach;Maxime Cordeil;Ulrich Engelke

  • DXR: A Toolkit for Building Immersive Data Visualizations

    Ronell Sicat;Jiabao Li;Junyoung Choi;Maxime Cordeil

  • A Descriptive Framework for Temporal Data Visualizations Based on Generalized Space-Time Cubes

    B. Bach;P. Dragicevic;D. Archambault;C. Hurter

  • Visualizing dynamic networks with matrix cubes

    Benjamin Bach;Emmanuel Pietriga;Jean-Daniel Fekete

  • Design Patterns for Data Comics

    Benjamin Bach;Zezhong Wang;Matteo Farinella;Dave Murray-Rust

  • Small MultiPiles: Piling Time to Explore Temporal Patterns in Dynamic Networks

    B. Bach;N. Henry-Riche;T. Dwyer;T. Madhyastha

  • IATK: An Immersive Analytics Toolkit

    Maxime Cordeil;Andrew Cunningham;Benjamin Bach;Christophe Hurter

  • Telling Stories about Dynamic Networks with Graph Comics

    Benjamin Bach;Natalie Kerracher;Kyle Wm. Hall;Sheelagh Carpendale

  • The Emerging Genre of Data Comics

    Benjamin Bach;Nathalie Henry Riche;Sheelagh Carpendale;Hanspeter Pfister

  • Towards Unambiguous Edge Bundling: Investigating Confluent Drawings for Network Visualization

    Benjamin Bach;Nathalie Henry Riche;Christophe Hurter;Kim Marriott

  • Comparing Effectiveness and Engagement of Data Comics and Infographics

    Zezhong Wang;Shunming Wang;Matteo Farinella;Dave Murray-Rust

  • Information Visualization Evaluation Using Crowdsourcing

    Rita Borgo;Luana Micallef;Benjamin Bach;Fintan McGee

  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and outcomes of COVID-19 in the ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK cohort: a matched, prospective cohort study.

    Thomas M Drake;Cameron J Fairfield;Riinu Pius;Stephen R Knight

  • Immersive Analytics

    Bongshin Lee;Benjamin Bach;Tim Dwyer;Kim Marriott

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Daniel Fekete
Jean-Daniel Fekete French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Tim Dwyer
Tim Dwyer Monash University
Hanspeter Pfister
Hanspeter Pfister Harvard University
Nathalie Henry Riche
Nathalie Henry Riche Microsoft (United States)
Kim Marriott
Kim Marriott Monash University
Bongshin Lee
Bongshin Lee Microsoft (United States)
Min Chen
Min Chen University of Oxford
Sheelagh Carpendale
Sheelagh Carpendale Simon Fraser University
Pierre Dragicevic
Pierre Dragicevic French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Tobias Isenberg
Tobias Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science degree online programs provides flexibility for students balancing work and personal commitments. Online degrees allow learners to study at their own pace, access quality education remotely, and often complete their studies faster using accelerated options.

Many students worry about admissions requirements, especially if their previous academic performance wasn’t ideal. If you’re concerned about GPA, learn which will grad schools accept low gpa and how holistic admissions processes can benefit non-traditional students.

Computer science isn’t the only related field you can consider. For those interested in applying technology to sustainability, online environmental degrees are an excellent option. See what career opportunities are possible by reading what can i do with an environmental science degree. Additionally, finding affordable, high-quality online engineering programs is possible—discover your options with this resource on environmental engineering schools online.

Whether you are pursuing computer science or related disciplines, a wide range of flexible online pathways exists to help you meet your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Bach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles