World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5752
World Ranking
11231
National Ranking
207

Damian A. Tamburri publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damian A. Tamburri sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 245 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Damian A. Tamburri D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damian A. Tamburri sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Damian A. Tamburri is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research output spans a broad spectrum within computer science, with a particular focus on software engineering and related subfields.

The main fields of study for Damian include:

  • Computer Science

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Management Information Systems
  • Software

The key research topics covered in their work are:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Open Source Software Innovations

Recent publications by Damian A. Tamburri include:

  • "Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Cybercrime threat intelligence: A systematic multi-vocal literature review," 2021, Computers & Security
  • "Blockchains," 2020, ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Toward a catalog of software quality metrics for infrastructure code," 2020, Journal of Systems and Software
  • "Within-Project Defect Prediction of Infrastructure-as-Code Using Product and Process Metrics," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Frequent co-authors in Damian's research collaborations are:

  • Willem-Jan van den Heuvel
  • Indika Kumara
  • Dario Di Nucci
  • Fabio Palomba
  • Giovanni Quattrocchi

Publishing venues where Damian has contributed extensively include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

In addition to articles, Damian has published books with Springer Science+Business Media:

  • Next-Gen Digital Services. A Retrospective and Roadmap for Service Computing of the Future, 2021
  • Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing, 2022

Best Publications

  • Service-Oriented Computing: A Trajectory for Research to 2030

    Unknown

  • The pains and gains of microservices: a systematic grey literature review

    Jacopo Soldani;Damian Andrew Tamburri;Willem-Jan Van Den Heuvel

  • Detecting code smells using machine learning techniques: Are we there yet?

    Dario Di Nucci;Fabio Palomba;Damian A. Tamburri;Alexander Serebrenik

  • Microservices migration patterns

    Armin Balalaie;Abbas Heydarnoori;Pooyan Jamshidi;Damian A. Tamburri

  • Social Debt in Software Engineering: Insights from Industry

    Damian Andrew Tamburri;Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • DevOps: introducing infrastructure-as-code

    Matej Artac;Tadej Borovssak;Elisabetta Di Nitto;Michele Guerriero

  • Arcan: A Tool for Architectural Smells Detection

    Francesca Arcelli Fontana;Ilaria Pigazzini;Riccardo Roveda;Damian Tamburri

  • Providing Architectural Languages and Tools Interoperability through Model Transformation Technologies

    I. Malavolta;H. Muccini;P. Pelliccione;D.A. Tamburri

  • Gender diversity and women in software teams: how do they affect community smells?

    Gemma Catolino;Fabio Palomba;Damian A. Tamburri;Alexander Serebrenik

  • Organizational social structures for software engineering

    Damian A. Tamburri;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Adoption, Support, and Challenges of Infrastructure-as-Code: Insights from Industry

    MIchele Guerriero;Martin Garriga;Damian A. Tamburri;Fabio Palomba

  • What is social debt in software engineering

    Damian A. Tamburri;Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Design principles for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A formal concept analysis and its evaluation

    Damian A. Tamburri

  • Beyond Technical Aspects: How Do Community Smells Influence the Intensity of Code Smells?

    Fabio Palomba;Damian Andrew Tamburri;Francesca Arcelli Fontana;Rocco Oliveto

  • Sustainable MLOps: Trends and Challenges

    Unknown

  • Blockchains: A Systematic Multivocal Literature Review

    Bert-Jan Butijn;Damian A. Tamburri;Willem-Jan van den Heuvel

  • Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research

    Paul Ralph;Nauman bin Ali;Sebastian Baltes;Domenico Bianculli

  • Exploring Community Smells in Open-Source: An Automated Approach

    Damian A. Tamburri;Fabio Palomba;Rick Kazman

  • Cybercrime threat intelligence: A systematic multi-vocal literature review

    Giuseppe Cascavilla;Damian A. Tamburri;Willem Jan van den Heuvel

  • Using the Cloud to Facilitate Global Software Development Challenges

    Sajid Ibrahim Hashmi;Viktor Clerc;Maryam Razavian;Christina Manteli

  • The Architect's Role in Community Shepherding

    Damian A. Tamburri;Rick Kazman;Hamed Fahimi

  • Discovering community patterns in open-source: a systematic approach and its evaluation

    Damian A. Tamburri;Fabio Palomba;Alexander Serebrenik;Andy Zaidman

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabio Palomba
Fabio Palomba University of Salerno
Elisabetta Di Nitto
Elisabetta Di Nitto Polytechnic University of Milan
Patricia Lago
Patricia Lago Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rick Kazman
Rick Kazman University of Hawaii at Manoa
Alexander Serebrenik
Alexander Serebrenik Eindhoven University of Technology
Davide Taibi
Davide Taibi University of Oulu
Jun Han
Jun Han Swinburne University of Technology
Pooyan Jamshidi
Pooyan Jamshidi University of South Carolina
Francesca Arcelli Fontana
Francesca Arcelli Fontana University of Milano-Bicocca
Andy Zaidman
Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about expanding your computer science studies? There are several related online degrees and certifications you can explore to increase your skills and career options. For those interested in diverse scientific foundations, a bachelor of science in physics online is a great way to build analytical and problem-solving abilities while studying from anywhere.

If you are looking to specialize, data science continues to grow in demand. For budget-conscious students, it’s worth asking what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to find programs that offer the best value. Engineering is another linked field; be sure to compare electrical engineering online tuition costs before enrolling in any program.

Not ready for a full degree? There are also quick certifications that pay well and can enhance your resume in less time. By exploring these options, you can tailor your education to your goals and finances while opening doors to high-demand tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Damian A. Tamburri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles