What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Microeconomics
Jeffrey P. Carpenter mainly focuses on Social psychology, Microeconomics, Dictator game, Public good and Altruism.
Many of his research projects under Social psychology are closely connected to Risk aversion with Risk aversion, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
He combines subjects such as Distrust and Ultimatum game with his study of Dictator game.
His Public good research incorporates elements of Public economics, Social dilemma, Social preferences and Punishment.
His Public economics research focuses on Free riding and how it connects with Demographic economics.
His Social dilemma study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Prisoner's dilemma, Time preference and Loss aversion.
His most cited work include:
- Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World (410 citations)
- Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. (369 citations)
- Punishing free-riders: How group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods (278 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Jeffrey P. Carpenter mainly investigates Incentive, Microeconomics, Social psychology, Affect and Public good.
His Incentive research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Reciprocity and Labour economics.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Norm and Principal.
His research investigates the connection between Social psychology and topics such as Perception that intersect with issues in Fishing.
Jeffrey P. Carpenter has included themes like Distortion, Public economics and Punishment in his Public good study.
His Free rider problem research includes elements of Subgame and Free riding.
He most often published in these fields:
- Incentive (35.85%)
- Microeconomics (32.08%)
- Social psychology (26.89%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Incentive (35.85%)
- Social psychology (26.89%)
- Microeconomics (32.08%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Incentive, Social psychology, Microeconomics, Welfare and Affect.
Incentive connects with themes related to Public good in his study.
His Public good research also works with subjects such as
- Altruism which is related to area like Positive economics,
- Opportunity cost that intertwine with fields like Public economics.
When carried out as part of a general Social psychology research project, his work on Debiasing and Social dilemma is frequently linked to work in Availability heuristic, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
His work in Microeconomics addresses issues such as Reciprocity, which are connected to fields such as Competitive equilibrium and Profit sharing.
His research integrates issues of Interpersonal communication, Intrapersonal communication, Competition and Grit in his study of Affect.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Exploitation Aversion: When Financial Incentives Fail to Motivate Agents (9 citations)
- Profit Sharing and Peer Reporting (6 citations)
- Using raffles to fund public goods: Lessons from a field experiment ☆ (5 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Microeconomics
Jeffrey P. Carpenter spends much of his time researching Incentive, Microeconomics, Social psychology, Reciprocity and Affect.
The various areas that he examines in his Incentive study include Intrinsic motivation, Compliance, Crowding and Mechanism design.
Many of his studies on Microeconomics involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Public economics.
His Social psychology research includes themes of Competition and Risk perception, Perception.
His Reciprocity study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Competitive equilibrium.
His work carried out in the field of Affect brings together such families of science as Debiasing, Categorization, Prosocial behavior and Social dilemma.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
