World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
23700
World Ranking
6004
National Ranking
228

Philippe Kruchten publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Kruchten sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Philippe Kruchten D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Kruchten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philippe Kruchten is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their primary research areas are centered in Computer Science, with a strong focus on Information Systems. Their scholarly output extends to subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Science Applications.

Their research addresses several main topics, including:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Open Source Software Innovations

Kruchten has authored multiple papers, with notable recent publications including:

  • "Architectural Blueprints: The 4+1 View Model of Software Architecture" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Building and evaluating a theory of architectural technical debt in software-intensive systems" (2021), published in Journal of Systems and Software
  • "Blurring boundaries: Toward the collective empathic understanding of product requirements" (2021), published in Information and Software Technology
  • "Blurring Boundaries: Toward the Collective Empathic Understanding of Product Requirements" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Their collaborative work includes joint research with frequent coauthors such as Maria Paasivaara, Peggy Gregory, Roberto Verdecchia, Patricia Lago, and Viktoria Stray.

In addition to research articles, Kruchten has contributed to the compilation and editing of books published by Springer Science+Business Media. These works primarily focus on Agile methodologies within software engineering and include multiple editions and workshop compilations released between 2020 and upcoming editions projected for 2025.

Their publication venues are concentrated in fields relevant to software architecture and software system development, including arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Systems and Software, and Information and Software Technology.

Best Publications

  • The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction

    Philippe Kruchten

  • The 4+1 View Model of architecture

    P.B. Kruchten

  • The Rational Unified Process Made Easy: A Practitioner's Guide to the RUP

    Per Kroll;Philippe Kruchten

  • Building up and reasoning about architectural knowledge

    Philippe Kruchten;Patricia Lago;Hans Van Vliet

  • Technical Debt: From Metaphor to Theory and Practice

    Philippe Kruchten;Robert L. Nord;Ipek Ozkaya

  • The rational unified process

    Philippe Kruchten

  • Real Challenges in Mobile App Development

    Mona Erfani Joorabchi;Ali Mesbah;Philippe Kruchten

  • Architectural Blueprints: The 4+1 View Model of Software Architecture

    Philippe Kruchten

  • Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems

    Nanette Brown;Yuanfang Cai;Yuepu Guo;Rick Kazman

  • The Past, Present, and Future for Software Architecture

    P. Kruchten;H. Obbink;J. Stafford

  • A general model of software architecture design derived from five industrial approaches

    Christine Hofmeister;Philippe Kruchten;Robert L. Nord;Henk Obbink

  • An Ontology of Architectural Design Decisions in Software-Intensive Systems

    Philippe Kruchten

  • Scaling Software Agility: Best Practices for Large Enterprises

    Dean Leffingwell;Philippe Kruchten

  • Using grounded theory to study the experience of software development

    Steve Adolph;Wendy Hall;Philippe Kruchten

  • Managing Technical Debt in Software Engineering (Dagstuhl Seminar 16162)

    Paris Avgeriou;Philippe Kruchten;Ipek Ozkaya;Carolyn B. Seaman

  • Agility and Architecture: Can They Coexist?

    P. Abrahamsson;M.A. Babar;P. Kruchten

  • Contextualizing agile software development

    Philippe Kruchten

  • In Search of a Metric for Managing Architectural Technical Debt

    Robert L. Nord;Ipek Ozkaya;Philippe Kruchten;Marco Gonzalez-Rojas

  • Decision-making techniques for software architecture design: A comparative survey

    Davide Falessi;Giovanni Cantone;Rick Kazman;Philippe Kruchten

  • The Decision View's Role in Software Architecture Practice

    P. Kruchten;R. Capilla;J.C. Dueas

  • Agile Project Management

    Frank Maurer;Mike Cohn;Mike Griffiths;Jim Highsmith

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia Lago
Patricia Lago Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Paris Avgeriou
Paris Avgeriou University of Groningen
Carolyn Seaman
Carolyn Seaman University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Rick Kazman
Rick Kazman University of Hawaii at Manoa
Muhammad Ali Babar
Muhammad Ali Babar University of Adelaide
Wendy Hall
Wendy Hall University of Southampton
Dewayne E. Perry
Dewayne E. Perry The University of Texas at Austin
Pekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson Tampere University
Konstantin Beznosov
Konstantin Beznosov University of British Columbia
Victor C. M. Leung
Victor C. M. Leung Shenzhen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are now opting for online programs that offer flexibility, affordability, and fast-track learning. For those interested in broadening their business expertise, the cheapest online MBA programs can complement your tech skills and open leadership opportunities in the tech industry.

If you want to advance your qualifications quickly, consider an online masters degree that can be completed in as little as one year. Such programs are designed for career-driven professionals who wish to specialize without taking extended breaks from work.

There is also rising demand for online degrees that promise high earning potential and shorter completion times, making them attractive for those seeking to enter the workforce rapidly.

Tech enthusiasts looking for in-demand skills might explore the cheapest online masters in artificial intelligence. These affordable programs help students master cutting-edge AI technology and prepare for a range of dynamic careers.

Whether your interest is leadership, specialization, or high-earning career tracks, exploring these related online degrees can help you achieve your professional goals in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Kruchten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles