World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rosebud O. Roberts

Rosebud O. Roberts

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
34565
World Ranking
8037
National Ranking
4172

Rosebud O. Roberts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosebud O. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rosebud O. Roberts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosebud O. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rosebud O. Roberts is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has produced research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans subfields including General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics, and Clinical Psychology.

The primary topics covered in Roberts' research involve Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Health Systems with a focus on Economic Evaluations and Quality of Life, Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, as well as Health and Well-being Studies related to health, psychology, and well-being.

Roberts has contributed to academic literature through publications in notable venues such as Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology and the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Their recent papers include:

  • Brain amyloid, cortical thickness, and changes in activities of daily living, 2020, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • Medical Doctors and Dementia: A Longitudinal Study, 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Frequent collaborators in their research include Maria Vassilaki, Walter K. Kremers, Michelle M. Mielke, Yonas E. Geda, and Mary M. Machulda, each having co-authored multiple publications with Roberts.

Best Publications

  • Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later.

    Ronald Carl Petersen;Rosebud O Roberts;David S Knopman;Bradley F Boeve

  • Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;Terry M. Therneau

  • Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment is higher in men. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

    R. C. Petersen;R. O. Roberts;D. S. Knopman;Y. E. Geda

  • Classification and epidemiology of MCI.

    Rosebud Roberts;David S. Knopman

  • Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention.

    Steven J. Jacobsen;Debra J. Jacobson;Cynthia J. Girman;Rosebud O. Roberts

  • The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Design and Sampling, Participation, Baseline Measures and Sample Characteristics

    Rosebud O. Roberts;Yonas E. Geda;David S. Knopman;Ruth H. Cha

  • An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Clifford R. Jack;David S. Knopman;Stephen D. Weigand;Heather J. Wiste

  • Association of mediterranean diet with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Balwinder Singh;Ajay K. Parsaik;Michelle M. Mielke;Patricia J. Erwin

  • Plasma phospho-tau181 increases with Alzheimer's disease clinical severity and is associated with tau- and amyloid-positron emission tomography.

    Michelle M. Mielke;Clinton E. Hagen;Jing Xu;Xiyun Chai

  • Physical exercise, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study.

    Yonas E. Geda;Rosebud O. Roberts;David S. Knopman;Teresa J.H. Christianson

  • Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures.

    Rosebud O. Roberts;Erik J. Bergstralh;Luanne Schmidt;Steven J. Jacobsen

  • Assessing the Temporal Relationship Between Cognition and Gait: Slow Gait Predicts Cognitive Decline in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging

    Michelle M. Mielke;Rosebud O. Roberts;Rodolfo Savica;Ruth Cha

  • Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Normal Cognitive Aging: Population-Based Study

    Yonas E. Geda;Rosebud O. Roberts;David S. Knopman;Ronald C. Petersen

  • Higher risk of progression to dementia in mild cognitive impairment cases who revert to normal

    Rosebud O Roberts;David S Knopman;Michelle M Mielke;Ruth H. Cha

  • Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer's disease.

    Clifford R Jack;Heather J Wiste;Christopher G Schwarz;Val J Lowe

  • Association Between Olfactory Dysfunction and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease Dementia

    Rosebud O Roberts;Teresa J H Christianson;Walter K Kremers;Michelle M Mielke

  • Prevalence of a Physician-Assigned Diagnosis of Prostatitis: The Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men

    Rosebud O Roberts;Michael M Lieber;Thomas Rhodes;Cynthia J Girman;Cynthia J Girman

  • Validation of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified in Subjects with Normal Cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment, or Dementia

    David S. Knopman;Rosebud O. Roberts;Yonas E. Geda;V. Shane Pankratz

  • Baseline Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and the Risk of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Population-Based Study

    Yonas E. Geda;Rosebud O. Roberts;Michelle M. Mielke;David S. Knopman

  • Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Normal Cognitive Aging

    Yonas E. Geda;Rosebud O. Roberts;David S. Knopman;Ronald C. Petersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
Mary M. Machulda
Mary M. Machulda Mayo Clinic
Val J. Lowe
Val J. Lowe Mayo Clinic
Steven J. Jacobsen
Steven J. Jacobsen Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online healthcare degrees can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers beyond traditional medical school. Students interested in nursing often wonder, do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school? Many institutions offer flexible options, including programs without TEAS or HESI requirements, making nursing more accessible.

For those aiming to advance their careers quickly, accelerated healthcare programs allow students to fast-track their studies and enter administrative roles sooner. Similarly, registered nurses can pursue leadership or practitioner roles through rn to np bridge programs, which offer a direct pathway from an associate degree to a master’s degree online.

Those passionate about preventive health and wellness might consider online nutrition degrees, which can lead to roles in health education, dietetics, and coaching. These diverse online options provide multiple entry points and career advancements in healthcare, all designed to fit modern learners’ busy lives.

Best Scientists Citing Rosebud O. Roberts

Trending Scientists