World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
89
Citations
30148
World Ranking
998
National Ranking
623

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with a strong emphasis on developmental and educational psychology. They have contributed extensively to topics related to child development and language acquisition.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, subfields of particular interest encompass:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Psychology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Their scholarly work covers diverse topics such as:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication

Recent publications illustrate the scope and focus of their research. Some notable papers include:

  • "Where language meets attention: How contingent interactions promote learning," 2021, published in Developmental Review
  • "Infant exuberant object play at home: Immense amounts of time-distributed, variable practice," 2021, published in Child Development
  • "Cracking the code: Social and contextual cues to language input in the home environment," 2020, published in Infancy
  • "Joint engagement in the home environment is frequent, multimodal, timely, and structured," 2022, published in Infancy
  • "Infants' object interactions are long and complex during everyday joint engagement," 2022, published in Developmental Science

Their research appears frequently in journals such as:

  • Infancy
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Child Development
  • Developmental Science
  • Developmental Psychology

Frequent coauthors working alongside this scientist include:

  • Karen E. Adolph
  • Catalina Suárez-Rivera
  • Lillian R. Masek
  • Orit Herzberg
  • Mackenzie S. Swirbul

Best Publications

  • Fatherhood in the Twenty-First Century

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Robert H. Bradley;Sandra Hofferth

  • Maternal responsiveness and children's achievement of language milestones.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Marc H. Bornstein;Lisa Baumwell

  • Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: contributions to language and cognitive development.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Jacqueline D. Shannon;Natasha J. Cabrera;Michael E. Lamb

  • Mother–Child Bookreading in Low‐Income Families: Correlates and Outcomes During the First Three Years of Life

    Helen Raikes;Barbara Alexander Pan;Gayle Luze;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Fathers' Influence on Their Children's Cognitive and Emotional Development: From Toddlers to Pre-K

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Jacqueline D. Shannon;Catherine Tamis-LeMonda

  • Parents' Goals for Children: The Dynamic Coexistence of Individualism and Collectivism in Cultures and Individuals.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Niobe Way;Diane Hughes;Hirokazu Yoshikawa

  • Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children

    Marc H. Bornstein;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Natasha J. Cabrera

  • Why Is Infant Language Learning Facilitated by Parental Responsiveness

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Yana Kuchirko;Lulu Song

  • Maternal Responsiveness to Young Children at Three Ages: Longitudinal Analysis of a Multidimensional, Modular, and Specific Parenting Construct

    Marc H. Bornstein;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Chun Shin Hahn;O. Maurice Haynes

  • Trajectories of the Home Learning Environment Across the First 5 Years: Associations With Children's Vocabulary and Literacy Skills at Prekindergarten

    Eileen T. Rodriguez;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Family resources and parenting quality: Links to children's cognitive development across the first 3 years.

    Julieta Lugo-Gil;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Language Matters: Denying the Existence of the 30-Million-Word Gap Has Serious Consequences

    Roberta Michnick Golinkoff;Erika Hoff;Meredith L. Rowe;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Maternal verbal sensitivity and child language comprehension

    Lisa Baumwell;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Marc H. Bornstein

  • Maternal responsiveness to infants in three societies: the United States, France, and Japan

    Marc H. Bornstein;Catherine S. Tamis‐LeMonda;Joseph Tal;Pamela Ludemann

  • Transition From Crawling to Walking and Infants’ Actions With Objects and People

    Lana B. Karasik;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Karen E. Adolph

  • Familismo in Mexican and Dominican Families From Low-Income,Urban Communities:

    Esther J. Calzada;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Hirokazu Yoshikawa

  • The Acquisition of Gender Labels in Infancy: Implications for Gender-Typed Play.

    Kristina M. Zosuls;Diane N. Ruble;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Patrick E. Shrout

  • The Role of the Father: An Introduction.

    Michael E. Lamb;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play, and representational competence.

    Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Marc H. Bornstein

  • Chinese parents’ goals and practices in early childhood

    Rufan Luo;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Lulu Song

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc H. Bornstein
Marc H. Bornstein National Institutes of Health
Natasha J. Cabrera
Natasha J. Cabrera University of Maryland, College Park
Karen E. Adolph
Karen E. Adolph New York University
Hirokazu Yoshikawa
Hirokazu Yoshikawa New York University
Diane N. Ruble
Diane N. Ruble New York University
Alan L. Mendelsohn
Alan L. Mendelsohn New York University
Bruce D. Homer
Bruce D. Homer City University of New York
Helen Raikes
Helen Raikes University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Robert H. Bradley
Robert H. Bradley Arizona State University
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of psychology grows, students have more online degree options and career pathways than ever before. For those interested in the intersection of law and mental health, forensic psychology doctoral programs online offer advanced training for careers in legal and criminal justice settings.

If working with children and schools is your passion, consider nasp approved school psychology programs online. These programs are tailored for those wanting to support student well-being and development, and they meet key accreditation standards.

For those seeking a quicker path to graduate credentials, explore the best 1-year master's in psychology online programs. These intensive programs can help you build expertise and qualify for advanced roles in just twelve months.

The demand for behavior specialists is also rising. applied behavior analysis programs equip graduates with the skills needed to support individuals with behavioral challenges in diverse professional settings.

Choosing the right online program can open doors to rewarding careers in psychology, counseling, education, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles