World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nathan S. Consedine

Nathan S. Consedine

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
9300
World Ranking
4452
National Ranking
24

Nathan S. Consedine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan S. Consedine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nathan S. Consedine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan S. Consedine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan S. Consedine is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research spans across psychology and medicine, with a primary focus on clinical psychology, general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, public health, environmental and occupational health, and applied psychology.

Their work extensively covers topics including mindfulness and compassion interventions, empathy and medical education, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, eating disorders and behaviors, COVID-19 and mental health, behavioral health and interventions, and diabetes management and research.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nathan S. Consedine include Anna Serlachius, Alina Pavlova, Anna Boggiss, Alana Cavadino, and Jennifer Brenton-Peters.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Nathan S. Consedine include:

  • A systematic review of gratitude interventions: Effects on physical health and health behaviors, 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Self-compassion as a Stress Moderator: A Cross-sectional Study of 1700 Doctors, Nurses, and Medical Students, 2020, Mindfulness
  • More than a feeling? What does compassion in healthcare 'look like' to patients?, 2022, Health Expectations
  • Predictors of Physician Compassion, Empathy, and Related Constructs: a Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Outcomes of intuitive eating interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Eating Disorders

Nathan S. Consedine has published multiple articles in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include Mindfulness, Diabetic Medicine, British Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Fear, Anxiety, Worry, and Breast Cancer Screening Behavior: A Critical Review

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai;Yulia S Krivoshekova;Lynn Ryzewicz

  • Altruism Relates to Health in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Older Adults

    William Michael Brown;Nathan S. Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • Positive and negative social exchanges and mental health across the transition to college: Loneliness as a mediator

    Katherine L. Fiori;Nathan S. Consedine

  • Moderators of the Emotion Inhibition-Health Relationship: A Review and Research Agenda:

    Nathan S. Consedine;Carol Magai;George A. Bonanno

  • Kindness Matters: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mindful Self-Compassion Intervention Improves Depression, Distress, and HbA1c Among Patients With Diabetes.

    Anna M Friis;Malcolm H Johnson;Richard G Cutfield;Nathan S Consedine

  • Do slumped and upright postures affect stress responses? A randomized trial.

    Shwetha Nair;Mark Sagar;John Sollers;Nathan Consedine

  • Emotion experience and expression across the adult life span: Insights from a multimodal assessment study.

    Carol Magai;Nathan S. Consedine;Yulia S. Krivoshekova;Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi

  • The role of discrete emotions in health outcomes: A critical review

    Nathan S. Consedine;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Attachment and emotion experience in later life: the view from emotions theory.

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Wellbeing of adult children and ageing parents: Associations with intergenerational support and relationship quality

    Eva-Maria Merz;Nathan S. Consedine;Hans-Joachim Schulze;Carlo Schuengel

  • The contribution of emotional characteristics to breast cancer screening among women from six ethnic groups.

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai;Alfred I Neugut

  • Comparing Genetic Ancestry and Self-Described Race in African Americans Born in the United States and in Africa

    Rona Yaeger;Alexa Avila-Bront;Kazeem Abdul;Patricia C. Nolan

  • Beyond Compassion Fatigue: The Transactional Model of Physician Compassion

    Antonio T. Fernando;Nathan S. Consedine

  • The association of family support and wellbeing in later life depends on adult attachment style

    Eva-Maria Merz;Nathan S Consedine

  • The uncharted waters of emotion: ethnicity, trait emotion and emotion expression in older adults.

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis.

    Carol Magai;Nathan Consedine;Alfred I. Neugut;Dawn L. Hershman

  • Prostate cancer screening behavior in men from seven ethnic groups: the fear factor.

    Nathan S. Consedine;Amy H. Morgenstern;Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi;Carol Magai

  • Attachment in African American and European American older adults: the roles of early life socialization and religiosity.

    Diane P. F. Montague;Carol Magai;Nathan S. Consedine;Michael Gillespie

  • A systematic review of gratitude interventions: Effects on physical health and health behaviors.

    Anna L. Boggiss;Nathan S. Consedine;Jennifer M. Brenton-Peters;Paul L. Hofman

  • Does self-compassion mitigate the relationship between burnout and barriers to compassion? A cross-sectional quantitative study of 799 nurses

    Vinayak Dev;Antonio T. Fernando;Anecita Gigi Lim;Nathan S. Consedine

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Magai
Carol Magai Long Island University
Alfred I. Neugut
Alfred I. Neugut Columbia University
John A. Windsor
John A. Windsor University of Auckland
Elizabeth Broadbent
Elizabeth Broadbent University of Auckland
Nicola Dalbeth
Nicola Dalbeth University of Auckland
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
George A. Bonanno
George A. Bonanno Columbia University
David A. Pizarro
David A. Pizarro Cornell University
Soraya Seedat
Soraya Seedat Stellenbosch University
Dawn L. Hershman
Dawn L. Hershman Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a future in psychology, it is essential to understand which pathways offer the highest value and career opportunities. Many students explore programs that not only provide strong academic foundations but also pave the way for rewarding and in-demand professions.

If you are looking to specialize your studies or maximize potential earnings, explore the most valuable psychology programs in the US. Regional programs can also offer unique advantages; for example, you might consider the most valuable psychology degrees in South Carolina or the most valuable psychology degrees in Tampa for competitive local options.

Online learning continues to grow, opening doors for those interested in related fields such as social work. Many universities now offer flexible online opportunities, like the best online bsw programs in America. These programs can lead to careers in counseling, mental health services, and more, expanding your scope beyond traditional psychology roles.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan S. Consedine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles