World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine C. Eckel

Catherine C. Eckel

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
61
Citations
22894
World Ranking
772
National Ranking
483

Catherine C. Eckel publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine C. Eckel sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 199 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Catherine C. Eckel D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine C. Eckel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine C. Eckel is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the social sciences. Their work primarily spans areas such as experimental behavioral economics, taxation and compliance, cultural and economic development, decision-making, financial markets, political conflict, and psychology related to moral and emotional judgment.

Their research output includes publications in prominent venues with a significant focus on experimental and behavioral economic studies. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • European Economic Review
  • Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
  • Experimental Economics

Major fields of study covered in their research are social sciences with notable subfields in safety research, sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, demography, and general decision sciences.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Subsidizing unit donations: matches, rebates, and discounts compared, 2021, Experimental Economics
  • Independent vs. Coordinated Fundraising: Understanding the Role of Information, 2020, European Economic Review
  • Heterogeneity of Beliefs and Trading Behavior: A Reexamination, 2023, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
  • Heterogeneity of Beliefs and Trading Behavior - A Reexamination, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Democratic Peace: An experimental test of a causal relation and of underlying mechanisms, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal

Catherine C. Eckel has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Philip J. Grossman
  • Lata Gangadharan
  • Rick K. Wilson
  • Christopher Hoy
  • Lionel Page

Their work covers main topics reflecting interests in experimental behavioral economics studies, taxation and compliance studies, culture, economy and development studies, decision-making and behavioral economics, financial markets and investment strategies, political conflict and governance, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

Best Publications

  • Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence

    Catherine Eckel;Philip Grossman

  • Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Are Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence

    Catherine Eckel;Philip Grossman

  • Managing diversity by creating team identity

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face

    Jörn P.W Scharlemann;Catherine C Eckel;Alex Kacelnik;Rick K Wilson

  • Is trust a risky decision

    Catherine C. Eckel;Rick K. Wilson

  • Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better?

    Chetan Dave;Catherine C. Eckel;Cathleen A. Johnson;Christian Rojas

  • Status in Markets

    Sheryl Ball;Catherine Eckel;Philip J. Grossman;William Zame

  • Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?

    Catherine C Eckel;Philip J Grossman

  • Judging a Book by its Cover: Beauty and Expectations in the Trust Game

    Rick K. Wilson;Catherine C. Eckel

  • Risk loving after the storm: A Bayesian-Network study of Hurricane Katrina evacuees

    Catherine C. Eckel;Mahmoud A. El-Gamal;Rick K. Wilson

  • The relative price of fairness: gender differences in a punishment game'

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman;Rachel M. Johnston

  • Privatization and efficiency: Industry effects of the sale of British Airways☆

    Catherine Eckel;Doug Eckel;Vijay Singal

  • Chapter 57 Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • Rebates Versus Matching: Does How We Subsidize Charitable Contributions Matter?

    Catherine C. Eckel;Philip J. Grossman

  • The Value of a Smile: Game Theory with a Human Face

    Catherine C. Eckel;Rick K. Wilson;Jorn Scharlemann;Alex Kacelnik

  • Status in Markets

    Catherine C. Eckel;Sheryl B. Ball;Philip J. Grossman;William R. Zame

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Grossman
Philip J. Grossman Monash University
Rachel Croson
Rachel Croson University of Minnesota
Herbert Gintis
Herbert Gintis Santa Fe Institute
Charles A. Holt
Charles A. Holt University of Virginia
James C. Murdoch
James C. Murdoch The University of Texas at Dallas
J. Lawrence Aber
J. Lawrence Aber New York University
Emilio F. Moran
Emilio F. Moran Michigan State University
Sandra L. Hofferth
Sandra L. Hofferth University of Maryland, College Park
Uri Gneezy
Uri Gneezy University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can be a fast and flexible way to launch a career in Economics and Finance. Many students today choose programs like a finance fast track program for accelerated learning. These condensed courses allow you to complete a bachelor's degree in finance more quickly than traditional timelines, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

For students looking to advance their careers or specialize further, mba fast track programs are another excellent option. These programs are designed for busy professionals who want to earn their MBA in less time and with more flexibility, making it easier to balance work and study.

Not everyone needs a full degree to secure a strong job in finance. A best bookkeeping certification online can quickly build foundational skills for entry-level positions or those looking to upskill.

For those interested in office management and administrative roles in finance firms, you might consider office management degrees. These associate programs prepare you for organizing business operations and supporting financial teams effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine C. Eckel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles