World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kejal Kantarci

Kejal Kantarci

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
102
Citations
41805
World Ranking
704
National Ranking
395

Kejal Kantarci publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kejal Kantarci sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 764 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kejal Kantarci D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kejal Kantarci sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kejal Kantarci is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and focuses primarily on medical research, with particular emphasis on neurology and related subfields.

Their research covers various domains within medicine, notably:

  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Physiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Kantarci's work involves several significant topics including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The scientist has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Neurology
  • Nature Communications
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Scientific Reports

Among their recent papers are:

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies, 2020, Neurology
  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium, 2020, Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle University)
  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Longitudinal Associations of Blood Phosphorylated Tau181 and Neurofilament Light Chain With Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer Disease, 2021, JAMA Neurology

Kantarci frequently collaborates with other experts including:

  • Clifford R. Jack
  • Ronald C. Petersen
  • David S. Knopman
  • Bradley F. Boeve
  • Matthew L. Senjem

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

    Ian G. McKeith;Bradley F. Boeve;Dennis W. DIckson;Glenda Halliday

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Heather J. Wiste;Stephen D. Weigand;Terry M. Therneau

  • Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease: A call to action

    Rebecca A. Nebel;Neelum T. Aggarwal;Lisa L. Barnes;Aimee Gallagher

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies

    Ian G. McKeith;Tanis J. Ferman;Alan J. Thomas;Frédéric Blanc

  • Clinical Proton MR Spectroscopy in Central Nervous System Disorders

    Gülin Öz;Jeffry R. Alger;Peter B. Barker;Robert Bartha

  • An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Clifford R. Jack;David S. Knopman;Stephen D. Weigand;Heather J. Wiste

  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jacob W Vogel;Alexandra L Young;Neil P Oxtoby;Ruben Smith

  • Regional metabolic patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A 1H MRS study.

    K. Kantarci;C.R. Jack;Y.C. Xu;N.G. Campeau

  • Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: Validation studies

    Prashanthi Vemuri;Jeffrey L. Gunter;Matthew L. Senjem;Jennifer L. Whitwell

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • An autoradiographic evaluation of AV-1451 Tau PET in dementia.

    Val J. Lowe;Geoffry Curran;Ping Fang;Amanda M. Liesinger

  • Non-Stationarity in the ``Resting Brain's'' Modular Architecture

    David T. Jones;Prashanthi Vemuri;Matthew C. Murphy;Jeffrey L. Gunter

  • MRI correlates of neurofibrillary tangle pathology at autopsy: a voxel-based morphometry study.

    J. L. Whitwell;K. A. Josephs;M. E. Murray;K. Kantarci

  • Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations

    Martin Wilson;Ovidiu Andronesi;Peter B Barker;Robert Bartha

  • Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer's disease.

    Clifford R Jack;Heather J Wiste;Christopher G Schwarz;Val J Lowe

  • A large-scale comparison of cortical thickness and volume methods for measuring Alzheimer's disease severity.

    Christopher G. Schwarz;Jeffrey L. Gunter;Heather J. Wiste;Scott A. Przybelski

  • Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72

    Bradley F. Boeve;Kevin B. Boylan;Neill R. Graff-Radford;Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez

  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: regional diffusivity of water.

    Kejal Kantarci;Clifford R. Jack;Yue Cheng Xu;Norberg G. Campeau

  • Clinicopathologic and 11C-Pittsburgh compound B implications of Thal amyloid phase across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum

    Melissa E. Murray;Val J. Lowe;Neill R. Graff-Radford;Amanda M. Liesinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
Val J. Lowe
Val J. Lowe Mayo Clinic
David T. W. Jones
David T. W. Jones German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to many related online study options and career tracks. Many students consider supplementing their neuroscience education with certifications that pay well, which can quickly boost employability and income prospects in healthcare, data analysis, and mental health fields.

For those looking for more accessible pathways, there are a range of online college degrees that provide a flexible foundation for neuroscience-related careers. These degrees can be a great stepping stone, especially for individuals balancing work, family, or other commitments.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. If you are interested in social work or behavioral health, consider the cheapest online msw programs or online bcba programs as options. Both fields offer rewarding roles that often intersect with neuroscience concepts and can be pursued online at a lower cost than traditional routes.

Choosing the right combination of online degrees and certifications not only builds your expertise but also expands your career possibilities in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Kejal Kantarci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles