World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
8493
World Ranking
7551
National Ranking
128

Patricia Lago publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Lago sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 317 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patricia Lago D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Lago sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia Lago is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has an extensive publication record in the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields including Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computer Science Applications.

The scientist's main research topics cover areas such as Green IT and Sustainability, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies, Software Engineering Research, Open Source Software Innovations, Software System Performance and Reliability, and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development.

Patricia Lago has published frequently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Systems and Software, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SSRN Electronic Journal, and Information and Software Technology.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Ivano Malavolta, Roberto Verdecchia, Ilias Gerostathopoulos, Markus Funke, and Iffat Fatima.

Recent research publications include:

  • Green IT and Green Software, 2021, IEEE Software
  • Sustainability in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature Review, 2024, ACM Transactions on Computing Education
  • Development and evaluation of a reference measurement model for assessing the resource and energy efficiency of software products and components-Green Software Measurement Model (GSMM), 2024, Future Generation Computer Systems
  • Building and evaluating a theory of architectural technical debt in software-intensive systems, 2021, Journal of Systems and Software
  • Threats to validity in software engineering research: A critical reflection, 2023, Information and Software Technology

Best Publications

  • Building up and reasoning about architectural knowledge

    Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Hans Van Vliet

  • What Industry Needs from Architectural Languages: A Survey

    I. Malavolta;P. Lago;H. Muccini;P. Pelliccione

  • Research on Architecting Microservices: Trends, Focus, and Potential for Industrial Adoption

    Paolo Di Francesco;Ivano Malavolta;Patricia Lago

  • Architecting with microservices: A systematic mapping study

    Paolo Di Francesco;Patricia Lago;Ivano Malavolta

  • Framing sustainability as a property of software quality

    Patricia Lago;Sedef Akinli Koçak;Ivica Crnkovic;Birgit Penzenstadler

  • Migrating Towards Microservice Architectures: An Industrial Survey

    Paolo Di Francesco;Patricia Lago;Ivano Malavolta

  • Characteristics of open source projects

    A. Capiluppi;P. Lago;M. Morisio

  • Social Debt in Software Engineering: Insights from Industry

    Damian Andrew Tamburri;Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Exploring service-oriented system engineering challenges: a systematic literature review

    Qing Gu;Patricia Lago

  • Software Architecture Knowledge Management

    Muhammad Ali Babar;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Patricia Lago;Hans Vliet

  • Software Architecture Knowledge Management: Theory and Practice

    Muhammad Ali Babar;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • A stakeholder-driven service life cycle model for SOA

    Qing Gu;Patricia Lago

  • Organizational social structures for software engineering

    Damian A. Tamburri;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Architectural knowledge: getting to the core

    Remco C. de Boer;Rik Farenhorst;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Explicit assumptions enrich architectural models

    Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Eliciting software process models with the E3 language

    Maria Letizia Jaccheri;Gian Pietro Picco;Patricia Lago

  • What is social debt in software engineering

    Damian A. Tamburri;Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Characterizing the contribution of quality requirements to software sustainability

    Nelly Condori-Fernandez;Patricia Lago

  • A scoped approach to traceability management

    Patricia Lago;Henry Muccini;Hans van Vliet

  • Architectural knowledge and rationale: issues, trends, challenges

    Paris Avgeriou;Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Paul Grisham

Frequent Co-Authors

Paris Avgeriou
Paris Avgeriou University of Groningen
Philippe Kruchten
Philippe Kruchten University of British Columbia
Grace A. Lewis
Grace A. Lewis Carnegie Mellon University
Damian A. Tamburri
Damian A. Tamburri Eindhoven University of Technology
Henry Muccini
Henry Muccini University of L'Aquila
Maurizio Morisio
Maurizio Morisio Polytechnic University of Turin
Ivano Malavolta
Ivano Malavolta Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Muhammad Ali Babar
Muhammad Ali Babar University of Adelaide
John Grundy
John Grundy Monash University
Elisabetta Di Nitto
Elisabetta Di Nitto Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students consider related areas such as engineering, where understanding electrical engineering online tuition costs can help in planning your education budget effectively.

Those seeking more immediate workforce entry might benefit from 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certificates can boost your resume and lead to lucrative tech roles in a short timeframe.

Ambitious professionals aiming for advanced qualifications often look into the fastest masters degree online options. These programs allow you to accelerate your studies and enter high-level jobs sooner.

As you plan your pathway, reviewing the graduate degrees that are worth it can help you invest wisely in your education, ensuring your efforts align with today’s high-demand tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia Lago

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles