World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mary M. Machulda

Mary M. Machulda

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
75
Citations
19624
World Ranking
1797
National Ranking
1057

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
22812
World Ranking
1682
National Ranking
820

Mary M. Machulda publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary M. Machulda sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 558 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mary M. Machulda D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary M. Machulda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary M. Machulda is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable contributions in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. The primary focus areas include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Neurological Disorders and Treatments.

Key recent publications by Mary M. Machulda include:

  • Associations of amyloid and neurodegeneration plasma biomarkers with comorbidities, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Progressive dysexecutive syndrome due to Alzheimer's disease: a description of 55 cases and comparison to other phenotypes, 2020, Brain Communications
  • Longitudinal neuroimaging biomarkers differ across Alzheimer's disease phenotypes, 2020, Brain
  • Tau and Amyloid Relationships with Resting-state Functional Connectivity in Atypical Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • Comparison of plasma neurofilament light and total tau as neurodegeneration markers: associations with cognitive and neuroimaging outcomes, 2021, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mary M. Machulda include Clifford R. Jack, Ronald C. Petersen, Keith A. Josephs, Val J. Lowe, and David S. Knopman.

The research output is often published in specialized venues such as Alzheimer's & Dementia, Neurology, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Brain Communications, and Journal of Neurology.

Best Publications

  • Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;Terry M. Therneau

  • Plasma phospho-tau181 increases with Alzheimer's disease clinical severity and is associated with tau- and amyloid-positron emission tomography.

    Michelle M. Mielke;Clinton E. Hagen;Jing Xu;Xiyun Chai

  • Assessing the Temporal Relationship Between Cognition and Gait: Slow Gait Predicts Cognitive Decline in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging

    Michelle M. Mielke;Rosebud O. Roberts;Rodolfo Savica;Ruth Cha

  • Comparison of memory fMRI response among normal, MCI, and Alzheimer’s patients

    M. M. Machulda;H. A. Ward;B. Borowski;J. L. Gunter

  • Non-Stationarity in the ``Resting Brain's'' Modular Architecture

    David T. Jones;Prashanthi Vemuri;Matthew C. Murphy;Jeffrey L. Gunter

  • Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer's disease.

    Clifford R Jack;Heather J Wiste;Christopher G Schwarz;Val J Lowe

  • Association Between Olfactory Dysfunction and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease Dementia

    Rosebud O Roberts;Teresa J H Christianson;Walter K Kremers;Michelle M Mielke

  • Characterizing a neurodegenerative syndrome: primary progressive apraxia of speech

    Keith Anthony Josephs;Joseph R Duffy;Edythe Strand;Mary Margaret Machulda

  • Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72

    Bradley F. Boeve;Kevin B. Boylan;Neill R. Graff-Radford;Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez

  • Age, Sex, and APOE ε4 Effects on Memory, Brain Structure, and β-Amyloid Across the Adult Life Span

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;David S. Knopman

  • Age-related changes in the default mode network are more advanced in Alzheimer disease

    D.T. Jones;M.M. Machulda;P. Vemuri;E.M. McDade

  • Age-specific and sex-specific prevalence of cerebral β-amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration in cognitively unimpaired individuals aged 50–95 years: a cross-sectional study

    Clifford R Jack;Heather J Wiste;Stephen D Weigand;Terry M Therneau

  • Vascular and amyloid pathologies are independent predictors of cognitive decline in normal elderly.

    Prashanthi Vemuri;Timothy G. Lesnick;Scott A. Przybelski;David S. Knopman

  • Associations of Amyloid, Tau, and Neurodegeneration Biomarker Profiles With Rates of Memory Decline Among Individuals Without Dementia

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Terry M. Therneau;Stephen D. Weigand

  • Widespread brain tau and its association with ageing, Braak stage and Alzheimer's dementia.

    Val J Lowe;Heather J Wiste;Matthew L Senjem;Stephen D Weigand

  • Plasma and CSF neurofilament light: Relation to longitudinal neuroimaging and cognitive measures.

    Michelle M. Mielke;Jeremy A. Syrjanen;Kaj Blennow;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Different definitions of neurodegeneration produce similar amyloid/neurodegeneration biomarker group findings

    Clifford R Jr. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;David S Knopman

  • Prevalence of Biologically vs Clinically Defined Alzheimer Spectrum Entities Using the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Research Framework.

    Clifford R. Jack;Terry M. Therneau;Stephen D. Weigand;Heather J. Wiste

  • Effect of APOE ε4 Status on Intrinsic Network Connectivity in Cognitively Normal Elderly Subjects

    Mary M. Machulda;David T. Jones;Prashanthi Vemuri;Eric McDade;Eric McDade

  • Association of lifetime intellectual enrichment with cognitive decline in the older population

    Prashanthi Vemuri;Timothy G. Lesnick;Scott A. Przybelski;Mary Machulda

  • Association of elevated amyloid levels with cognition and biomarkers in cognitively normal people from the community

    Ronald Carl Petersen;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;Walter A Rocca

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Val J. Lowe
Val J. Lowe Mayo Clinic
Keith A. Josephs
Keith A. Josephs Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related degree programs and future career opportunities. Many students interested in the workings of the mind also explore fields such as psychology, counseling, therapy, and social work. With the increasing availability of accredited online programs, there are now more flexible options than ever.

For those considering the therapy route, online mft programs accredited by leading institutions can prepare graduates to become licensed therapists. If you'd prefer a broader focus, you might be interested in the cheapest online master's degree in psychology, which offers advanced studies in human behavior and research methods.

Undergraduates can take advantage of options to study psychology online, saving both time and money while building foundational knowledge. Additionally, students who are passionate about helping communities may want to explore the easiest msw programs to get into for a fulfilling career in social work.

Each of these pathways can complement neuroscience studies, offering alternative or interdisciplinary careers in mental health, research, and social services.

Best Scientists Citing Mary M. Machulda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles