World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
18222
World Ranking
3336
National Ranking
1883

Sandra L. Hofferth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra L. Hofferth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sandra L. Hofferth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra L. Hofferth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra L. Hofferth is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences, with specific attention to education, sociology and political science, and communication as subfields.

The main topics covered in their work include child development and digital technology, the impact of technology on adolescents, and social media and politics. These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach that intersects technology use and social behavior among youth and broader societal dimensions.

Recent publications by Sandra L. Hofferth include the paper titled A Comparative Time-Diary Analysis of UK and US Children's Screen Time and Device Use, published in 2021 in the journal Child Indicators Research. This publication investigates the comparative aspects of screen time and device usage among children in the UK and the US, contributing to understanding digital behavior in childhood.

Frequent co-authorship appears with Killian Mullan, indicating a collaborative research dynamic. Publication venues are concentrated in Child Indicators Research, reflecting a focus on child-related social indicators and research methodologies.

  • Child Indicators Research

  • Killian Mullan

  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Media and Politics

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication

  • A Comparative Time-Diary Analysis of UK and US Children's Screen Time and Device Use (2021) in Child Indicators Research

Best Publications

  • Fatherhood in the Twenty-First Century

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Robert H. Bradley;Sandra Hofferth

  • Children's Time With Fathers in Intact Families

    W. Jean Yeung;John F. Sandberg;Pamela E. Davis-Kean;Sandra L. Hofferth

  • How American Children Spend Their Time

    Sandra L. Hofferth;John F. Sandberg

  • Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy, and Childbearing.

    Childbearing;Cheryl D. Hayes;Sandra L. Hofferth

  • Are All Dads Equal? Biology versus Marriage as a Basis for Paternal Investment

    Sandra L. Hofferth;Kermyt G. Anderson

  • Changes in children's time with parents: United States, 1981-1997.

    John F. Sandberg;Sandra L. Hofferth

  • Race/Ethnic Differences in Father Involvement in Two-Parent Families: Culture, Context, or Economy?

    Sandra L. Hofferth

  • Social Capital in Rural and Urban Communities

    Sandra L. Hofferth;John Iceland

  • Early childbearing and later economic well-being.

    Sandra L. Hofferth;Kristin A. Moore

  • Residential Father Family Type and Child Well-being: Investment Versus Selection

    Sandra L. Hofferth

  • The effects of early childbearing on schooling over time.

    Sandra L. Hofferth;Lori Reid;Frank L. Mott

  • Price, Quality, and Income in Child Care Choice.

    Sandra L. Hofferth;Douglas A. Wissoker

  • Kin Networks, Race, and Family Structure.

    Sandra L. Hofferth

  • Premarital sexual activity among U.S. teenage women over the past three decades.

    Hofferth Sl;Kahn;Baldwin W

  • The Demography of Fathers: What Fathers Do

    Sandra L. Hofferth;Joseph Pleck;Jeffrey L. Stueve;Suzanne Bianchi

  • Changes in American children's time, 1981–1997

    Sandra L. Hofferth;John F. Sandberg

  • Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy, and Childbearing, Volume II: Working Papers and Statistical Appendices

    Childbearing;Sandra L. Hofferth;Cheryl D. Hayes

  • American children's use of electronic media in 1997: A national survey

    John C Wright;Aletha C Huston;Elizabeth A Vandewater;David S Bickham

  • Patterns and predictors of father-infant engagement across race/ethnic groups.

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Sandra L. Hofferth;Soo Chae

  • Changes in American children’s time – 1997 to 2003

    Sandra L. Hofferth

  • Changes in Children's Time with Parents

    John F. Sandberg;Sandra L. Hofferth

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristin A. Moore
Kristin A. Moore Child Trends
Frances K. Goldscheider
Frances K. Goldscheider University of Maryland, College Park
Emilio F. Moran
Emilio F. Moran Michigan State University
Natasha J. Cabrera
Natasha J. Cabrera University of Maryland, College Park
Greg J. Duncan
Greg J. Duncan University of California, Irvine
Joseph H. Pleck
Joseph H. Pleck University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Barbara Entwisle
Barbara Entwisle University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Catherine C. Eckel
Catherine C. Eckel Texas A&M University
J. Lawrence Aber
J. Lawrence Aber New York University
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology students often explore related degrees and career pathways such as social work, counseling, and mental health services. Online degrees in these fields have become increasingly popular, offering flexibility and accessibility for learners across the USA.

Many students are mindful of the financial commitment of higher education. There are a range of affordable social work degrees in Kansas designed to minimize costs while delivering quality instruction. For those in the South, several affordable social work programs in Little Rock stand out as promising options for cost-effective social work education.

Aspiring social workers in New England can pursue some of the most affordable social work degree programs in Massachusetts, which prepare graduates for diverse roles in community and healthcare settings. Similarly, those in the Midwest seeking value-driven programs should review available affordable social work degrees in Madison, balancing affordability and career preparation.

Exploring these pathways empowers psychology students to expand their expertise while making informed financial and career decisions.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra L. Hofferth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles