World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 103 542 471 338 284 407 45029

Linda B. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda B. Smith between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda B. Smith published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2010. 14 of the 453 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2010. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1975 2025

453 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda B. Smith: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 3
1978 2
1979 3
1980 2
1981 3
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 2
1987 3
1988 5
1989 4
1990 1
1991 3
1992 7
1993 4
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 7
1998 9
1999 5
2000 9
2001 10
2002 6
2003 9
2004 8
2005 10
2006 16
2007 16
2008 24
2009 26
2010 32
2011 22
2012 14
2013 23
2014 24
2015 12
2016 14
2017 22
2018 14
2019 18
2020 8
2021 6
2022 10
2023 8
2024 10
2025 4
Total 453
Download as CSV

Linda B. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda B. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 407 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 407
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda B. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda B. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48 103
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2013 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2013 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition
  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Linda B. Smith is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Statistics and Probability, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research encompasses topics such as Child and Animal Learning Development, Language Development and Disorders, Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, Face Recognition and Perception, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, Hearing Impairment and Communication, and Reading and Literacy Development.

Linda B. Smith has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cognition
  • Infancy
  • Developmental Science

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • What are the building blocks of parent-infant coordinated attention in free-flowing interaction? (2020, Infancy)
  • The infant's view redefines the problem of referential uncertainty in early word learning (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Real-world statistics at two timescales and a mechanism for infant learning of object names (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • The temporal structure of parent talk to toddlers about objects (2022, Cognition)
  • Learning the generative principles of a symbol system from limited examples (2020, Cognition)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Linda B. Smith include:

  • Chen Yu
  • T. Rowan Candy
  • Lei Yuan
  • Kelly S. Mix
  • Drew H. Abney

Linda B. Smith has received several notable recognitions throughout their career:

  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2019)
  • APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association (2013)
  • David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition (2013)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2007)

Best Publications

  • A Dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action

    Esther Thelen;Linda B. Smith

  • The dynamics of embodiment: a field theory of infant perseverative reaching.

    Esther Thelen;Gregor Schöner;Christian Scheier;Linda B. Smith

  • The importance of shape in early lexical learning

    Barbara Landau;Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones

  • Dynamic Systems Theories

    Esther Thelen;Linda B. Smith

  • Development as a dynamic system

    Linda B. Smith;Esther Thelen

  • Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics

    Linda Smith;Chen Yu

  • Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics:

    Chen Yu;Linda B. Smith

  • The Development of Embodied Cognition: Six Lessons from Babies

    Linda Smith;Michael Gasser

  • Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention

    Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones;Barbara Landau;Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe

  • Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism?

    Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones;Barbara Landau

  • Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition

    James L. McClelland;Matthew M. Botvinick;David C. Noelle;David C. Plaut

  • Knowing in the context of acting: the task dynamics of the A-not-B error.

    Linda B. Smith;Esther Thelen;Robert Titzer;Dewey McLin

  • Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers.

    Chen Yu;Linda B. Smith

  • A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications.

    Linda B. Smith;Esther Thelen

  • Joint attention without gaze following: human infants and their parents coordinate visual attention to objects through eye-hand coordination.

    Chen Yu;Linda B. Smith

  • Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond?

    Larissa K. Samuelson;Linda B. Smith

  • Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment

    Linda B. Smith

  • The place of perception in children's concepts ☆

    Susan S Jones;Linda B Smith

  • Object Properties and Knowledge in Early Lexical Learning.

    Susan S. Jones;Linda B. Smith;Barbara Landau

  • Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development

    Linda B. Smith;Deborah G. Kemler

Frequent Co-Authors

Chen Yu
Chen Yu The University of Texas at Austin
Susan Jones
Susan Jones University of Nottingham
Esther Thelen
Esther Thelen Indiana University
Larissa K. Samuelson
Larissa K. Samuelson University of East Anglia
Barbara Landau
Barbara Landau Johns Hopkins University
Kelly S. Mix
Kelly S. Mix University of Maryland, College Park
David J. Crandall
David J. Crandall Indiana University
Angelo Cangelosi
Angelo Cangelosi University of Manchester
Robert L. Goldstone
Robert L. Goldstone Indiana University
John P. Spencer
John P. Spencer University of East Anglia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of rewarding careers, particularly in counseling and behavioral health services. Many students consider careers such as substance abuse counseling, which require specialized education, training, and certification. Each state and city may have unique requirements that aspiring professionals should be aware of.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Cincinnati, it is important to meet local educational standards and obtain the right credentials. Similar considerations apply when learning about Cleveland substance abuse counselors education requirements or becoming a substance abuse counselor in Colorado Springs.

For those looking at opportunities in Columbus, understanding Columbus substance abuse counselor certification requirements is essential. Online degrees in psychology or counseling can help you meet these requirements, providing the flexibility to study from anywhere while advancing your career. Always review local licensing criteria to ensure you are on the right pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Linda B. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles