World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 89 998 873 623 533 275 30148

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2013. 12 of the 314 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2013. 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 14 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
1986 2025

314 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 3
1987 2
1988 0
1989 2
1990 5
1991 2
1992 3
1993 3
1994 5
1995 3
1996 12
1997 2
1998 8
1999 11
2000 5
2001 1
2002 14
2003 4
2004 8
2005 6
2006 7
2007 7
2008 14
2009 12
2010 8
2011 8
2012 13
2013 29
2014 9
2015 8
2016 18
2017 9
2018 7
2019 10
2020 12
2021 10
2022 14
2023 8
2024 8
2025 4
Total 314
Download as CSV

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda publications per year - data summary

  • Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, a Psychology scholar from New York University, has 314 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 29 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2001, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 40 years in the span carries no publications at all (1988).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.1 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 44 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 61 publications (4.4 per year); 2000-2013: 136 publications (9.7 per year); 2014-2025: 117 publications (9.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 275
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, a Psychology scholar from New York University, records 275 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 89
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, a Psychology scholar from New York University, records 89 D-Index - the 92nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 92% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, and about 8% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with a strong emphasis on developmental and educational psychology. They have contributed extensively to topics related to child development and language acquisition.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, subfields of particular interest encompass:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Psychology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Their scholarly work covers diverse topics such as:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication

Recent publications illustrate the scope and focus of their research. Some notable papers include:

  • "Where language meets attention: How contingent interactions promote learning," 2021, published in Developmental Review
  • "Infant exuberant object play at home: Immense amounts of time-distributed, variable practice," 2021, published in Child Development
  • "Cracking the code: Social and contextual cues to language input in the home environment," 2020, published in Infancy
  • "Joint engagement in the home environment is frequent, multimodal, timely, and structured," 2022, published in Infancy
  • "Infants' object interactions are long and complex during everyday joint engagement," 2022, published in Developmental Science

Their research appears frequently in journals such as:

  • Infancy
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Child Development
  • Developmental Science
  • Developmental Psychology

Frequent coauthors working alongside this scientist include:

  • Karen E. Adolph
  • Catalina Suárez-Rivera
  • Lillian R. Masek
  • Orit Herzberg
  • Mackenzie S. Swirbul

Best Publications

  • Fatherhood in the Twenty-First Century

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Robert H. Bradley;Sandra Hofferth

  • Maternal responsiveness and children's achievement of language milestones.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Marc H. Bornstein;Lisa Baumwell

  • Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: contributions to language and cognitive development.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Jacqueline D. Shannon;Natasha J. Cabrera;Michael E. Lamb

  • Mother–Child Bookreading in Low‐Income Families: Correlates and Outcomes During the First Three Years of Life

    Helen Raikes;Barbara Alexander Pan;Gayle Luze;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Fathers' Influence on Their Children's Cognitive and Emotional Development: From Toddlers to Pre-K

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Jacqueline D. Shannon;Catherine Tamis-LeMonda

  • Parents' Goals for Children: The Dynamic Coexistence of Individualism and Collectivism in Cultures and Individuals.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Niobe Way;Diane Hughes;Hirokazu Yoshikawa

  • Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children

    Marc H. Bornstein;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Natasha J. Cabrera

  • Why Is Infant Language Learning Facilitated by Parental Responsiveness

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Yana Kuchirko;Lulu Song

  • Maternal Responsiveness to Young Children at Three Ages: Longitudinal Analysis of a Multidimensional, Modular, and Specific Parenting Construct

    Marc H. Bornstein;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Chun Shin Hahn;O. Maurice Haynes

  • Trajectories of the Home Learning Environment Across the First 5 Years: Associations With Children's Vocabulary and Literacy Skills at Prekindergarten

    Eileen T. Rodriguez;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Family resources and parenting quality: Links to children's cognitive development across the first 3 years.

    Julieta Lugo-Gil;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Language Matters: Denying the Existence of the 30-Million-Word Gap Has Serious Consequences

    Roberta Michnick Golinkoff;Erika Hoff;Meredith L. Rowe;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Maternal verbal sensitivity and child language comprehension

    Lisa Baumwell;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Marc H. Bornstein

  • Maternal responsiveness to infants in three societies: the United States, France, and Japan

    Marc H. Bornstein;Catherine S. Tamis‐LeMonda;Joseph Tal;Pamela Ludemann

  • Transition From Crawling to Walking and Infants’ Actions With Objects and People

    Lana B. Karasik;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Karen E. Adolph

  • Familismo in Mexican and Dominican Families From Low-Income,Urban Communities:

    Esther J. Calzada;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Hirokazu Yoshikawa

  • The Acquisition of Gender Labels in Infancy: Implications for Gender-Typed Play.

    Kristina M. Zosuls;Diane N. Ruble;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Patrick E. Shrout

  • The Role of the Father: An Introduction.

    Michael E. Lamb;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play, and representational competence.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Marc H. Bornstein

  • Chinese parents’ goals and practices in early childhood

    Rufan Luo;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Lulu Song

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc H. Bornstein
Marc H. Bornstein National Institutes of Health
Natasha J. Cabrera
Natasha J. Cabrera University of Maryland, College Park
Karen E. Adolph
Karen E. Adolph New York University
Hirokazu Yoshikawa
Hirokazu Yoshikawa New York University
Diane N. Ruble
Diane N. Ruble New York University
Alan L. Mendelsohn
Alan L. Mendelsohn New York University
Bruce D. Homer
Bruce D. Homer City University of New York
Helen Raikes
Helen Raikes University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Robert H. Bradley
Robert H. Bradley Arizona State University
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of psychology grows, students have more online degree options and career pathways than ever before. For those interested in the intersection of law and mental health, forensic psychology doctoral programs online offer advanced training for careers in legal and criminal justice settings.

If working with children and schools is your passion, consider nasp approved school psychology programs online. These programs are tailored for those wanting to support student well-being and development, and they meet key accreditation standards.

For those seeking a quicker path to graduate credentials, explore the best 1-year master's in psychology online programs. These intensive programs can help you build expertise and qualify for advanced roles in just twelve months.

The demand for behavior specialists is also rising. applied behavior analysis programs equip graduates with the skills needed to support individuals with behavioral challenges in diverse professional settings.

Choosing the right online program can open doors to rewarding careers in psychology, counseling, education, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles