World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
79
Citations
26418
World Ranking
1138
National Ranking
2

Jan Bosch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bosch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 497 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jan Bosch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bosch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Jan Bosch is affiliated with Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. Their research spans primarily the fields of Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, with a strong focus on subfields such as Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Computer Science Applications.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics that include:

  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Data Quality and Management

Jan Bosch has contributed numerous papers published in various venues. Selected recent papers include:

  • Large-scale machine learning systems in real-world industrial settings: A review of challenges and solutions (2020), published in Information and Software Technology
  • Data management for production quality deep learning models: Challenges and solutions (2022), published in Journal of Systems and Software
  • Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting (2020), published in JAMA Neurology
  • The influence of Technical Debt on software developer morale (2020), published in Journal of Systems and Software
  • Going digital: Disruption and transformation in software-intensive embedded systems ecosystems (2020), published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their common co-authors include:

  • Helena Holmström Olsson
  • Римма Джусупова
  • Ivica Crnković
  • David Issa Mattos
  • Antonio Martini

Jan Bosch's publications appear across various key scientific venues, demonstrating engagement with both conference and journal communities. The frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information and Software Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • Journal of Systems and Software

Best Publications

  • Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach

    Jan Bosch

  • On the notion of variability in software product lines

    J. van Gurp;J. Bosch;M. Svahnberg

  • Software Architecture as a Set of Architectural Design Decisions

    A. Jansen;J. Bosch

  • A Taxonomy of Blockchain-Based Systems for Architecture Design

    Xiwei Xu;Ingo Weber;Mark Staples;Liming Zhu

  • From software product lines to software ecosystems

    Jan Bosch

  • A taxonomy of variability realization techniques

    Mikael Svahnberg;Jilles van Gurp;Jan Bosch

  • Architecting for usability: a survey

    Eelke Folmer;Jan Bosch

  • Architecture-level modifiability analysis (ALMA)

    PerOlof Bengtsson;Nico Lassing;Jan Bosch;Hans van Vliet

  • Software Architecture: The Next Step

    Jan Bosch

  • Abstracting Object Interactions Using Composition Filters

    Mehmet Aksit;Ken Wakita;Jan Bosch;Lodewijk Bergmans

  • COVAMOF: A framework for modeling variability in software product families

    Marco Sinnema;Sybren Deelstra;Jos Nijhuis;Jan Bosch

  • From integration to composition: On the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystems

    Jan Bosch;Petra Bosch-Sijtsema

  • Climbing the "Stairway to Heaven" -- A Mulitiple-Case Study Exploring Barriers in the Transition from Agile Development towards Continuous Deployment of Software

    Helena Holmstrom Olsson;Hiva Alahyari;Jan Bosch

  • Variability Issues in Software Product Lines

    Jan Bosch;Gert Florijn;Danny Greefhorst;Juha Kuusela

  • Design erosion: problems and causes

    Jilles van Gurp;Jan Bosch

  • Product derivation in software product families: a case study

    Sybren Deelstra;Marco Sinnema;Jan Bosch

  • Modeling continuous integration practice differences in industry software development

    Daniel Ståhl;Jan Bosch

  • Maturity and Evolution in Software Product Lines: Approaches, Artefacts and Organization

    Jan Bosch

  • Superimposition: a component adaptation technique

    Jan Bosch

  • An overview of Dynamic Software Product Line architectures and techniques: Observations from research and industry

    Rafael Capilla;Jan Bosch;Pablo Trinidad;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Variability issues in software product lines

    J Bosch;G Florijn;D Greefhorst;J Kuusela

Frequent Co-Authors

Helena Holmström Olsson
Helena Holmström Olsson Malmö University
Slinger Jansen
Slinger Jansen Utrecht University
Henry Muccini
Henry Muccini University of L'Aquila
Ivica Crnkovic
Ivica Crnkovic Chalmers University of Technology
Brian Fitzgerald
Brian Fitzgerald University of Limerick
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Sjaak Brinkkemper Utrecht University
Miroslaw Staron
Miroslaw Staron University of Gothenburg
Len Bass
Len Bass Carnegie Mellon University
Rick Kazman
Rick Kazman University of Hawaii at Manoa
Markku Oivo
Markku Oivo University of Oulu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options in Computer Science extends beyond traditional on-campus programs. Many students are now considering online associates as a flexible and affordable entry point, providing foundational knowledge and skills for early tech roles.

If you’re concerned about tuition, there are plenty of affordable online degree programs that cater to a wide range of budgets without compromising on quality. This makes pursuing higher education more manageable and accessible for students from diverse backgrounds.

Academic records don’t have to limit your opportunities. For those who may not have a perfect academic history, there are online colleges that accept low gpa. These institutions provide alternative pathways to a computer science degree and can help motivated learners move forward in their careers.

Computer Science graduates enjoy versatile career options, but those with broader interests might also consider fields like environmental science. For more information on job prospects in related fields, check out jobs for environmental science majors.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Bosch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles