World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
45783
World Ranking
4966
National Ranking
2697

Val J. Lowe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Val J. Lowe sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 911 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Val J. Lowe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Val J. Lowe sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Val J. Lowe is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with extensive work in several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, Neurology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Lowe's research topics cover a range of subjects related to brain health and neurodegenerative diseases. These include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Their scholarly output includes contributions to notable journals and publication venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Neurology
  • Brain Communications
  • Brain
  • Neurobiology of Aging

Recent significant papers authored by or including Val J. Lowe are:

  • Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes, 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • Visualization of neurofibrillary tangle maturity in Alzheimer's disease: A clinicopathologic perspective for biomarker research, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Comparison of Plasma Phosphorylated Tau Species With Amyloid and Tau Positron Emission Tomography, Neurodegeneration, Vascular Pathology, and Cognitive Outcomes, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • Deep learning-based brain age prediction in normal aging and dementia, 2022, Nature Aging

Lowe collaborates frequently with a group of researchers including Clifford R. Jack, Ronald C. Petersen, David S. Knopman, Jonathan Graff-Radford, and Christopher G. Schwarz. These coauthors have worked extensively with Lowe across numerous studies, collectively advancing research on neurodegenerative diseases through clinical and imaging approaches.

Best Publications

  • Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer's disease.

    Clifford R. Jack Jr.;Val J. Lowe;Stephen D Weigand;Heather J. Wiste

  • Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology

    James W. Fletcher;James W. Fletcher;Benjamin Djulbegovic;Heloisa P. Soares;Barry A. Siegel

  • 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Clifford R. Jack;Val J. Lowe;Matthew L. Senjem;Stephen D. Weigand

  • Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;Terry M. Therneau

  • Positron emission tomography scanning in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

    M.Akram Khan;Connie S Combs;Elizabeth M Brunt;Val J Lowe

  • Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules

    V. J. Lowe;J. W. Fletcher;L. Gobar;M. Lawson

  • Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning.

    E F Patz;V J Lowe;J M Hoffman;S S Paine

  • An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Clifford R. Jack;David S. Knopman;Stephen D. Weigand;Heather J. Wiste

  • Plasma phospho-tau181 increases with Alzheimer's disease clinical severity and is associated with tau- and amyloid-positron emission tomography.

    Michelle M. Mielke;Clinton E. Hagen;Jing Xu;Xiyun Chai

  • Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0.

    Ian Law;Nathalie L. Albert;Javier Arbizu;Ronald Boellaard;Ronald Boellaard

  • An autoradiographic evaluation of AV-1451 Tau PET in dementia.

    Val J. Lowe;Geoffry Curran;Ping Fang;Amanda M. Liesinger

  • Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer's disease.

    Clifford R Jack;Heather J Wiste;Christopher G Schwarz;Val J Lowe

  • Characterizing a neurodegenerative syndrome: primary progressive apraxia of speech

    Keith Anthony Josephs;Joseph R Duffy;Edythe Strand;Mary Margaret Machulda

  • Brain β-amyloid load approaches a plateau

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Timothy G. Lesnick;Stephen D. Weigand

  • Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72

    Bradley F. Boeve;Kevin B. Boylan;Neill R. Graff-Radford;Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez

  • Age, Sex, and APOE ε4 Effects on Memory, Brain Structure, and β-Amyloid Across the Adult Life Span

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;David S. Knopman

  • Dissecting phenotypic traits linked to human resilience to Alzheimer’s pathology

    Beatriz G. Perez-Nievas;Thor D. Stein;Hwan Ching Tai;Oriol Dols-Icardo

  • Age-specific population frequencies of cerebral β-amyloidosis and neurodegeneration among people with normal cognitive function aged 50–89 years: a cross-sectional study

    Clifford R Jack;Heather J Wiste;Stephen D Weigand;Walter A Rocca

  • Semiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities.

    V. J. Lowe;J. M. Hoffman;D. M. DeLong;E. F. Patz

  • Recommendations on the Use of 18 F-FDG PET in Oncology

    James W. Fletcher;Benjamin Djulbegovic;Heloisa P. Soares;Barry A. Siegel

Frequent Co-Authors

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Medicine doesn’t always mean medical school. There are a range of alternative online degrees that can open rewarding healthcare career pathways. For those interested in healthcare leadership, earning a graduate-level degree, like a cahme accredited online mha programs list, offers valuable training in managing hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses (RNs) looking to advance their credentials without traditional hurdles can explore the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These programs allow working nurses to earn a BSN flexibly and completely online.

For nurses who aspire to hold advanced practice or leadership roles, a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) can be the next step. There are options for those seeking a faster route, such as the shortest dnp program online and the shortest dnp program.

These degree options support career growth in healthcare without the need to attend campus full-time. If you’re exploring paths beyond traditional medical education, these online programs provide flexible alternatives tailored to your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Val J. Lowe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles